Introduction
Exertional compartment syndrome (ECS) is a condition characterized by increased pressure within muscle compartments during exercise. Often underdiagnosed, it’s crucial to distinguish between its two main forms: chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) and acute exertional compartment syndrome (AECS). While AECS is a surgical emergency demanding immediate intervention, CECS, though benign, significantly impacts an individual’s activity levels and quality of life. Accurate Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome Diagnosis is the first step towards effective management and relief. This article delves into the intricacies of CECS, focusing on its diagnosis, symptoms, and the importance of timely identification.
Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is marked by recurrent episodes of pain, tingling, or numbness that predictably arise with exercise and subside with rest. This cyclical nature, stemming from reversible ischemia as compartment pressures normalize post-activity, distinguishes it from acute conditions. Despite not being immediately life-threatening, the persistent and activity-limiting symptoms of CECS often lead patients to consider surgical solutions like fasciotomy.
Acute exertional compartment syndrome (AECS), in contrast, is a rare but serious condition that requires prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment. Similar to acute compartment syndrome (ACS), AECS involves rapidly escalating pressure within muscle compartments, potentially leading to irreversible muscle and nerve damage within hours. Both ECS types commonly affect the lower leg, but can also occur in the forearm, thigh, or hand. Recognizing the subtle differences and understanding the diagnostic pathways for both CECS and AECS is paramount for clinicians to ensure timely and appropriate intervention.
Etiology of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
Understanding the etiology of chronic exertional compartment syndrome is key to accurate chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis. Unlike acute compartment syndrome, ECS, and particularly CECS, is not triggered by a specific traumatic event. The underrecognition of ECS, especially AECS, often stems from its atraumatic presentation.
Several factors contribute to the development of CECS. During physical activity, blood flow and fluid volume to muscle compartments increase, causing them to swell by as much as 20%. In individuals with CECS, this normal swelling leads to an abnormal elevation of pressure within the tight musculofascial compartments. This elevated pressure restricts muscle expansion and eventually compromises blood flow when it surpasses the capillary perfusion pressure. This cascade of events results in pain, and sometimes, subtle motor weakness and sensory changes (paresthesias) in the distribution of affected nerves. For instance, CECS in the anterior and lateral compartments of the lower leg may manifest as pain, tingling, and reduced sensation on the top of the foot, indicating superficial peroneal nerve involvement.
The physiological consequences of this increased intracompartmental pressure involve reduced oxygen supply to muscle cells (myocytes), potentially leading to muscle cell death (myonecrosis) and neurological damage. The specific symptoms experienced vary depending on the affected compartment and the muscles and nerves involved.
Other contributing factors to CECS include overuse injuries and repetitive activities that cause tissue degeneration or scar tissue formation due to microtrauma. Another predisposing factor can be reduced elasticity of the fascia, the connective tissue surrounding muscle compartments. Less elastic fascia can lead to nerve compression and quicker elevation of compartment pressures beyond the capillary perfusion pressure. Research suggests that CECS may be related to increased fluid content within the compartments, impairing muscle and nerve function in the confined space. Alternatively, some theories propose “neurogenic claudication,” where nerve perfusion is compromised due to reduced capillary flow from elevated pressures. Regardless of the precise mechanism, elevated intracompartmental pressures during repetitive activities, such as running, dancing, speed skating, and military training, are central to the pathology of CECS.
Epidemiology of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
Chronic exertional compartment syndrome, while not rare, is often an overlooked cause of exercise-induced leg pain. Among active individuals presenting with exercise-related leg pain, CECS is estimated to be the diagnosis in approximately 33% of cases.
Studies focusing on military populations have shown an average annual incidence of CECS around 0.49 per 1000 person-years at risk. CECS is particularly prevalent among young adult athletes participating in endurance sports like running, soccer, field hockey, and lacrosse. The anterior compartment of the lower leg is most commonly affected, accounting for up to 70% of CECS cases. Other studies indicate that both the anterior and deep posterior compartments are frequently involved (each around 25%), with simultaneous involvement of both compartments occurring in 8-10% of cases. Bilateral limb involvement is reported in a significant proportion of symptomatic athletes, ranging from 37% to 82%.
A large retrospective study examining over 1400 patients with lower extremity pain who underwent dynamic intracompartmental pressure measurements found that nearly half (698 patients) were diagnosed with CECS. This study highlighted that CECS prevalence peaks in the 20-25 age group, is more common in males, and frequently affects both legs. It is strongly associated with sports like running and skating, with higher activity intensity correlating with increased likelihood of CECS. Importantly, CECS can also occur in individuals not actively engaged in sports, emphasizing the need for broad awareness in chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis.
History and Physical Examination in Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome Diagnosis
A high degree of clinical suspicion is essential for accurate chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis, particularly to differentiate it from AECS and rule out acute compartment syndrome. AECS, being a hybrid of ACS and CECS, is often misdiagnosed or diagnosed with delay. Patients with AECS typically present with persistent, non-specific leg pain following exertion or sports activities, which, unlike CECS, does not reliably subside with rest. While CECS is often considered a diagnosis of exclusion, AECS must be ruled out first, primarily through compartment pressure measurements.
The cornerstone of chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis lies in a detailed clinical history. Key historical features include a patient’s description of pain during strenuous activity, localized to a specific compartment, and the rapid resolution of pain symptoms upon cessation of activity. Patients often describe the discomfort as squeezing, cramping, aching, or burning, typically starting within 15-20 minutes of exercise such as running or marching. The pain usually resolves completely with rest, although the duration of relief may vary. Bilateral symptoms are common, occurring in 70-95% of cases.
Physical examination findings for CECS are often unremarkable, especially if the patient is evaluated outside of an exercise session. Ideally, physical examination should be performed both before and immediately after exercise when CECS is suspected. Post-exercise, the affected compartment may exhibit tenderness, bulging, or a feeling of tightness. Passive stretching of the muscles within the involved compartment may provoke pain. Neurological findings, such as decreased sensation, paresthesias, or weakness, may also be present, although they are often subtle.
Formal chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis is confirmed through compartment pressure measurements taken before and after exercise, often using the Stryker pressure monitoring system. Baseline pressure measurements are obtained with the patient at rest in a supine position. The patient is then asked to perform exercise in a controlled setting, typically running on a treadmill at a minimal incline, until symptoms are significantly provoked. After symptom onset, the patient rests for 5 minutes, and compartment pressures are re-measured.
Evaluation and Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
Evaluation is crucial for confirming suspected chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis. History taking plays a vital role in raising suspicion, as CECS can be easily missed or overlooked. Once suspected, the definitive diagnosis relies on dynamic intra-compartmental pressure measurements taken at rest and following exercise.
The Pedowitz criteria are widely used to objectively diagnose CECS in each compartment of interest. These criteria include:
- Resting pressure: ≥ 15 mmHg
- 1-minute post-exercise pressure: ≥ 30 mmHg in any compartment
- 5-minute post-exercise pressure: > 20 mmHg
Meeting any one of these pressure criteria in conjunction with a consistent clinical history supports a chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis. It is important to note that these pressure measurements should be interpreted in the context of the patient’s symptoms and clinical presentation.
Treatment and Management of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
In contrast to AECS, which necessitates emergent fasciotomy, chronic exertional compartment syndrome management typically begins with conservative, non-operative approaches. However, surgical intervention, specifically fasciotomy, is often the definitive treatment for CECS when conservative measures fail.
Initial management of CECS typically involves a 1-3 month trial of non-operative treatments. Surgical options are usually considered and discussed with the patient, especially athletes, regarding the optimal timing in relation to their activity goals and requirements.
Conservative management strategies for CECS include:
- Rest and Activity Modification: Reducing or avoiding activities that provoke symptoms is a primary step.
- Stretching: Regular stretching exercises targeting the affected muscle compartments may provide some relief.
- Orthotics: In some cases, orthotics may help to correct biomechanical issues that contribute to CECS.
- Physical Therapy: A physical therapy program can focus on stretching, strengthening, and gait retraining. However, it’s important to note that conservative measures are often ineffective in providing long-term relief for CECS.
Other non-operative modalities that may be considered, but with limited evidence of efficacy, include:
- NSAIDs (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs): These may help manage pain but do not address the underlying pressure issue.
- Botulinum Toxin Injections: Some studies have explored botulinum toxin injections to reduce muscle compartment pressure, but their effectiveness is limited and not widely established.
- Gait Retraining: Modifying running or walking mechanics may reduce stress on specific compartments; however, its impact on CECS is not definitively proven.
For refractory cases of CECS, or after a sufficient trial of non-operative treatments, surgical management is typically recommended. Open fasciotomy, a surgical procedure to release the fascia surrounding the affected muscle compartment, is the most common and generally effective treatment. Minimally invasive endoscopic fasciotomy techniques are also available, aiming to reduce incision size. However, complication rates are reported to be similar between open and endoscopic techniques. The goal of fasciotomy is to create more space within the muscle compartment, thereby reducing pressure and improving blood flow, ultimately alleviating symptoms and allowing return to activity.
Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
When considering chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis, it’s essential to differentiate it from other conditions that can cause similar symptoms, particularly exercise-induced leg pain. Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS), commonly known as shin splints, is frequently misdiagnosed as CECS or vice versa.
Other conditions to consider in the differential diagnosis include:
-
Vascular Pathologies:
- Intermittent Claudication: Pain due to peripheral artery disease, characterized by predictable pain with exercise relieved by rest, similar to CECS. However, vascular claudication is often associated with risk factors for vascular disease and may present with absent or diminished peripheral pulses.
- Popliteal Artery Entrapment: Compression of the popliteal artery behind the knee, which can cause exertional leg pain.
-
Tibial Stress Fractures: Stress fractures of the tibia can also cause exercise-related leg pain. Pain from stress fractures is typically more localized to a bony point and may be present even at rest, unlike the activity-dependent pain of CECS.
-
Tendon Pathologies: Tendinitis, tendinosis, or tendon rupture can cause pain in the lower leg that may be exacerbated by exercise. Physical examination and targeted palpation can often help differentiate tendon issues from CECS.
-
Nerve Entrapment: Conditions like nerve entrapment syndromes in the lower leg can mimic CECS symptoms. However, nerve entrapment often presents with more specific neurological findings and may not be as directly related to exercise intensity as CECS.
A thorough history, physical examination, and, when indicated, compartment pressure measurements are crucial to accurately differentiate CECS from these other conditions and establish the correct chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis.
Prognosis of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
The prognosis for patients with chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis is generally favorable, especially with appropriate management. Patients with isolated anterior or lateral compartment involvement tend to have better outcomes compared to those with deep posterior compartment involvement.
Systematic reviews of surgical outcomes for CECS have reported success rates around 66% and patient satisfaction rates of 84% in the short to mid-term follow-up after fasciotomy. Studies in pediatric populations have shown return-to-sports rates as high as 79.5% following surgery, with a small percentage (around 18.8%) requiring revision surgery.
Prognosis is influenced by the specific compartments involved. Anterior compartment CECS, being the most common, often has better surgical outcomes compared to multi-compartment involvement. Single compartment CECS also tends to have a higher surgical success rate than cases involving multiple compartments. Early and accurate chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis and timely intervention contribute to improved prognosis and better patient outcomes.
Complications of Exertional Compartment Syndrome
While CECS itself is considered a benign condition with symptoms resolving with rest, it’s crucial to differentiate it from acute exertional compartment syndrome (AECS), which is a surgical emergency. AECS, like CECS, is associated with repetitive activities such as endurance sports and military training, and it is not related to acute trauma. AECS typically affects adolescents and young men, possibly due to developing muscle mass within restrictive fascial spaces.
The major complication of AECS is irreversible muscle cell death (myonecrosis) and nerve injury due to prolonged elevated compartment pressures. Delayed diagnosis and intervention are common in AECS due to its rarity and lack of familiarity among clinicians. The key to preventing complications in AECS is a high index of suspicion and prompt recognition. Examination findings in AECS may include pain out of proportion to the apparent injury and significant pain with passive stretching of the affected compartment. Compartment pressure measurements are essential to confirm the diagnosis. Pressures of 30 mmHg or higher, or a delta pressure (diastolic blood pressure minus compartment pressure) less than 30 mmHg, are indications for immediate fasciotomy to prevent irreversible damage. If a dedicated compartment pressure monitor is unavailable, arterial line monitoring connected to a needle or catheter can be used as an alternative to measure pressures in emergency situations.
Deterrence and Patient Education for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
Knowledge and awareness are paramount in managing and deterring the impact of exertional compartment syndrome. Given that both CECS and AECS can be underdiagnosed and easily missed, educating both healthcare providers and patients is crucial.
Patients experiencing exertional extremity pain that consistently resolves with rest should be educated to consider CECS as a possible diagnosis and seek medical evaluation. Similarly, individuals with atraumatic extremity pain accompanied by pain out of proportion, pain on passive stretch, and tenderness in muscle compartments should be educated about AECS and the need for urgent medical attention. Increased awareness and patient education can lead to earlier chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis and more timely management, improving outcomes and quality of life.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes in Exertional Compartment Syndrome
Effective management of exertional compartment syndrome, including accurate chronic exertional compartment syndrome diagnosis, requires a collaborative approach across various healthcare disciplines. Physical therapists, advanced practice providers, nurses, and physicians in primary care, emergency medicine, sports medicine, and orthopedics may encounter patients with ECS. Interprofessional collaboration and communication are essential to ensure optimal outcomes for these patients. [Level V evidence].
Primary care and emergency medicine practitioners play a critical role in initial recognition and referral, particularly in the limb-threatening AECS. Orthopedic surgeons are typically involved for definitive diagnosis confirmation and surgical management with fasciotomy when indicated. A coordinated interprofessional team approach ensures timely and appropriate care, from initial suspicion to definitive treatment and rehabilitation, leading to improved patient outcomes in exertional compartment syndrome.
Review Questions
(Note: Review questions from the original article are omitted as per instructions.)
References
(Note: References from the original article are included as per instructions.)
1.Varacallo M, Shirey L, Kavuri V, Harding S. Acute compartment syndrome of the hand secondary to propofol extravasation. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Jun;47:1-2. [PubMed: 29476968]
2.Drexler M, Rutenberg TF, Rozen N, Warschawski Y, Rath E, Chechik O, Rachevsky G, Morag G. Single minimal incision fasciotomy for the treatment of chronic exertional compartment syndrome: outcomes and complications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jan;137(1):73-79. [PubMed: 27670876]
3.de Bruijn JA, van Zantvoort APM, Hundscheid HPH, Hoogeveen AR, Teijink JAW, Scheltinga MR. Superficial Peroneal Nerve Injury Risk During a Semiblind Fasciotomy for Anterior Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Leg: An Anatomical and Clinical Study. Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Mar;40(3):343-351. [PubMed: 30466306]
4.Livingston K, Glotzbecker M, Miller PE, Hresko MT, Hedequist D, Shore BJ. Pediatric Nonfracture Acute Compartment Syndrome: A Review of 39 Cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Oct-Nov;36(7):685-90. [PubMed: 26019026]
5.Chatterjee R. Diagnosis of chronic exertional compartment syndrome in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Aug;65(637):e560-2. [PMC free article: PMC4513745] [PubMed: 26212853]
6.Gill CS, Halstead ME, Matava MJ. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the leg in athletes: evaluation and management. Phys Sportsmed. 2010 Jun;38(2):126-32. [PubMed: 20631472]
7.McKinney B, Gaunder C, Schumer R. Acute Exertional Compartment Syndrome with Rhabdomyolysis: Case Report and Review of Literature. Am J Case Rep. 2018 Feb 08;19:145-149. [PMC free article: PMC5813520] [PubMed: 29415981]
8.Puranen J. The medial tibial syndrome: exercise ischaemia in the medial fascial compartment of the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1974 Nov;56-B(4):712-5. [PubMed: 4452718]
9.Braver RT. Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2016 Apr;33(2):219-33. [PubMed: 27013413]
10.Joubert SV, Duarte MA. Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in a Healthy Young Man. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):139-44. [PMC free article: PMC4913117] [PubMed: 27330517]
11.Hope MJ, McQueen MM. Acute compartment syndrome in the absence of fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Apr;18(4):220-4. [PubMed: 15087965]
12.Amendola A, Rorabeck CH, Vellett D, Vezina W, Rutt B, Nott L. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in exertional compartment syndromes. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;18(1):29-34. [PubMed: 2301688]
13.Waterman BR, Liu J, Newcomb R, Schoenfeld AJ, Orr JD, Belmont PJ. Risk factors for chronic exertional compartment syndrome in a physically active military population. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2545-9. [PubMed: 23911700]
14.Breen DT, Foster J, Falvey E, Franklyn-Miller A. Gait re-training to alleviate the symptoms of anterior exertional lower leg pain: a case series. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Feb;10(1):85-94. [PMC free article: PMC4325292] [PubMed: 25709867]
15.Davis DE, Raikin S, Garras DN, Vitanzo P, Labrador H, Espandar R. Characteristics of patients with chronic exertional compartment syndrome. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Oct;34(10):1349-54. [PubMed: 23669162]
16.Qvarfordt P, Christenson JT, Eklöf B, Ohlin P, Saltin B. Intramuscular pressure, muscle blood flow, and skeletal muscle metabolism in chronic anterior tibial compartment syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Oct;(179):284-90. [PubMed: 6617028]
17.Martens MA, Moeyersoons JP. Acute and recurrent effort-related compartment syndrome in sports. Sports Med. 1990 Jan;9(1):62-8. [PubMed: 2408118]
18.Detmer DE, Sharpe K, Sufit RL, Girdley FM. Chronic compartment syndrome: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 1985 May-Jun;13(3):162-70. [PubMed: 4014531]
19.Schepsis AA, Gill SS, Foster TA. Fasciotomy for exertional anterior compartment syndrome: is lateral compartment release necessary? Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(4):430-5. [PubMed: 10424211]
20.de Bruijn JA, van Zantvoort APM, van Klaveren D, Winkes MB, van der Cruijsen-Raaijmakers M, Hoogeveen AR, Teijink JAW, Scheltinga MR. Factors Predicting Lower Leg Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in a Large Population. Int J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;39(1):58-66. [PubMed: 29126337]
21.Tucker AK. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the leg. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2010 Sep 02;3(1-4):32-7. [PMC free article: PMC2941579] [PubMed: 21063498]
22.Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR, Mubarak SJ, Gershuni DH. Modified criteria for the objective diagnosis of chronic compartment syndrome of the leg. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;18(1):35-40. [PubMed: 2301689]
23.Diebal AR, Gregory R, Alitz C, Gerber JP. Effects of forefoot running on chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a case series. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;6(4):312-21. [PMC free article: PMC3230159] [PubMed: 22163093]
24.Diebal AR, Gregory R, Alitz C, Gerber JP. Forefoot running improves pain and disability associated with chronic exertional compartment syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1060-7. [PubMed: 22427621]
25.Beck JJ, Tepolt FA, Miller PE, Micheli LJ, Kocher MS. Surgical Treatment of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in Pediatric Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2644-2650. [PubMed: 27365374]
26.Vajapey S, Miller TL. Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a review of current literature. Phys Sportsmed. 2017 Nov;45(4):391-398. [PubMed: 28952402]
27.Campano D, Robaina JA, Kusnezov N, Dunn JC, Waterman BR. Surgical Management for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Leg: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jul;32(7):1478-86. [PubMed: 27020462]
28.Khan IA, Mahabadi N, D’Abarno A, Varacallo M. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 14, 2023. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Leg Lateral Compartment. [PubMed: 30137811]
29.Mostafa E, Graefe SB, Varacallo M. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): May 23, 2023. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Leg Posterior Compartment. [PMC free article: PMC537340] [PubMed: 30726025]
30.Lohrer H, Malliaropoulos N, Korakakis V, Padhiar N. Exercise-induced leg pain in athletes: diagnostic, assessment, and management strategies. Phys Sportsmed. 2019 Feb;47(1):47-59. [PubMed: 30345867]
31.Livingston KS, Meehan WP, Hresko MT, Matheney TH, Shore BJ. Acute Exertional Compartment Syndrome in Young Athletes: A Descriptive Case Series and Review of the Literature. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Feb;34(2):76-80. [PubMed: 27248777]
32.Boody AR, Wongworawat MD. Accuracy in the measurement of compartment pressures: a comparison of three commonly used devices. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Nov;87(11):2415-22. [PubMed: 16264116]
