Continuity of care is critical in the effective treatment of individuals, particularly those facing complex health challenges. Understanding the nuances of what constitutes consistent and comprehensive support – the very Diagnosis Care Definition in practice – is paramount. This article delves into the existing body of research to clarify how continuity of care has been understood, implemented, and evaluated, especially in the context of dual diagnosis treatment. By examining current literature, we aim to provide a clearer perspective on enhancing its application within both research and clinical settings.
This review synthesized findings from quantitative studies published in English after 1980. The research focused on identifying articles that explored “continuity” in conjunction with “substance” and “treatment” within electronic databases. The selection criteria mandated that the studies discussed “continuity” within treatment populations that included individuals with a dual diagnosis, ensuring relevance to complex care scenarios.
Analysis of 18 non-randomized studies meeting these criteria revealed six fundamental dimensions of continuity of care in this specific treatment landscape. These core types encompass: the sustained relationship with healthcare provider(s), seamless transitions across various services, managed continuity during patient transfers, the regularity and intensity of care provided, responsiveness to the evolving needs of the patient, and ultimately, successful patient linkage to necessary support systems. Factors such as patient age, ethnicity, medical condition, living situation, and the specific nature of mental health and/or substance use disorders were identified as influencing the continuity of care experienced throughout treatment. Notably, evidence suggested a positive correlation between achieving continuity of care and improved patient outcomes and enhanced treatment effectiveness.
In conclusion, this review provides a synthesized overview of how continuity of care has been conceptualized, applied, and assessed in current research. These findings serve as a valuable foundation for future research endeavors and for service providers seeking to implement and evaluate continuity of care in a standardized and effective manner. Understanding the diagnosis care definition through the lens of continuity allows for a more consistent and impactful approach to treatment, ultimately determining its significance in improving the lives of individuals with dual diagnoses and highlighting the importance of integrated and continuous support systems.
