When Fatal Attraction stormed into theaters in 1987, it was immediately branded as a psychosexual thriller, a cautionary tale of infidelity that petrified men worldwide. The film, on the surface, seemed to condemn a weekend affair turned nightmare, pinning the blame squarely on Alex Forrest (Glenn Close) for her “obsessive” behavior. However, beneath the layers of suspense and eroticism lies a more profound, and arguably more accurate, interpretation: Fatal Attraction is not just a thriller, but a poignant, albeit unintentional, portrayal of a woman struggling with undiagnosed Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Looking back, particularly with a modern understanding of mental health, it’s clear that Alex Forrest’s actions, far from being simply those of a scorned lover, align closely with the symptomatic experiences of BPD. This re-examination allows us to move beyond the simplistic “psycho-bitch” narrative and delve into the complexities of Alex’s character, offering a more compassionate and clinically informed perspective on this cinematic icon.
Initially, like many viewers, my understanding of Fatal Attraction was limited to the thrilling surface narrative. Mental illness, in my perception at the time, was a binary – either mild sadness or severe depression. Conditions like anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, and particularly personality disorders like BPD, were completely off my radar. It wasn’t until years later that I revisited Fatal Attraction and recognized a startlingly different story unfolding – one of a woman whose intense emotional landscape and behavioral patterns strongly suggested Borderline Personality Disorder. Even today, BPD remains a condition shrouded in misunderstanding, making a deeper analysis of Alex Forrest’s character all the more relevant.
Reducing Alex to a caricature of female obsession, driven to madness by a fleeting affair, is a gross oversimplification. In fact, Glenn Close’s nuanced performance subtly embodies various facets of BPD, painting a picture of a woman grappling with intense inner turmoil. While her impulsive sexuality is a prominent aspect, labeling it as mere “obsession” conveniently ignores the equally impulsive behavior of her married partner, Dan Gallagher (Michael Douglas). The film initially draws us into the illicit thrill of their affair, but as it progresses, and the entanglement stretches beyond a casual encounter, deeper, more telling symptoms of BPD begin to surface.
A core feature of BPD is an unstable sense of self, often accompanied by feelings of emptiness and a profound sensitivity to abandonment. Individuals with BPD often struggle to define their own identity, leading them to seek definition through others. This can manifest as an intense craving for intimacy coupled with an equally intense fear of it. They may desperately pursue closeness, only to recoil from it once attained, creating a push-pull dynamic in relationships. The truly heartbreaking aspect of BPD is that individuals experiencing these symptoms often lack the self-awareness to understand their origins, trapped in a cycle of intense emotions and unpredictable behaviors.
Dan Gallagher inadvertently cultivates an environment ripe for Alex’s emotional absorption. He initiates a weekend affair while his family is away, engaging in increasingly intimate activities with Alex – from impulsive sexual encounters to sharing personal interests like opera and even bringing her into familiar spaces like a park he frequents with his family dog. Referring to Alex as “honey” in this context, especially given her vulnerability, sends a potent signal of deeper connection. For someone with BPD, prone to idealization and seeking external validation for their sense of self, Dan’s actions are powerfully misconstrued as the foundation of a meaningful relationship. When Dan abruptly attempts to detach upon his family’s return, he triggers Alex’s deep-seated fear of abandonment, intensifying her BPD symptoms and setting in motion a series of escalating events.
A common pattern in BPD is the idealization of a partner as a “savior” who will complete them and solidify their fragile sense of self. Alex seemingly projects this idealized image onto Dan. When he withdraws, her already precarious sense of self is threatened. Feeling her life devoid of meaning without this perceived connection, she attempts suicide – another recognized symptom of BPD. The wrist-slitting incident is not merely a manipulative act, but a manifestation of deep emotional distress and a desperate plea for connection. Dan’s response, while seemingly driven by decency, is ultimately self-serving; he bandages her wounds and leaves, prioritizing his own self-preservation over seeking genuine help for a woman in crisis.
When her suicide attempt fails to secure Dan’s continued presence, Alex’s desperation intensifies, leading to a cascade of behaviors indicative of the poor interpersonal boundaries often associated with BPD. She relentlessly calls Dan’s workplace, manipulates his secretary to obtain his home number, and even impersonates a potential buyer to gain access to his apartment. Her stalking behavior escalates to his new upstate home, culminating in the infamous scene where she becomes physically ill witnessing Dan’s family by the fireplace with their new pet rabbit – a symbol of the stable family life she desperately craves but feels excluded from. While the audience, positioned to empathize with Dan, interprets these actions as obsessive stalking, they are more accurately understood as manifestations of BPD-related boundary issues and an inability to cope with perceived rejection.
Borderline rage, another critical aspect of BPD, manifests as intense anger that can be directed inward (self-harm, suicidal ideation) or outward. Alex’s externalized aggression is evident when she damages Dan’s car with acid and creates a volatile audio tape filled with mood lability and verbal hostility towards him. These acts, while destructive, are not simply irrational outbursts but rather expressions of the intense emotional dysregulation characteristic of BPD.
The film’s climax, particularly the altered ending, further distorts the portrayal of BPD. In the theatrical release, Alex invades Dan’s home and attacks Beth, ultimately being drowned by Dan and then shot by Beth when she resurfaces. This ending, driven by audience demand for a definitive “punishment” for Alex, sensationalizes her mental illness and reinforces harmful stereotypes. It’s crucial to remember that prior to this violent confrontation, Dan, an attorney, had broken into Alex’s apartment, a physically aggressive and legally questionable act that further blurs the lines of victim and aggressor.
The original ending, however, offered a more nuanced and clinically consistent conclusion. In this version, Alex commits suicide off-screen by slashing her own throat with a knife – the same knife used in a previous altercation with Dan, thus implicating him. Beth finds Alex’s cassette tape, revealing her suicidal threats and exonerating Dan. The scene then flashes back to Alex’s suicide, set to Madame Butterfly, an opera she shared with Dan, adding a layer of tragic irony.
This original ending, while perhaps less cathartic for audiences seeking retribution, is arguably more psychologically resonant and avoids the stigmatization inherent in the altered ending. It acknowledges the internal suffering and self-destructive tendencies often associated with BPD, rather than simply demonizing Alex as a malicious villain deserving of brutal punishment. The studio-mandated ending, while commercially successful, ultimately reinforces the harmful trope of the “psycho woman,” obscuring the underlying mental health issues at play. While externalized aggression can occur in individuals with BPD, it is often directed towards intimates and the correlation between BPD and generalized violence remains under-researched.
The box office success of the altered ending cannot justify its problematic portrayal of mental illness. It perpetuates the stigma surrounding BPD and essentially punishes a mentally ill woman while absolving the male protagonist of his role in the tragedy. By re-examining Fatal Attraction through the lens of Borderline Personality Disorder, we can move beyond the simplistic narrative of a “fatal attraction” and recognize a more complex, and ultimately more human, story of a woman struggling with a serious mental health condition, tragically misunderstood and stigmatized. Revisit Fatal Attraction, particularly with the original ending in mind, and consider drawing your own, more informed conclusions about Alex Forrest and the real tragedy at the heart of this film.
[
