Differential Diagnosis for Headache and Neck Pain After a Car Accident: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Headaches and neck pain are prevalent complaints following motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). While many post-accident headaches are benign and resolve with conservative management, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to discern between primary headaches and secondary headaches, which may indicate serious underlying conditions. Post-traumatic headaches often mimic primary headache disorders in their clinical presentation and progression. However, secondary headaches, such as those arising from subdural hematoma, though less common, pose a significant risk and necessitate prompt diagnosis and intervention, especially when symptoms worsen.

This article delves into the differential diagnosis of headache and neck pain after a car accident, emphasizing the importance of recognizing potential red flags that warrant further investigation. We will explore the complexities of post-traumatic headache, differentiate it from other headache types, and highlight critical considerations for identifying serious underlying pathologies like subdural hematoma. This comprehensive guide aims to equip healthcare practitioners with the knowledge to effectively assess and manage patients presenting with headache and neck pain following MVAs, ensuring timely and appropriate care.

Clinical Features: Recognizing Red Flags

The case of a 65-year-old female who developed a subdural hematoma after a seemingly minor car accident underscores the critical need for meticulous examination, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate management of patients experiencing headaches post-MVA. Initially, this patient presented with common symptoms: lower back pain, neck pain, and headache. These symptoms appeared uncomplicated and typical of whiplash-associated disorders. However, her condition evolved over a month, culminating in focal neurological deficits. This case vividly illustrates that relying solely on initial clinical presentation can be misleading. Secondary headaches, especially those stemming from conditions like subdural hematoma, may not always present with immediate, overt signs. Therefore, a high index of suspicion and a systematic approach to differential diagnosis are paramount. In situations where clinical examination alone proves insufficient to rule out secondary headaches, immediate referral to an emergency department becomes a necessary and potentially life-saving step.

Introduction to Post-Traumatic Headaches

Headache disorders are a significant global health concern. Statistics reveal that a substantial portion of the population experiences headaches, with lifetime prevalence around 21.2% and an annual prevalence of 13.4%. These conditions significantly impair quality of life, affecting personal relationships, work productivity, and overall well-being.

The International Headache Society (IHS) provides a standardized framework for classifying headaches in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). This classification distinguishes between primary and secondary headaches. Primary headaches, such as tension-type headache, migraine, and cluster headache, are conditions in themselves, while secondary headaches are symptoms resulting from an underlying condition. Secondary headaches often carry a greater risk of morbidity and mortality, requiring prompt and targeted medical intervention. Given the widespread use of alternative therapies like chiropractic care for headache relief, primary contact practitioners across all disciplines must be adept at recognizing and diagnosing secondary headaches to ensure optimal patient management.

Post-traumatic headaches, a type of secondary headache, frequently arise after motor vehicle accidents. These headaches are often linked to acceleration/deceleration injuries, commonly associated with whiplash and related symptoms. When evaluating patients with post-traumatic headaches, it is imperative to consider, even if rare, serious differential diagnoses such as subdural hematoma, particularly if the patient’s symptoms worsen or fail to improve with initial conservative treatment.

Subdural hematoma, while relatively uncommon after mild head injury with normal neurological presentation (incidence of 0.5–1%), is a critical consideration. Headache from subdural hematoma can be nonspecific, ranging from mild to severe, constant, or intermittent pain. Intriguingly, cases of subdural hematoma have been reported even without direct head trauma, such as in “roller coaster headache” and whiplash traffic injuries, highlighting that the mechanism of injury can be subtle. Another reported case involved headache and cognitive impairment following minor head trauma.

The subsequent case study details a patient who presented with post-traumatic headache after a MVA. Her condition necessitated urgent medical attention due to worsening headache symptoms over several weeks. The following discussion emphasizes the importance of differential diagnosis and the critical thinking process required in managing such patients effectively.

Case Presentation: A Subdural Hematoma Mimicking Common Post-Accident Complaints

A 65-year-old woman, retired and otherwise healthy, sought chiropractic care six days after being involved in a motor vehicle collision. She was a belted passenger in the right rear seat of a vehicle that was rear-ended while slowing down. Notably, her seat lacked a headrest. She reported no loss of consciousness and no direct impact within the vehicle. Immediately following the accident, she did not seek medical attention, opting for over-the-counter pain relief with Advil, which provided some temporary relief. Her initial pain was primarily on the left side of her body. Due to language barriers, standardized Neck Disability and Headache indices were not administered, but the patient indicated she could perform most daily activities despite experiencing dull lower back pain and occipital headaches. She had even attended several social events prior to seeking treatment, suggesting reasonable cognitive function and memory. She described her headaches as a pressure-like sensation without radiating pain.

Her past medical history included a previous MVA six years prior, for which she received chiropractic treatment with complete symptom resolution. She reported no other significant medical issues or pre-existing neck or lower back pain.

Physical examination revealed limited active cervical range of motion, approximately 80% of normal, with contralateral tightness during lateral flexion and posterior cervical tightness with forward flexion. Passive joint play assessment was limited by guarding. Palpation revealed tenderness in the suboccipital and levator scapulae muscles bilaterally, and palpation of the suboccipital region reproduced her headache. Active lumbar flexion was restricted, with fingertips reaching only the distal 3/4 of the tibia, and extension was approximately 1/3 of normal range. Lumbar lateral flexion showed contralateral tightness. Straight leg raise was full and pain-free at 90 degrees bilaterally. Neurological examination of the upper and lower limbs was normal, with downgoing plantar responses. She could ambulate on toes and heels but reported lower back pain with heel walking.

Based on these findings, she was diagnosed with post-MVA cervical and lumbar strain/sprain, and cervicogenic headache. The initial treatment plan included soft tissue therapy to the neck (initially opting for spinal mobilization before considering manipulation) and soft tissue therapy and spinal manipulation to the lumbar spine. A home stretching program for neck and lower back was also prescribed.

At her sixth visit, three weeks into treatment, she reported approximately 50% subjective improvement and demonstrated objective gains in cervical and lumbar range of motion. However, her headaches were intensifying. Her blood pressure was 120/74, and pulse was regular. She received three more treatments and reported 80% overall improvement.

Approximately one month after the initial treatment, a concerning change occurred. She reported numbness in her right arm and a subjective feeling of weakness in her right leg, noting that it felt like it was dragging. She also described episodes of losing balance and being caught by her daughter on several occasions to prevent falls. At this visit, her blood pressure was 112/70, and pulse remained regular. However, neurological examination now revealed a 3+ reflex in the right upper limb, compared to 2+ on the left. Achilles reflex testing elicited three beats of unsustained clonus in the right foot. Due to these new neurological findings, she was immediately advised to go to the hospital. She was initially hesitant due to upcoming vacation plans, but the urgency of her situation was emphasized, and she proceeded to the emergency department. No chiropractic treatment was administered at this visit.

A CT scan at the emergency department led to a preliminary diagnosis of subdural hematoma. She was then transferred to another hospital for surgical decompression. Upon returning to the chiropractic clinic about two weeks post-surgery, a follow-up examination showed no abnormal neurological findings, and she reported no significant physical limitations after surgery. Consequently, she was discharged from chiropractic care.

Discussion: Navigating the Complexities of Post-Traumatic Headache

Post-Traumatic Headache: Pathophysiology and Classification

Headache stands out as a primary symptom following MVAs, even in cases classified as minor head trauma or whiplash injuries. The underlying mechanisms of post-traumatic headaches are still debated. While earlier theories leaned towards psychological origins, current understanding increasingly points to organic causes related to the physical trauma to the head and neck. Objective measures to definitively assess the physical injury remain a challenge in research and clinical practice.

The question of whether mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) can result solely from whiplash injuries, without direct head impact, remains a point of discussion. Some researchers categorize acceleration/deceleration injuries under MTBI, while others maintain them as distinct entities. The WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury has studied MTBI after traffic collisions (excluding whiplash), reporting a population-based incidence of approximately 600/100,000 for mild traumatic brain injuries due to direct head trauma with possible loss of consciousness. These injuries constitute a significant proportion of treated brain injuries (70–90%), commonly caused by falls and MVAs, and are more frequent in teenagers, young adults, and males. Generally, the prognosis for adults is favorable, with cognitive deficits and symptoms typically resolving within 3–12 months. However, factors such as pending litigation and compensation claims may prolong recovery. In the presented case, the absence of loss of consciousness, disorientation, or other clear indicators of MTBI initially lowered the suspicion for this condition, especially given the ongoing debate about whiplash as a mechanism for MTBI.

The International Headache Society’s 2004 ICHD-II introduced a separate category for headaches attributed to whiplash injuries, distinguishing them from general post-traumatic headaches. This reflects a refined understanding of headache classification in the context of whiplash injuries.

The diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic headache due to minor head trauma (ICHD-II) include:

• Absence of moderate-to-severe head trauma.
• New-onset headache or worsening of pre-existing headache following trauma.
• Head trauma associated with less than 30 minutes of loss of consciousness, or no loss of consciousness.
• Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or higher.
• Presence of signs or symptoms indicative of concussion.

The updated classification also tightened the timeframe for symptom onset to within seven days post-trauma (previously 14 days) and defined chronicity as persisting beyond three months (previously eight weeks).

The specific type of post-traumatic headache varies. Studies indicate that tension-type headache is most common (37%), followed by migraine (27%), cervicogenic headache (18%), and a subset of patients not fitting into any specific category (18%). Cervicogenic headaches after whiplash injury have been reported at an incidence of approximately 8% at 6 weeks and 3% at one year, generally following a course of recovery. Physical impairments, notably reduced neck mobility, are more frequent in cervicogenic headaches, particularly those with a traumatic onset. Patients with post-traumatic cervicogenic headache often exhibit limited cervical range of motion and decreased strength in neck flexor and extensor muscles compared to other headache types.

In the presented case, the patient exhibited reduced active range of motion in all cervical planes and positive palpatory findings after an acceleration/deceleration injury without direct head trauma or loss of consciousness as a rear-seat passenger. The absence of a headrest in her vehicle is a noteworthy factor. Research shows that improper headrest use, common among drivers, can increase whiplash injury risk significantly (1.6 to 6 times). Optimal headrest positioning involves the top of the headrest being above ear level and a post-cranial gap of less than four inches.

The IHS criteria have also refined the definition of cervicogenic headache. According to the 2004 criteria, patients with presentations similar to this case—myofascial tenderness without definitive, reliable clinical signs—would likely be classified under tension-type headache with associated pericranial tenderness. In this instance, the patient initially presented with a post-MVA headache suggestive of cervicogenic origin but progressed despite conservative treatment, ultimately requiring medical referral and diagnosis of subdural hematoma.

Subdural Hematoma: A Rare but Critical Differential

Subdural hematoma is a relatively rare condition, with an annual incidence of approximately 1.72 per 100,000 population, increasing with age to 7.35 per 100,000 in the 70-79 age group. Despite its rarity, it carries significant risks of mortality and morbidity. The pathophysiology of subdural hematoma often involves the bridging cerebral veins, particularly in older individuals where cerebral atrophy increases vulnerability to tearing stresses. Other risk factors include trauma history, male sex, coagulopathies, thrombocytopenia, and alcoholism. Trauma history is frequently present but can be minor, even forgotten by older patients. In some cases, no trauma history is reported, suggesting spontaneous causes or recall bias for trivial injuries. Males may be more predisposed due to higher trauma risk. Alcoholics are at increased risk due to falls and potential liver disease leading to coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies, including aspirin, warfarin, and coumadin, also elevate subdural hematoma risk. Subdural hematomas can resolve spontaneously or progress and enlarge. They are categorized as acute (within 48 hours of injury), subacute (2-14 days), and chronic (weeks to months). Acute hematomas are primarily blood clots, while subacute and chronic forms contain mixtures of clotted and fluid blood, or are entirely fluid, respectively.

Symptoms of subdural hematoma can be subtle and easily overlooked. A large retrospective study of chronic subdural hematomas over 30 years showed a male predominance (5:1). In this study, 14.7% of patients presented fully conscious with headache due to increased intracranial pressure. Other common presentations included behavioral disturbances (17.6%), seizures (12%), visual disturbances (11.7%), stroke (29.1%), and coma (14.9%). Headaches associated with subdural hematoma may exhibit periods of remission and exacerbation, with exacerbations often triggered by standing from a prone position and worsened by vomiting. Papilledema may be present on examination, though neurological deficits may be absent initially. Behavioral changes can range from emotional lability and garrulousness to sleep disturbances, impaired concentration, depression, mania-like states, and neglected personal appearance. Visual disturbances include blurring due to papilledema and double vision from cranial nerve palsies (specifically sixth and third nerve deficits).

Weakness on one side of the body was the most frequent single symptom in the aforementioned study. The authors emphasized that chronic subdural hematoma should be strongly considered in patients with a trauma history presenting with intermittent hemiparesis, even without signs of elevated intracranial pressure. While the natural history is not fully understood, acute subdural hematomas can spontaneously resolve before diagnosis or treatment. Some may progress to chronic subdural hematomas, though these are often distinct histopathologically from chronic subdural hematomas arising de novo. Chronic subdural hematomas are more common in older adults and alcoholics. In patients over 60, common presenting symptoms include headache, altered mental status, hemiparesis, gait disturbance, and aphasia.

Definitive diagnosis of subdural hematoma relies on neuroimaging. CT scans and MRI are effective, with CT scans often being more readily accessible. While specific imaging guidelines for headache are lacking, certain symptoms, such as reversible dementia potentially caused by subdural hematoma, warrant neuroimaging and medical referral. Indications for CT scanning in headache patients include progression of existing headache or new-onset headache, rapid unexplained mental status decline, new focal neurological signs, gait disturbance, and recent head trauma history. If these symptoms are present and a CT scan confirms subdural hematoma, surgical intervention to relieve intracranial pressure is typically indicated.

In the presented case, while the patient experienced temporary relief with soft tissue therapy for about a month, the emergence of focal neurological deficits alongside worsening headaches necessitated immediate referral. Surgical decompression for subdural hematoma usually leads to symptom resolution and low recurrence rates.

Differential Diagnosis: Broadening the Scope Beyond Subdural Hematoma

While subdural hematoma is a critical consideration, the differential diagnosis for headache and neck pain after a car accident is broad. It’s important to consider other conditions, both benign and serious, that can mimic post-traumatic headache or present with similar symptoms. While a patient presenting with headache could have over 300 potential diagnoses, the differential for subdural hematoma itself is somewhat narrower. Conditions to differentiate from subdural hematoma, often requiring neuroimaging, include:

• Epidural Hematoma/Intracranial Hematomas: Traumatic intracranial hematomas can occur in various locations. Epidural hematomas, typically arterial in origin, develop rapidly in the epidural space. They strip the dura from the skull, forming a localized, ovoid mass that compresses the brain but often with less direct brain tissue damage. They may resolve spontaneously over weeks. Epidural hematomas are generally associated with more severe trauma and skull fractures, and carry a higher fatality risk. Symptomatically, they can resemble acute subdural hematomas with rapid onset and progressive symptoms, unlike chronic subdural hematomas. Other intradural hematomas (subarachnoid, intracerebral, intracerebellar) also need differentiation. These are typically associated with more severe trauma and skull fractures. CT scanning is crucial for distinguishing these conditions.

• Cerebrovascular Insults: Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) can present with focal neurological deficits and cognitive impairment, with acute onset over hours to days. Acute subdural hematomas need to be differentiated using neuroimaging. Chronic subdural hematomas develop more gradually over weeks. Cerebrovascular events can occur at the time of trauma or later, requiring practitioners to be vigilant for any changes in mental status or new focal neurological signs and symptoms.

• Intracranial Neoplasms: Brain tumors can also mimic chronic subdural hematoma, presenting with headache, focal neurological signs, and cognitive impairment due to increased intracranial pressure. Clinical differentiation can be challenging. Neuroimaging, particularly MRI (though CT is often used for initial assessment due to accessibility), is necessary to distinguish neoplasms from hematomas.

• Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH): NPH shares symptoms with chronic subdural hematoma, including dementia, gait ataxia, and urinary incontinence. Urinary incontinence is less common in chronic subdural hematoma and can be a differentiating clinical feature. However, neuroimaging is essential for definitive diagnosis.

• Alzheimer’s Dementia: Alzheimer’s disease presents with progressive cognitive decline over months to years. In contrast, acute subdural hematoma has an acute symptom onset, and chronic subdural hematoma develops over weeks. Focal neurological signs and trauma history are less common in Alzheimer’s but are frequent in subdural hematomas.

The presented case highlights a subdural hematoma successfully treated with surgical decompression. While subdural hematomas can occur spontaneously in the elderly, this case is notable for its occurrence following a motor vehicle collision. Although definitive causation cannot be established, the progression of initially mild headache symptoms to neurological deficits is clinically significant. In retrospect, cranial nerve examination, especially in elderly patients presenting with headache post-trauma, should be considered even in the absence of overt neurological complaints at initial presentation.

Conclusion: Vigilance and Timely Referral are Key

Post-traumatic headaches are a common presentation in chiropractic and primary care settings. However, it is imperative to maintain vigilance for rarer but serious conditions in the differential diagnosis, particularly subdural hematoma. Progressive headaches or the development of new signs and symptoms, such as focal neurological deficits, cognitive impairment, or worsening headache intensity, should raise suspicion for secondary headache etiologies. Neuroimaging studies are crucial in identifying the underlying cause, necessitating prompt medical referral and management when serious conditions are suspected. Early recognition and appropriate referral can significantly improve patient outcomes in cases of secondary headaches like subdural hematoma following motor vehicle accidents.

References

References are in the original article and are presumed to be used in this rewritten article. (To fully complete this, the references would need to be copied over).