Brachycephaly Diagnosis: An In-depth Guide for Clinicians

Introduction

Brachycephaly, derived from the Greek words for “short head,” is a cranial deformity in infants characterized by a disproportionately wide skull relative to its length. Specifically, it involves a reduced anteroposterior diameter and an increased biparietal diameter.[1] This condition manifests as a flattening of the occiput, making the skull appear shortened from front to back.[2] It’s crucial for healthcare professionals to distinguish between positional brachycephaly, a non-synostotic condition resulting from external pressures, and synostotic brachycephaly, which stems from premature fusion of cranial sutures. The incidence of positional skull deformities in infants has seen a notable increase since 1992.[3, 4] This rise is temporally linked to recommendations promoting supine sleep positioning to reduce Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).[5, 6] However, brachycephaly can also be a manifestation of craniosynostosis, highlighting the importance of accurate Brachycephaly Diagnosis to guide appropriate management and parental counseling.

The infant skull’s primary role is to safeguard the developing brain while simultaneously allowing for its significant growth. The calvaria, or cranial vault, comprises several bones interconnected by fibrous sutures. These sutures—including the metopic, sagittal, coronal, squamosal, and lambdoid—are critical for accommodating brain expansion. Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of one or more of these sutures, disrupts normal skull growth and can lead to various cranial deformities, including synostotic brachycephaly. Understanding the nuances of infant skull anatomy and the potential disruptions caused by craniosynostosis is fundamental to effective brachycephaly diagnosis and management.

Etiology of Brachycephaly

Brachycephaly can be broadly categorized into two primary etiologies: positional (non-synostotic) and synostotic. Accurate brachycephaly diagnosis hinges on differentiating between these two distinct causes.

Positional Brachycephaly: Deformational Factors

Positional, or deformational, brachycephaly arises from external forces acting on the malleable infant skull. At birth, cranial sutures remain unfused, allowing for postnatal brain growth. This pliability, however, makes the infant skull susceptible to deformation from consistent external pressure. The widespread recommendation for supine infant sleep positioning, while crucial for SIDS prevention, can inadvertently lead to symmetrical occipital flattening, resulting in positional brachycephaly.[7] Similarly, consistent lateral positioning can cause deformational plagiocephaly, a related skull deformity characterized by asymmetrical flattening.

Positional brachycephaly diagnosis often considers factors beyond sleep positioning. Intrauterine constraints, such as prolonged labor, abnormal fetal positioning, multiple gestations, oligohydramnios, and uterine anomalies, can also contribute to deformational brachycephaly observed at birth.[8] Recognizing these diverse contributing factors is essential for comprehensive brachycephaly diagnosis and management strategies.

Synostotic Brachycephaly: Craniosynostosis and Genetic Factors

Synostotic brachycephaly is a consequence of craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of cranial sutures. Specifically, bilateral premature fusion of the coronal sutures leads to bicoronal craniosynostosis, resulting in anterior brachycephaly.[10] This type of brachycephaly diagnosis is critical because it often requires surgical intervention to allow for normal brain growth and development.

Understanding the embryological origins of the skull is crucial in grasping craniosynostosis. The skull comprises the neurocranium and viscerocranium. The neurocranium, protecting the brain, further divides into the cranial vault (calvaria) and the chondrocranium (skull base). Calvarial bones ossify via intramembranous ossification, while chondrocranium bones ossify through endochondral ossification. Premature suture fusion disrupts this intricate process.

Genetic factors play a significant role in synostotic brachycephaly. Mutations in genes like fibroblast growth factor receptor type-2 (FGFR-2) and type-3 (FGFR-3), twist homolog-1 (TWIST1), and ephrin-B1 (EFNB1) are implicated in craniosynostosis.[11] FGFR-2 mutations are particularly prominent, although the precise etiology remains complex. Fibroblast growth factors are crucial for bone morphogenesis, influencing cell differentiation, proliferation, and migration.[12] These genetic mutations can manifest as syndromic or non-syndromic craniosynostosis.[10] Syndromic forms are associated with conditions like Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer, Saethre-Chotzen, Antley-Bixler, and Muenke syndromes, all of which may include brachycephaly as a feature. Therefore, genetic evaluation may be considered as part of a comprehensive brachycephaly diagnosis, especially when syndromic features are present.

Epidemiology of Brachycephaly

Positional plagiocephaly and brachycephaly are the most prevalent head shape abnormalities in infants. Studies indicate that they affect a significant proportion of infants in the United States, ranging from 20% to 50%.[1, 15, 16] Approximately 20% of positional plagiocephaly cases are evident at birth, while the majority, around 80%, develop postnatally within the first three months of life as acquired deformational plagiocephaly.[17] Positional plagiocephaly is also observed more frequently in males.[17] A substantial proportion, up to 93%, of infants with positional plagiocephaly also exhibit some degree of torticollis, a condition often underestimated in clinical practice.[18]

Synostotic brachycephaly, specifically resulting from bicoronal synostosis, is less common, occurring in about 3% of non-syndromic synostoses. Its prevalence is higher in syndromic synostosis, estimated at around 0.5 per 10,000 live births.[19, 20] Lambdoid craniosynostosis, another form that can contribute to brachycephaly or plagiocephaly, is relatively rare, accounting for 1% to 9% of all craniosynostosis cases.[21] Understanding these epidemiological figures provides context for the frequency of brachycephaly diagnosis in pediatric practice.

History and Physical Examination in Brachycephaly Diagnosis

A meticulous history and thorough physical examination are paramount in differentiating between non-synostotic (positional brachycephaly or plagiocephaly) and synostotic (bicoronal or bilambdoid synostosis) infant head shape abnormalities. Effective brachycephaly diagnosis begins with a detailed patient history, including:

• Family history: Inquire about any family history of abnormal head shapes or craniosynostosis syndromes.
• Prenatal exposures: Assess for prenatal exposure to teratogens that could contribute to congenital anomalies.
• Onset of abnormality: Determine when the head shape abnormality was first noticed by the parents or caregivers.
• Intrauterine constraints: Explore the possibility of intrauterine fetal head constraints during pregnancy.
• Birth history: Gather details about the labor and delivery process, including duration and any complications.

The physical examination for brachycephaly diagnosis should be systematic and comprehensive. Key components include:

• Head circumference measurement: Track head circumference to monitor growth patterns and identify potential growth restrictions.
• Suture palpation: Palpate cranial sutures for ridging, which can be indicative of synostosis. In synostotic brachycephaly, ridging along the coronal sutures may be palpable.
• Fontanelle examination: Assess fontanelles for size, fullness, and signs of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP).
• Head shape assessment: Observe the head shape from anterior, posterior, lateral, and vertex (top-down) views to characterize the deformity.

Anthropometric measurements using cranial calipers can provide quantitative data on head length, width, and occipitofrontal transcranial diameters, aiding in objective brachycephaly diagnosis. Calculating the cephalic index (ratio of maximum width to maximum length) and cranial vault asymmetry index (percentage difference in diagonal skull dimensions) can further quantify the severity of the head shape abnormality. A complete neurological examination is also crucial to assess for any neurological deficits or signs of increased ICP associated with craniosynostosis.

Clinical Features Differentiating Brachycephaly Types:

• Positional Brachycephaly: Characterized by symmetrical occipital flattening, widened posterior skull, bilateral temporal bossing, and a rounded facial appearance. Sutures are typically normal to palpation without ridging.
• Synostotic Brachycephaly (Bicoronal Synostosis): Often presents with palpable sutural ridging along the coronal sutures. May be associated with turricephaly (towered skull), a forehead that appears tall and narrow, shallow orbits, and a shortened nasal bone. Peri-orbital findings like Harlequin eye sign (elevated supraorbital margin on the affected side) and exophthalmos (protruding eyes) can also be present.[10] In lambdoid synostosis, a sutural trough might be palpated instead of a ridge.

During the physical examination for brachycephaly diagnosis, it is essential to look for associated craniofacial or systemic abnormalities, such as midface hypoplasia, dysmorphic facial features, or limb abnormalities, which may suggest underlying syndromes.[22] Syndromic craniosynostosis can manifest with elevated ICP, obstructive sleep apnea, hearing loss, visual impairment, dental malocclusion, ventricular dilatation, and Chiari malformations.[23] Determining the urgency of treatment, whether immediate or elective, is a critical aspect of brachycephaly diagnosis and management planning.[22]

Differentiating Plagiocephaly Types:

Understanding the nuances of plagiocephaly is also important in the context of brachycephaly diagnosis as positional plagiocephaly is a common differential.

• Positional Plagiocephaly: Produces a parallelogram-shaped head. Features occipital flattening on the affected side, ipsilateral frontal bossing, contralateral occipital bossing, anteriorly displaced ear, and normal mastoid appearance.
• Posterior Plagiocephaly (Lambdoid Craniosynostosis): Results in a trapezoid-shaped head. Similar occipital flattening to positional plagiocephaly but with contralateral frontal and parietal bossing. The ear is posteriorly and inferiorly displaced, and the mastoid is bulging and positioned downwards.
• Bilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: Presents as brachycephaly with inferior and anterior displacement of both ears.[21]
• Bicoronal Craniosynostosis: Leads to turricephaly, as described above.
• Anterior Plagiocephaly (Unilateral Coronal Synostosis): Characterized by unilateral coronal suture synostosis with contralateral forehead bossing.

Evaluation and Diagnostic Modalities for Brachycephaly

While physical examination is the cornerstone of brachycephaly diagnosis, particularly in distinguishing positional from synostotic forms, further evaluation may involve radiological imaging and genetic testing.

Radiological Imaging:

Radiological imaging is typically not required for positional plagiocephaly diagnosis unless the clinical picture is ambiguous. However, in cases of suspected synostotic brachycephaly, radiographic evaluation of the sutures is essential.

• Skull X-rays: May reveal sclerotic margins along the affected suture in synostosis. In some cases, the suture may appear absent.

• Computed Tomography (CT) Scan of the Head: CT imaging with 3D reconstruction is the preferred modality for synostotic brachycephaly diagnosis. It provides detailed visualization of the cranial sutures and bony structures, allowing for definitive confirmation of suture fusion and assessment of intracranial anatomy. CT scans can demonstrate suture thickening in synostotic brachycephaly, particularly in bicoronal synostosis.

• Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): In infants with open fontanelles, ultrasonography can be used as an initial imaging modality. MRI may be considered if there is concern for intracranial abnormalities such as hydrocephalus.

Genetic Testing:

Genetic testing is indicated in brachycephaly diagnosis when syndromic features are present or when there is a strong suspicion of a genetic etiology for craniosynostosis. Genetic analysis can help identify specific gene mutations associated with craniosynostosis syndromes, guiding prognosis and genetic counseling.

Treatment and Management of Brachycephaly

Management strategies for brachycephaly differ significantly based on the underlying etiology. Positional brachycephaly is typically managed conservatively, while synostotic brachycephaly generally requires surgical intervention.

Positional Brachycephaly Management:

The primary approach to positional brachycephaly is conservative management. Prevention is key, emphasizing parental education on “tummy time” from infancy and early repositioning techniques. If torticollis is present, physical therapy exercises should be incorporated. Surgery is not indicated for positional brachycephaly as there is no craniosynostosis. Parental reassurance is crucial, along with education on alternating the infant’s head position during sleep (repositioning education).

Other conservative treatment options include:

• Massage therapy
• Physiotherapy (for torticollis)
• Assistive devices
• Helmet therapy: Helmet therapy is considered for more severe cases of positional brachycephaly that do not respond to repositioning and physiotherapy. However, helmets are expensive, require frequent orthotist visits (every 2 weeks), and carry potential complications such as pressure sores, subcutaneous abscess, and treatment failure.[24] Therefore, prevention and active repositioning remain the mainstay of positional brachycephaly management.

Synostotic Brachycephaly Management:

Synostotic brachycephaly necessitates surgical intervention. The timing of surgery is critical, with urgent intervention required for infants exhibiting signs or symptoms of raised intracranial pressure. For uncomplicated bicoronal synostosis, surgical repair is typically delayed until after 6 months of age, usually performed between 6 and 12 months. Lambdoid synostosis repair is generally recommended between 2 and 6 months of age. Early referral to a craniofacial team is crucial, as delayed referrals may necessitate more extensive surgical procedures with higher complication risks. Endoscopic surgery generally yields the best outcomes when performed before 6 months of age, while the bone is still highly malleable. Endoscopic techniques offer advantages such as reduced patient discomfort, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays.[25]

Established surgical strategies for synostotic brachycephaly include:

• Subtotal or complete cranial vault remodeling: Open surgical procedures involving extensive cranial bone reshaping.
• Cranioplasty (spring-assisted): Utilizing springs to gradually expand the cranial vault.
• Endoscopic suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy: Minimally invasive endoscopic removal of the fused suture, followed by helmet therapy to mold the skull into a normal shape. Helmets are typically fitted 3 to 7 days post-endoscopic surgery and may be worn for up to a year postoperatively.[26]

Open surgical repair is generally employed for infants between 4 and 12 months of age. Open cranial vault reconstructions typically begin with a bicoronal skin incision. Lambdoid craniosynostosis repair often involves biparietal craniotomies with barrel staving of the frontal and occipital bones. Coronal craniosynostosis repair utilizes anterior cranial vault remodeling with orbital rim advancement, including bifrontal craniotomy, orbital bandeau creation, and bifrontal advancement.[27]

Differential Diagnosis of Brachycephaly

Synostotic brachycephaly, particularly bicoronal and bilambdoid synostosis, may be associated with various syndromic conditions. A systematic physical examination is crucial to identify potential etiological clues and differentiate syndromic from non-syndromic craniosynostosis. Key syndromes in the differential diagnosis of synostotic brachycephaly include:

• Crouzon Syndrome: Bicoronal synostosis with brachycephaly, proptosis, midface hypoplasia, malocclusion, and upturned nose.[28] Intelligence is typically normal.
• Apert Syndrome: Bicoronal synostosis with syndactyly of digits 2, 3, and 4.[29] May involve intellectual disability and midface hypoplasia.
• Pfeiffer Syndrome: Craniosynostosis, broad and medially deviated thumbs and great toes, proptosis, and conductive hearing loss.[30] Subtypes exist with varying severity, including Cloverleaf skull in Type 2.
• Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome: Craniosynostosis, syndactyly, low-set hairline, and facial asymmetry.[31]
• Carpenter Syndrome: Craniosynostosis, syndactyly or polydactyly, potential short stature, and congenital heart defects.[32]
• Antley-Bixler Syndrome: Craniosynostosis, proptosis, low-set ears, midface hypoplasia, radiohumeral or radioulnar synostosis, arachnodactyly, and joint contractures.
• Muenke Syndrome: Coronal craniosynostosis, carpal synostosis, hearing loss, developmental delay, cone-shaped epiphysis, and high narrow palate.
• Beare-Stevenson Cutis Gyrata Syndrome: Craniosynostosis, cutis gyrata, acanthosis nigricans, choanal atresia, pancreatic abnormalities, and earlobe aplasia/hypoplasia.
• Jackson-Weiss Syndrome: Craniosynostosis, midfacial hypoplasia, broad great toes, or foot bone malformations/fusions.

Prognosis of Brachycephaly

The prognosis for brachycephaly depends largely on the etiology. Positional brachycephaly, being the most common infant head shape abnormality, generally has an excellent prognosis. Parental reassurance and conservative management with repositioning education are usually sufficient, with significant improvement observed as infants reach developmental milestones.[16] Refractory positional brachycephaly cases may benefit from helmet therapy.

Synostotic brachycephaly prognosis is also generally good, particularly with early brachycephaly diagnosis and referral to a craniofacial team. Early intervention may prevent the need for more extensive surgical procedures. Cosmetic outcomes following non-syndromic craniosynostosis repair, whether open or endoscopic, are typically excellent, with low revision rates.[33]

Complications of Brachycephaly

Positional brachycephaly primarily raises aesthetic concerns. There is limited evidence to suggest it negatively impacts neurological development. Conversely, untreated synostotic brachycephaly can have more significant consequences. It may impede brain growth, potentially leading to elevated intracranial pressure in infants and intracranial hypertension in older, untreated individuals.[34] Cognitive and behavioral difficulties have been suggested to be linked to elevated ICP in craniosynostosis, although this remains debated in research.[10, 35, 36, 37] The long-term neurodevelopmental impact of surgical repair for craniosynostosis is also an ongoing area of study.

Consultations for Brachycephaly

Pediatricians are typically the first point of contact for brachycephaly diagnosis in infants. Suspected synostotic brachycephaly cases necessitate specialist consultation with a craniofacial team. This team typically comprises a pediatric neurosurgeon, a craniofacial plastic surgeon, and, in some cases, a geneticist. Early consultation ensures timely and appropriate management planning.

Deterrence and Patient Education for Brachycephaly

Educating parents about preventive measures for positional brachycephaly is crucial. This includes promoting tummy time and varied positioning for infants. Parents concerned about their infant’s head shape should be encouraged to consult their pediatrician promptly. If craniosynostosis is suspected, the pediatrician can facilitate specialist referral. For positional plagiocephaly, thorough patient counseling and reassurance are essential.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes in Brachycephaly Management

Effective brachycephaly diagnosis and management require a collaborative interprofessional team approach. Accurate differentiation between non-synostotic and synostotic brachycephaly through history and physical examination is the first critical step. Most positional brachycephaly cases improve with conservative management, with referral for helmet therapy considered in refractory cases. Synostotic brachycephaly requires early referral to a craniofacial team for surgical management. A coordinated, interprofessional approach optimizes patient outcomes in brachycephaly care.

Review Questions

(Original article’s review questions would be included here if needed, but the prompt does not require them)

References

1.Collett BR, Leroux BG, Wallace ER, Gallagher E, Shao J, Speltz ML. Head shape at age 36 months among children with and without a history of positional skull deformation. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Mar;21(3):204-213. [PMC free article: PMC5832631] [PubMed: 29303454]

2.Baird LC, Klimo P, Flannery AM, Bauer DF, Beier A, Durham S, Lin AY, McClung-Smith C, Mitchell L, Nikas D, Tamber MS, Tyagi R, Mazzola C. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of Patients With Positional Plagiocephaly: The Role of Physical Therapy. Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):E630-E631. [PubMed: 27776088]

3.van Cruchten C, Feijen MMW, van der Hulst RRWJ. Demographics of Positional Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly; Risk Factors and Treatment. 2021 Nov-Dec 01J Craniofac Surg. 32(8):2736-2740. [PubMed: 34231510]

4.Positional plagiocephaly and sleep positioning: An update to the joint statement on sudden infant death syndrome. Paediatr Child Health. 2001 Dec;6(10):788-93. [PMC free article: PMC2805995] [PubMed: 20084156]

5.Turk AE, McCarthy JG, Thorne CH, Wisoff JH. The “back to sleep campaign” and deformational plagiocephaly: is there cause for concern? J Craniofac Surg. 1996 Jan;7(1):12-8. [PubMed: 9086896]

6.Pelligra R, Doman G, Leisman G. A reassessment of the SIDS Back to Sleep Campaign. ScientificWorldJournal. 2005 Jul 21;5:550-7. [PMC free article: PMC5936520] [PubMed: 16075152]

7.Linz C, Kunz F, Böhm H, Schweitzer T. Positional Skull Deformities. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Aug 07;114(31-32):535-542. [PMC free article: PMC5624275] [PubMed: 28835328]

8.Marshall JM, Shahzad F. Safe Sleep, Plagiocephaly, and Brachycephaly: Assessment, Risks, Treatment, and When to Refer. Pediatr Ann. 2020 Oct 01;49(10):e440-e447. [PubMed: 33034660]

9.Kuratani S. The neural crest and origin of the neurocranium in vertebrates. Genesis. 2018 Jun;56(6-7):e23213. [PubMed: 30134067]

10.Dias MS, Samson T, Rizk EB, Governale LS, Richtsmeier JT., SECTION ON NEUROLOGIC SURGERY, SECTION ON PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY. Identifying the Misshapen Head: Craniosynostosis and Related Disorders. Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3) [PubMed: 32868470]

11.Wilkie AOM, Johnson D, Wall SA. Clinical genetics of craniosynostosis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017 Dec;29(6):622-628. [PMC free article: PMC5681249] [PubMed: 28914635]

12.Ornitz DM, Marie PJ. Fibroblast growth factors in skeletal development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019;133:195-234. [PubMed: 30902253]

13.Sawh-Martinez R, Steinbacher DM. Syndromic Craniosynostosis. Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;46(2):141-155. [PubMed: 30851747]

14.Li H, Zhao A, Xie M, Chen L, Wu H, Shen Y, Wang H. Antley-Bixler syndrome arising from compound heterozygotes in the P450 oxidoreductase gene: a case report. Transl Pediatr. 2021 Dec;10(12):3309-3318. [PMC free article: PMC8753478] [PubMed: 35070845]

15.Hutchison BL, Hutchison LA, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA. Plagiocephaly and brachycephaly in the first two years of life: a prospective cohort study. Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):970-80. [PubMed: 15466093]

16.Roby BB, Finkelstein M, Tibesar RJ, Sidman JD. Prevalence of positional plagiocephaly in teens born after the “Back to Sleep” campaign. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 May;146(5):823-8. [PubMed: 22241785]

17.Robinson S, Proctor M. Diagnosis and management of deformational plagiocephaly. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Apr;3(4):284-95. [PubMed: 19338406]

18.Rogers GF, Oh AK, Mulliken JB. The role of congenital muscular torticollis in the development of deformational plagiocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Feb;123(2):643-652. [PubMed: 19182625]

19.Boulet SL, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA. A population-based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989-2003. Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Apr 15;146A(8):984-91. [PubMed: 18344207]

20.Cornelissen M, Ottelander Bd, Rizopoulos D, van der Hulst R, Mink van der Molen A, van der Horst C, Delye H, van Veelen ML, Bonsel G, Mathijssen I. Increase of prevalence of craniosynostosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;44(9):1273-9. [PubMed: 27499511]

21.Muakkassa KF, Hoffman HJ, Hinton DR, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP, Ash J. Lambdoid synostosis. Part 2: Review of cases managed at The Hospital for Sick Children, 1972-1982. J Neurosurg. 1984 Aug;61(2):340-7. [PubMed: 6737059]

22.Johnson D, Wilkie AO. Craniosynostosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Apr;19(4):369-76. [PMC free article: PMC3060331] [PubMed: 21248745]

23.Cohen MM. Craniosynostosis update 1987. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1988;4:99-148. [PubMed: 3144990]

24.Wilbrand JF, Wilbrand M, Malik CY, Howaldt HP, Streckbein P, Schaaf H, Kerkmann H. Complications in helmet therapy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Jun;40(4):341-6. [PubMed: 21741852]

25.Vogel TW, Woo AS, Kane AA, Patel KB, Naidoo SD, Smyth MD. A comparison of costs associated with endoscope-assisted craniectomy versus open cranial vault repair for infants with sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Mar;13(3):324-31. [PubMed: 24410127]

26.Barone CM, Jimenez DF. Endoscopic approach to coronal craniosynostosis. Clin Plast Surg. 2004 Jul;31(3):415-22, vi. [PubMed: 15219748]

27.Nowinski D, Di Rocco F, Renier D, SainteRose C, Leikola J, Arnaud E. Posterior cranial vault expansion in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Comparison of current techniques. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Sep;28(9):1537-44. [PubMed: 22872270]

28.Conrady CD, Patel BC. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 7, 2023. Crouzon Syndrome. [PubMed: 30085540]

29.Conrady CD, Patel BC, Sharma S. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jun 1, 2023. Apert Syndrome. [PubMed: 30085535]

30.Das JM, Winters R. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jul 4, 2023. Pfeiffer Syndrome. [PubMed: 30422477]

31.Abulezz TA, Allam KA, Wan DC, Lee JC, Kawamoto HK. Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome: A Report of 7 Patients and Review of the Literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Sep;85(3):251-255. [PubMed: 32487807]

32.Bouaré F, Noureldine MHA, Hajhouji F, Ghannane H, Jallo GI, Ait Benali S. Complex craniosynostosis in the context of Carpenter’s syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Apr;38(4):831-835. [PubMed: 34244844]

33.Simpson A, Wong AL, Bezuhly M. Surgical Correction of Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Concepts and Controversies. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jan;78(1):103-110. [PubMed: 26808733]

34.Judy BF, Swanson JW, Yang W, Storm PB, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA, Heuer GG, Lang SS. Intraoperative intracranial pressure monitoring in the pediatric craniosynostosis population. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Nov 01;22(5):475-480. [PubMed: 30074450]

35.Knight SJ, Anderson VA, Spencer-Smith MM, Da Costa AC. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants and children with single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review. Dev Neuropsychol. 2014;39(3):159-86. [PubMed: 24742309]

36.Arnaud E, Renier D, Marchac D. Prognosis for mental function in scaphocephaly. J Neurosurg. 1995 Sep;83(3):476-9. [PubMed: 7666225]

37.Gault DT, Renier D, Marchac D, Jones BM. Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Sep;90(3):377-81. [PubMed: 1513883]