Introduction
As experts in automotive repair at xentrydiagnosis.store, we understand the critical importance of precise diagnostics. Just as a vehicle’s performance relies on the seamless integration of its systems, the human eye depends on a complex interplay of optical functions for clear vision. Accommodative insufficiency (AI) represents a breakdown in this system, specifically affecting the eye’s ability to focus on near objects. Affecting up to 10% of the population, AI is the most prevalent accommodative dysfunction among individuals who are not presbyopic. This article provides a comprehensive overview of Accommodative Insufficiency Diagnosis, drawing parallels to our diagnostic expertise in automotive repair. We will explore the optics of the eye, the principles of ametropia, differential diagnosis, and management strategies, emphasizing the interprofessional approach to patient care, much like the collaborative efforts in a repair workshop.
Understanding Accommodative Insufficiency
Accommodation, the eye’s ability to adjust its focus for varying distances, is crucial for tasks like reading, detailed repair work, and even using diagnostic tools. This process is achieved by the crystalline lens changing shape, altering its refractive power. In accommodative insufficiency, this focusing mechanism is impaired, leading to difficulties with near vision.
To understand AI diagnosis, it’s essential to grasp the basic optics of the eye. The cornea and crystalline lens work together to refract light and focus it onto the retina, specifically the fovea centralis, for sharp vision. The combined refractive power is approximately +60 diopters, with the cornea contributing the majority. Accommodation is the dynamic adjustment of the crystalline lens’s power, enabling clear vision at different distances. This adjustment is driven by the ciliary muscles: contraction increases lens convexity for near focus, and relaxation flattens the lens for distance vision.
Normally, focusing on near objects triggers the ‘near triad’: accommodation, convergence (eyes turning inward), and miosis (pupil constriction). These reflexes work synergistically for clear, single binocular vision. Dysfunction in one reflex, particularly accommodation, can disrupt this balance. Accommodation and convergence are closely linked, quantified by the Accommodative Convergence to Accommodation (AC/A) ratio. This ratio can be normal, low, or high, depending on the specific accommodative issue.
Accommodative dysfunctions, as classified by Duke-Elder, represent functional anomalies in maintaining clear vision. Accommodative Insufficiency (AI) stands out as a condition where sustaining focus at near distances is challenging. In AI, the accommodative response is often weaker than expected for a given individual’s age, similar to a car engine struggling to perform under load.
Image alt text: Diagram illustrating hyperopia correction with accommodation, showing how the eye compensates for farsightedness by focusing the lens.
Etiology of Accommodative Insufficiency
Just as various factors can contribute to engine trouble, AI can arise from several causes. Uncorrected or under-corrected refractive errors, particularly hyperopia (farsightedness), are significant contributors. When moderate to high hyperopia remains uncorrected, the eye constantly exerts extra accommodative effort to clear vision. This continuous strain can fatigue the ciliary muscles, leading to accommodative insufficiency. Hyperopia, especially facultative hyperopia, is frequently associated with AI. Individuals with hyperopia are already predisposed to near vision difficulties, making them more susceptible to AI symptoms.
This risk group excludes presbyopes (those with age-related loss of accommodation) and individuals with organic conditions like autonomic degenerative diseases, where the underlying cause is different. Prolonged near work, similar to extended periods of demanding driving, can also induce AI. Professions requiring intense near focus, such as technicians working with intricate components, office workers, and students, are at increased risk. Analogously, think of the strain on your eyes when troubleshooting complex wiring diagrams or repair manuals for extended periods.
Certain medications, including parasympatholytics like atropine and sympathomimetic agents, can also induce AI as a side effect. These drugs interfere with the autonomic nervous system’s control of accommodation, much like how certain electrical faults can disrupt a car’s electronic control unit.
Image alt text: Illustration of hyperopia in the eye, showing parallel light rays focusing behind the retina in a relaxed state, necessitating accommodative effort for clear vision.
Epidemiology of Accommodative Insufficiency
Accommodative dysfunction is commonly observed in patients with binocular vision problems, similar to how electrical issues are frequent in vehicles with complex electronic systems. While precise prevalence data for AI in the general population is limited, studies indicate it is the most common symptomatic accommodative dysfunction in non-presbyopic individuals.
Much of the prevalence data focuses on school-aged children (8-15 years). Research indicates a significant overlap between convergence insufficiency (CI) and accommodative dysfunction in children. Meta-analyses highlight accommodative dysfunction and asthenopia (eye strain) as common findings in AI. Symptoms often reported include words appearing to float while reading, difficulty sustaining reading, and eye strain – symptoms familiar to anyone experiencing visual fatigue after prolonged focus.
Children with cerebral palsy also exhibit reduced accommodative amplitudes compared to their peers. Furthermore, reports of accommodative and vergence dysfunction are increasingly common among younger adults (18-35 years). This rise is likely linked to increased near work demands from digital screens, computers, and smartphones, mirroring the increasing complexity and reliance on electronics in modern vehicles, which can lead to new types of malfunctions.
History and Physical Examination for Accommodative Insufficiency Diagnosis
Diagnosing AI, like diagnosing a vehicle problem, starts with gathering information. Individuals with AI typically report blurry vision during near tasks, headaches, visual fatigue, and asthenopic symptoms like eye strain and double vision (diplopia). These symptoms can also have psychological repercussions, such as irritability, reduced concentration during near work, and disinterest in academic tasks, especially in children. Secondary convergence insufficiency can occur with AI, where AI symptoms often dominate.
Similar to how a vehicle’s history (maintenance records, past issues) is crucial, a patient’s medical history is vital. Symptoms may emerge in young children after illness or fever. In adults with vertigo, associated symptoms like ataxia, facial asymmetry, ptosis, anisocoria, exophthalmos, or strabismus warrant investigation for underlying systemic conditions. A history of systemic vascular disease, especially diabetes mellitus, is relevant in adults, as it can affect ciliary ganglion function.
Other historical factors to consider include substance abuse, trauma, infections, anemia, demyelinating diseases, myasthenia gravis (MG), and Grave’s orbitopathy. Just as a mechanic considers various potential causes based on a car’s symptoms and history, a clinician considers a broad differential diagnosis for AI.
Evaluation and Diagnostic Tests for Accommodative Insufficiency
Accurate diagnosis of accommodative and vergence dysfunction requires a comprehensive evaluation, much like a thorough diagnostic process in automotive repair. Correcting any refractive errors is the first step, akin to ensuring basic mechanical adjustments are correct before complex diagnostics. Accommodative function tests should be conducted with the patient’s optimal correction in place. Comparing accommodative parameters to age and sex-matched norms is crucial to determine if they fall within expected ranges.
Several tests are essential for AI diagnosis:
- Negative Relative Accommodation (NRA) and Positive Relative Accommodation (PRA): These tests measure the eye’s ability to accommodate with added plus (NRA) and minus (PRA) lenses, indirectly assessing fusional vergence.
- Near Point of Convergence (NPC): Assesses convergence ability and helps detect convergence insufficiency alongside AI.
- Accommodative Facility: Evaluates the speed and accuracy of accommodative responses to changing focus demands using +/-2.00 diopter flipper lenses. AI patients typically struggle with this test.
- Accommodative Lead and Lag (MEM Retinoscopy): Monocular Estimated Method (MEM) retinoscopy assesses accommodative posture at near. A lag greater than +1.00 DS indicates AI. The fused cross-cylinder (FCC) test is a subjective alternative, but less accurate, especially in children.
- Amplitude of Accommodation (AoA): Measures the maximum accommodative ability, typically reduced in AI. Hofstetter’s formulae (15-0.25 x age) or Donders table provide age-expected norms. AoA can be measured using the push-up or minus lens-to-blur methods.
Image alt text: Clinical photograph demonstrating orthotropia at near and exotropia on cover test, indicative of intermittent exotropia, which can be associated with accommodative issues.
Cover tests (unilateral and alternate) detect manifest or latent deviations (strabismus), which can be measured with prism bars or loose prisms. Horizontal fusional vergence amplitudes (near and far) are measured using base-in (BI) and base-out (BO) prisms, assessing negative (NFV) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) respectively. These findings are compared to Morgan’s norms. Symptomatic AI patients often show suboptimal fusional vergence reserves.
The AC/A ratio is a crucial factor in diagnosing and managing accommodative and vergence dysfunctions. The normal ratio is 4:1. Near phoria measurements with and without gradient lenses (+1.00D for esophoria, -1.00D for exophoria) can determine the AC/A ratio gradient.
Image alt text: Image of prism bars, diagnostic tools used to quantify ocular deviations and strabismus by measuring the prismatic power needed to neutralize eye misalignment.
Treatment and Management of Accommodative Insufficiency
Treating AI, like repairing a vehicle, involves addressing the root cause and implementing corrective measures. Proper refraction and correction of any refractive error are the initial steps. Even minor ametropia can exacerbate AI symptoms. Correcting these small errors can significantly alleviate AI. Plus lenses reduce accommodative demand at near, and are often beneficial in AI management, especially given common findings like low PRA, low AoA, high MEM retinoscopy lag, and difficulty clearing minus lenses in accommodative facility testing.
For myopic patients, prescribing plus lenses might seem counterintuitive. However, bifocals or progressive lenses can be beneficial, especially if they also have AI or accommodative esophoria. Studies suggest this approach may even slow myopic progression.
In cases of organic AI or accommodative paralysis, plus lenses can be prescribed permanently or as needed. Since organic causes can lead to varying levels of dysfunction in each eye, different “add” powers for each eye may be necessary.
Vision therapy offers a promising approach to managing AI, aiming to improve accommodative amplitude and positive fusional vergence reserves. Therapy regimens are tailored to patient age, motivation, and compliance, much like personalized repair plans for vehicles.
Differential Diagnosis of Accommodative Insufficiency
Differential diagnosis is crucial in AI management, just as it is in automotive diagnostics to rule out other potential issues. A key differentiator is that only AI presents with reduced AoA. AI primarily involves difficulty stimulating accommodation, while accommodative excess involves difficulty relaxing accommodation. Accommodative spasm involves issues with both stimulation and relaxation. Accommodative paralysis, caused by systemic diseases or drugs, results in a severe AoA reduction.
Pseudo-convergence insufficiency (pseudo-CI) is an important differential, often representing AI with secondary CI. In true CI, NPC is receded, but AoA is normal. In CI with accommodative issues, accommodative excess is more common. Clinically, NPC may improve in pseudo-CI with +0.75 or +1.00 lenses. In contrast to AI alone, high plus lenses can worsen exophoria in pseudo-CI, making convergence harder. Tailored vision therapy is highly valuable in such cases.
Certain ocular diseases like Adie’s tonic pupil and neurological conditions from infections like syphilis and meningitis can mimic AI symptoms by affecting the parasympathetic pathway. Various drugs can also disrupt the accommodative triad. A detailed patient history is therefore paramount in AI diagnosis, similar to the importance of understanding a vehicle’s history in diagnosing complex problems.
Prognosis of Accommodative Insufficiency
The prognosis for AI is directly related to the extent to which symptoms can be relieved through oculovisual therapy. With appropriate management, many individuals experience significant symptom reduction, much like successful vehicle repairs restore optimal performance.
Complications of Untreated Accommodative Insufficiency
Untreated AI, like neglected vehicle maintenance, can lead to further complications. Similar to how a minor car issue can escalate, AI can worsen and potentially lead to strabismus (misalignment of the eyes). In children, AI can negatively impact academic performance, reflecting the broader impact of unaddressed vision problems on daily life.
Deterrence and Patient Education for Accommodative Insufficiency
Successful vision therapy outcomes, like successful vehicle repairs, depend on patient compliance and understanding. Patients, especially latent hyperopes, may be hesitant to wear spectacles consistently. Parents might question bifocal lens recommendations for children. Clear communication, patient education, and family support are vital to ensure adherence to treatment plans, mirroring the importance of clear communication and trust between a mechanic and vehicle owner.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes in Accommodative Insufficiency
Accommodative and vergence dysfunctions can sometimes indicate underlying serious conditions, just as vehicle malfunctions can signal major mechanical or electrical failures. Patients presenting with AI symptoms, especially with a history of systemic vascular or autoimmune disease or acute neurological deficits, require thorough clinical evaluation. Interprofessional management may be necessary, involving neurological, hematological, pathological, and infectious disease specialists. Key symptoms warranting careful consideration, particularly in triage, include persistent or intermittent diplopia. Cover testing and extraocular muscle function assessment provide valuable diagnostic insights. Acute onset of accommodative and vergence abnormalities necessitate urgent neuro-ophthalmic evaluation, emphasizing the importance of prompt and expert assessment, similar to critical vehicle malfunctions requiring immediate attention from specialized technicians.
Review Questions
(Note: The review questions from the original article are available via the provided link and are not included here to maintain focus on the article content itself.)
References
(Note: The references from the original article are included below for completeness and to maintain academic integrity.)
1.Shoji T, Kato N, Ishikawa S, Ibuki H, Yamada N, Kimura I, Shinoda K. Association between axial length and in vivo human crystalline lens biometry during accommodation: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;64(1):93-101. [PubMed: 31760515]
2.Rehman I, Mahabadi N, Motlagh M, Ali T. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 28, 2023. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Eye Fovea. [PubMed: 29493926]
3.Ayres BD, Rapuano CJ. Refractive power of the cornea. Compr Ophthalmol Update. 2006 Sep-Oct;7(5):243-51; discussion 253-5. [PubMed: 17132433]
4.Grzybowski A, Schachar RA, Pierscionek BK, Levy NS, Schachar IH. Importance of Accommodation and Eye Dominance for Measuring Objective Refractions. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;178:187-188. [PubMed: 28411860]
5.Atchison DA, Varnas SR. Accommodation stimulus and response determinations with autorefractors. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jan;37(1):96-104. [PubMed: 28030883]
6.Ghoushchi VP, Mompeán J, Prieto PM, Artal P. Binocular dynamics of accommodation, convergence, and pupil size in myopes. Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Jun 01;12(6):3282-3295. [PMC free article: PMC8221970] [PubMed: 34221660]
7.Schor CM. A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: simulations of step and frequency responses. Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Apr;69(4):258-69. [PubMed: 1565425]
8.Reynolds MM, Diehl NN, Mohney BG. Outcomes in accommodative esotropia with a high AC/A ratio. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;31(6):3342-3348. [PMC free article: PMC10153757] [PubMed: 33356527]
9.Atiya A, Hussaindeen JR, Kasturirangan S, Ramasubramanian S, Swathi K, Swaminathan M. Frequency of undetected binocular vision anomalies among ophthalmology trainees. J Optom. 2020 Jul-Sep;13(3):185-190. [PMC free article: PMC7301198] [PubMed: 32493674]
10.Hussaindeen JR, Rakshit A, Singh NK, George R, Swaminathan M, Kapur S, Scheiman M, Ramani KK. Prevalence of non-strabismic anomalies of binocular vision in Tamil Nadu: report 2 of BAND study. Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Nov;100(6):642-648. [PubMed: 27859646]
11.Shukla Y. Accommodative anomalies in children. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;68(8):1520-1525. [PMC free article: PMC7640847] [PubMed: 32709767]
12.Balke M, Skjöld G, Lundmark PO. Comparison of Short-Term Effects of Treatment of Accommodative Infacility with Low Plus Addition in Single Vision Rx or Vision Therapy: A Pilot Study. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2022;14:83-92. [PMC free article: PMC9169973] [PubMed: 35677714]
13.Reindel W, Zhang L, Chinn J, Rah M. Evaluation of binocular function among pre- and early-presbyopes with asthenopia. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2018;10:1-8. [PMC free article: PMC6095559] [PubMed: 30214336]
14.Guo DY, Shen YY, Zhu MM, Zhan YY, Wang XW, Xia JH, Jiang B, Gu YS, Long Y. Virtual reality training improves accommodative facility and accommodative range. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(7):1116-1121. [PMC free article: PMC9318093] [PubMed: 35919330]
15.Nunes AF, Monteiro PML, Ferreira FBP, Nunes AS. Convergence insufficiency and accommodative insufficiency in children. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 21;19(1):58. [PMC free article: PMC6385397] [PubMed: 30791877]
16.Hussaindeen JR, Murali A. Accommodative Insufficiency: Prevalence, Impact and Treatment Options. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020;12:135-149. [PMC free article: PMC7494425] [PubMed: 32982529]
17.Wood JM, Chiu CN, Kim GH, Le J, Lee HJ, Nguyen T, Black AA. Refractive blur affects judgement of pedestrian walking direction at night. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 May;41(3):582-590. [PubMed: 33772849]
18.Cufflin MP, Mallen EA. Blur adaptation: clinical and refractive considerations. Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Jan;103(1):104-111. [PubMed: 31801179]
19.Carapancea M. [Ciliospastic myopia and cilio-relaxing asthenopia as manifestations of visual fatigue caused by hypermetropic accomodative overstrain]. Fiziol Norm Patol. 1970 Mar-Apr;16(2):129-35. [PubMed: 5419018]
20.Ntodie M, Saunders KJ, Little JA. Correction of Low-Moderate Hyperopia Improves Accommodative Function for Some Hyperopic Children During Sustained Near Work. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021 Apr 01;62(4):6. [PMC free article: PMC8039472] [PubMed: 33821881]
21.Arnold RW. Pseudo-false positive eye/vision photoscreening due to accommodative insufficiency. A serendipitous benefit for poor readers? Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2004;19(2):75-80. [PubMed: 15180592]
22.Balgos MJTD, Vargas V, Alió JL. Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):121-140. [PMC free article: PMC6169332] [PubMed: 30294526]
23.Randolph SA. Computer Vision Syndrome. Workplace Health Saf. 2017 Jul;65(7):328. [PubMed: 28628753]
24.Makowski AL, Lindgren K, Locke JP. Visual side effects of scopolamine/ dextroamphetamine among parabolic fliers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2011 Jul;82(7):683-8. [PubMed: 21748905]
25.Chen AM, Roberts TL, Cotter SA, Kulp MT, Sinnott LT, Borsting EJ, Tea YC, Jones-Jordan LA, Hertle R, Mitchell GL, Eugene Arnold L, Chase C, Scheiman MM., Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial – Attention and Reading Trial (CITT-ART) Investigator Group. Effectiveness of vergence/accommodative therapy for accommodative dysfunction in children with convergence insufficiency. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Jan;41(1):21-32. [PubMed: 33119180]
26.Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Nabovati P, Shahraki FA, Ostadimoghaddam H, Faghihi M, Aghamirsalim M, Doostdar A, Yekta A. Accommodative insufficiency in a student population in Iran. J Optom. 2019 Jul-Sep;12(3):161-167. [PMC free article: PMC6612034] [PubMed: 29802027]
27.Chang MY, Morrison DG, Binenbaum G, Heidary G, Trivedi RH, Galvin JA, Pineles SL. Home- and Office-Based Vergence and Accommodative Therapies for Treatment of Convergence Insufficiency in Children and Young Adults: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1756-1765. [PubMed: 34172337]
28.DuPrey KM, Webner D, Lyons A, Kucuk CH, Ellis JT, Cronholm PF. Convergence Insufficiency Identifies Athletes at Risk of Prolonged Recovery From Sport-Related Concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug;45(10):2388-2393. [PubMed: 28511593]
29.Watt T, Robertson K, Jacobs RJ. Refractive error, binocular vision and accommodation of children with Down syndrome. Clin Exp Optom. 2015 Jan;98(1):3-11. [PubMed: 25395109]
30.Satgunam P, Datta S, Sumalini R. Near vision in individuals with Down syndrome: a vision screening study. Eye (Lond). 2019 Aug;33(8):1254-1260. [PMC free article: PMC7005683] [PubMed: 30914784]
31.Leat SJ. Reduced accommodation in children with cerebral palsy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Sep;16(5):385-90. [PubMed: 8944183]
32.Franco S, Moreira A, Fernandes A, Baptista A. Accommodative and binocular vision dysfunctions in a Portuguese clinical population. J Optom. 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):271-277. [PMC free article: PMC9537267] [PubMed: 34852966]
33.Jaiswal S, Asper L, Long J, Lee A, Harrison K, Golebiowski B. Ocular and visual discomfort associated with smartphones, tablets and computers: what we do and do not know. Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Sep;102(5):463-477. [PubMed: 30663136]
34.Sterner B, Gellerstedt M, Sjöström A. Accommodation and the relationship to subjective symptoms with near work for young school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Mar;26(2):148-55. [PubMed: 16460315]
35.Abdi S, Brautaset R, Rydberg A, Pansell T. The influence of accommodative insufficiency on reading. Clin Exp Optom. 2007 Jan;90(1):36-43. [PubMed: 17177664]
36.Mikolich JR, Alloush N. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in dextrocardia: case report. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1988 Jun;11(3):140-2. [PubMed: 2971444]
37.Cacho P, García A, Lara F, Seguí MM. Diagnostic signs of accommodative insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Sep;79(9):614-20. [PubMed: 12322932]
38.Hashemi H, Nabovati P, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Rafati S, Ostadimoghaddam H, Razmjoo H, Khabazkhoob M. Convergence Insufficiency in the Geriatric Population. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Jun 01;98(6):613-619. [PubMed: 34081652]
39.López-Artero E, Garzón N, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, García-Montero M. Feasibility of optical quality analysis system for the objective assessment of accommodation insufficiency: a phase 1 study. J Optom. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):287-294. [PMC free article: PMC8258129] [PubMed: 32800453]
40.Scheiman M, Kulp MT, Cotter SA, Lawrenson JG, Wang L, Li T. Interventions for convergence insufficiency: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 02;12(12):CD006768. [PMC free article: PMC8092638] [PubMed: 33263359]
41.Morimoto T, Kanda H, Hirota M, Nishida K, Fujikado T. Insufficient accommodation during binocular near viewing in eyes with intermittent exotropia. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;64(1):77-85. [PubMed: 31707606]
42.Pang Y, Gnanaraj L, Gayleard J, Han G, Hatt SR. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD003737. [PMC free article: PMC8437222] [PubMed: 34516656]
43.Chen Y, Zhang C, Ding C, Tao C, Bao J, Zheng J, Chen H. Repeatability of two subjective accommodative amplitude measurements and agreement with an objective method. Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Jul;102(4):412-417. [PubMed: 30866109]
44.Ren Q, Yue H, Zhou Q. [Effects of orthokeratology lenses on the magnitude of accommodative lag and accommodativeconvergence/accommodation]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Feb;41(2):169-73. [PubMed: 26932215]
45.Adler P, Scally AJ, Barrett BT. Test-retest reproducibility of accommodative facility measures in primary school children. Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Nov;101(6):764-770. [PubMed: 29740867]
46.Chen M, Long Q, Gu H, Hong J. Accommodation changes after visian implantable collamer lens with central hole for high myopia: A STROBE-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(28):e16434. [PMC free article: PMC6641841] [PubMed: 31305467]
47.Fulk GW, Cyert LA, Parker DE. A randomized trial of the effect of single-vision vs. bifocal lenses on myopia progression in children with esophoria. Optom Vis Sci. 2000 Aug;77(8):395-401. [PubMed: 10966065]
48.García-Montero M, Antona B, Barrio AR, Nieto-Zayas C, Martínez-Alberquilla I, Hernández-Verdejo JL. The role of clinical diagnosis criteria on the frequency of accommodative insufficiency. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(4):647-653. [PMC free article: PMC6469550] [PubMed: 31024821]
49.Houston CA, Jone D, Weir CR. An unusual cause of asthenopia: “pseudo-accommodative insufficiency” associated with a high AC:A ratio. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Dec;84(12):1438. [PMC free article: PMC1723365] [PubMed: 11186867]
50.Porcar E, Montalt JC, Pons ÁM, España-Gregori E. Symptomatic accommodative and binocular dysfunctions from the use of flat-panel displays. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(3):501-505. [PMC free article: PMC5861242] [PubMed: 29600186]
51.Wick B, Yothers TL, Jiang BC, Morse SE. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: Part 1. A critical appraisal of the literature. Optometry. 2002 Jan;73(1):11-23. [PubMed: 12363234]
52.Sakai T, Shikishima K, Mizobuchi T, Yoshida M, Kitahara K. Bilateral tonic pupils associated with neurosyphilis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul-Aug;47(4):368-71. [PubMed: 12842205]
53.Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Autonomic drugs and the accommodative system in rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2010 Jan;90(1):104-12. [PMC free article: PMC3637388] [PubMed: 19782072]
54.Ghobadi M, Nabovati P, Hashemi H, Talaei A, Fathi HR, Yekta Y, Ostadimoghaddam H, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M. Accommodative and convergence anomalies in patients with opioid use disorder. Clin Exp Optom. 2022 May;105(4):392-397. [PubMed: 34167446]
55.Musa MJ, Zeppieri M. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): May 11, 2023. Foster Kennedy Syndrome. [PubMed: 35881754]
56.Musa M, Aluyi-Osa G, Zeppieri M. Foster Kennedy Syndrome (FKS): A Case Report. Clin Pract. 2022 Jul 12;12(4):527-532. [PMC free article: PMC9326579] [PubMed: 35892442]
