Corneal Abrasion Differential Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Guide for Eye Care Professionals

Corneal abrasions are a very common ocular condition frequently encountered in emergency rooms and primary care settings. Characterized by disruption of the corneal epithelium, these injuries can cause significant patient discomfort, including pain, photophobia, and the sensation of a foreign body in the eye. Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial not only to alleviate patient symptoms but also to differentiate corneal abrasions from other, potentially more serious ocular conditions. This article provides an in-depth guide to the differential diagnosis of corneal abrasions, ensuring clinicians can confidently and effectively manage patients presenting with corneal injuries.

Understanding Corneal Abrasions

A corneal abrasion, simply put, is a scratch on the surface of the cornea. This outer layer, the epithelium, is rich in nerve endings, making even minor disruptions intensely painful. These abrasions typically result from non-penetrating trauma, and while often benign, they require careful evaluation to rule out other conditions that may present similarly.

Common Causes of Corneal Abrasions

Understanding the etiology of corneal abrasions is essential for both diagnosis and patient education. The causes are diverse, ranging from accidental trauma to contact lens misuse. Common culprits include:

• Traumatic Injury: This is the most frequent cause, often resulting from fingernails, tree branches, paper edges, makeup applicators, or workplace debris striking the eye.
• Foreign Bodies: Sand, dust, or other small particles can abrade the cornea, especially if the patient rubs their eyes.
• Contact Lenses: Improperly fitted, damaged, or overworn contact lenses, as well as insertion and removal issues, can lead to abrasions. Extended wear contact lenses, particularly overnight use, increases this risk.
• Spontaneous Corneal Erosions: These occur without apparent trauma and are often linked to underlying conditions that weaken the corneal epithelium, such as corneal dystrophies or dry eye syndrome.

Symptoms and Signs of Corneal Abrasion

Patients with corneal abrasions typically present with a constellation of symptoms that, while suggestive, are not exclusive to this condition. Recognizing these signs and symptoms is the first step in formulating a differential diagnosis:

Symptoms:

• Severe Eye Pain: Often described as sharp or burning.
• Foreign Body Sensation: The feeling that something is in the eye.
• Photophobia: Sensitivity to light.
• Excessive Tearing (Lacrimation): The eye’s natural response to irritation.
• Redness (Erythema): Inflammation of the conjunctiva.
• Blurred Vision: Particularly with central abrasions.
• Difficulty Opening the Eye: Due to pain and discomfort.

Signs (Observed during Examination):

• Fluorescein Staining: The hallmark sign of a corneal abrasion is a corneal defect that stains brightly green under cobalt blue light after fluorescein dye application.
• Conjunctival Injection: Redness of the conjunctiva.
• Corneal Edema: Swelling of the cornea, sometimes causing a hazy appearance.
• Ciliary Flush: Redness around the cornea, indicating deeper inflammation.
• Pupillary Miosis: Constriction of the pupil.

The Crucial Role of Differential Diagnosis

While corneal abrasions are common and generally self-limiting, it is vital to perform a thorough differential diagnosis to rule out other conditions that may mimic their presentation. Failure to consider alternative diagnoses can lead to delayed or inappropriate treatment, potentially resulting in vision-threatening complications.

The differential diagnosis for corneal abrasion is broad and includes various ocular surface diseases, anterior segment conditions, and even systemic illnesses with ocular manifestations. The key is to systematically consider and differentiate these conditions based on history, clinical examination, and, when necessary, further investigations.

Corneal Abrasion Differential Diagnosis: Key Considerations

The following conditions should be considered in the differential diagnosis of corneal abrasions:

1. Corneal Foreign Body

Distinguishing Features: Similar symptoms to corneal abrasion (pain, foreign body sensation, tearing, redness). However, history often reveals a specific incident involving flying debris or particles. Examination may reveal a visible foreign body on the cornea or conjunctiva, even after fluorescein staining highlights the abrasion caused by the foreign body.

Differentiation: Careful slit-lamp examination, particularly after everting the eyelids to check the superior fornix, is essential. Removal of the foreign body typically provides immediate symptom relief. Fluorescein staining will show both the abrasion and potentially a residual staining pattern from the foreign body track.

2. Conjunctivitis (Keratoconjunctivitis)

Distinguishing Features: Conjunctivitis, especially viral or bacterial, can present with redness, tearing, and foreign body sensation. Viral conjunctivitis often includes watery discharge, while bacterial conjunctivitis may have purulent discharge. Pain is usually less severe than in corneal abrasion, and photophobia is less prominent.

Differentiation: Conjunctivitis typically involves diffuse conjunctival injection, whereas corneal abrasion may have more localized redness around the limbus. Fluorescein staining in conjunctivitis is usually negative or shows only punctate epithelial erosions (PEE) that are less defined than a corneal abrasion. History of recent upper respiratory infection might suggest viral conjunctivitis.

3. Dry Eye Syndrome (Keratitis Sicca)

Distinguishing Features: Dry eye can cause chronic or intermittent discomfort, foreign body sensation, and mild redness. Symptoms are often worse in the morning or later in the day, and may be exacerbated by dry environments or prolonged screen use. While pain is usually less acute than in corneal abrasion, exacerbations can mimic abrasion symptoms.

Differentiation: Dry eye symptoms are typically bilateral and chronic, unlike the acute and often unilateral presentation of corneal abrasion. Fluorescein staining in dry eye may show diffuse PEE, but lacks the distinct, localized defect of an abrasion. Schirmer’s test and tear film breakup time (TBUT) can help assess tear film function and confirm dry eye.

4. Acute Angle-Closure Glaucoma

Distinguishing Features: This is a serious condition characterized by sudden onset of severe eye pain, blurred vision, halos around lights, nausea, and vomiting. Redness is present, and the cornea may appear hazy due to edema. Photophobia can be significant.

Differentiation: Acute angle-closure glaucoma presents with markedly elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), a fixed and mid-dilated pupil, and corneal edema causing a hazy cornea. Corneal abrasion, in contrast, does not typically affect pupil size or IOP and has a clear cornea outside the abrasion area. Gonioscopy is crucial to assess the anterior chamber angle in suspected cases of angle closure.

5. Uveitis (Anterior Uveitis/Iritis)

Distinguishing Features: Anterior uveitis can cause eye pain, redness (ciliary flush), photophobia, and blurred vision. It may also present with tearing and mild foreign body sensation.

Differentiation: Uveitis is characterized by cells and flare in the anterior chamber, which are not seen in uncomplicated corneal abrasion. Pupil may be miotic and irregular. Intraocular pressure can be normal, elevated, or low. Fluorescein staining will show corneal abrasion if present, but the underlying inflammation in the anterior chamber is the key differentiating factor. History of systemic inflammatory conditions or autoimmune diseases may raise suspicion for uveitis.

6. Infective Keratitis (Bacterial, Fungal, Herpetic)

Distinguishing Features: Infective keratitis, particularly bacterial keratitis, can mimic corneal abrasion in its early stages, presenting with pain, redness, photophobia, and blurred vision. Contact lens wear is a significant risk factor for bacterial keratitis. Herpetic keratitis may have less acute pain but can also cause significant corneal irritation.

Differentiation: Infective keratitis often presents with a corneal infiltrate (a white or yellowish opacity in the cornea), which is not seen in simple corneal abrasions. Bacterial keratitis typically progresses more rapidly and can be sight-threatening. Herpes simplex keratitis often has a dendritic ulcer pattern on fluorescein staining. History of contact lens wear, corneal trauma with organic material (for fungal keratitis), or previous herpes infection are important clues. Corneal scraping and culture may be necessary to confirm infectious keratitis.

7. Corneal Ulcer

Distinguishing Features: A corneal ulcer is a deeper corneal defect involving the stroma, often caused by infection but can also be non-infectious (e.g., neurotrophic keratitis). Symptoms are similar to corneal abrasion but often more severe and prolonged.

Differentiation: Corneal ulcers are typically larger and deeper than simple abrasions. Slit-lamp examination reveals stromal involvement, which is absent in superficial abrasions. Infectious ulcers usually have infiltrates. Neurotrophic ulcers may have reduced corneal sensation and are associated with conditions affecting corneal innervation (e.g., herpes zoster ophthalmicus, diabetes).

8. Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome (RCES)

Distinguishing Features: RCES involves spontaneous epithelial breakdown, often occurring upon awakening, causing sudden onset of sharp pain, foreign body sensation, and tearing. It frequently occurs in patients with a history of corneal abrasion or epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (EBMD).

Differentiation: RCES has a characteristic history of recurrent episodes, often triggered by minor eye movements upon waking. Fluorescein staining will reveal an epithelial defect, but the history of recurrence and lack of recent trauma points towards RCES. EBMD can be visualized on slit-lamp examination as map-dot-fingerprint changes on the cornea.

9. Neurotrophic Keratopathy

Distinguishing Features: This condition results from impaired corneal innervation, leading to epithelial breakdown and poor healing. Patients may have surprisingly little pain despite significant corneal damage due to reduced corneal sensation. Other symptoms include blurred vision and redness.

Differentiation: Reduced corneal sensation is the hallmark of neurotrophic keratopathy, which can be assessed using a wisp of cotton or a corneal esthesiometer. Conditions predisposing to neurotrophic keratopathy include herpes zoster ophthalmicus, diabetes, stroke, and prior corneal surgery. Fluorescein staining will show an epithelial defect, but the lack of pain and reduced sensation are key differentiators.

10. Chemical or UV Keratitis

Distinguishing Features: Chemical injuries (acid or alkali burns) and UV keratitis (e.g., welder’s flash, sunlamp exposure) cause diffuse corneal epithelial damage. Chemical burns present with a history of exposure and can range from mild irritation to severe tissue damage. UV keratitis typically occurs a few hours after exposure and causes intense pain, photophobia, and tearing.

Differentiation: History of chemical exposure or UV exposure is crucial. Chemical burns may involve conjunctival and scleral damage as well, and require immediate irrigation. UV keratitis is often bilateral and presents with diffuse, punctate fluorescein staining, unlike the localized defect of a traumatic abrasion.

11. Trichiasis

Distinguishing Features: Trichiasis is misdirection of eyelashes, causing them to rub against the cornea. This can lead to chronic corneal irritation, foreign body sensation, and sometimes pain and redness.

Differentiation: Careful examination reveals eyelashes rubbing on the cornea. Fluorescein staining may show linear or punctate epithelial defects in the area of lash contact. Epilation or more permanent eyelash removal methods are needed to manage trichiasis.

12. Postoperative Complications

Distinguishing Features: Following ocular surgery, particularly corneal surgery or refractive surgery, patients may develop epithelial defects or erosions.

Differentiation: Recent history of ocular surgery is key. Postoperative epithelial defects may be related to surgical trauma, dry eye, or infection. Careful assessment of the surgical site and consideration of postoperative healing phases are important.

13. Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD)

Distinguishing Features: LSCD involves damage to the limbal stem cells, which are crucial for corneal epithelial regeneration. It can result from chemical burns, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, contact lens overuse, or other insults. Symptoms include chronic redness, pain, photophobia, and blurred vision.

Differentiation: LSCD is characterized by conjunctivalization of the cornea (conjunctival tissue growing onto the cornea), corneal neovascularization, and persistent epithelial defects. Fluorescein staining may show irregular epithelial defects. History of predisposing conditions and clinical signs of limbal damage help in diagnosis.

Diagnostic Approach to Corneal Abrasion

A systematic approach is essential for accurate diagnosis and differentiation:

1. History: Obtain a detailed history of the injury, including mechanism, time of onset, contact lens wear, previous eye conditions, and systemic illnesses.
2. Visual Acuity: Assess visual acuity in both eyes. Reduced acuity may indicate a central abrasion or more significant pathology.
3. External Examination: Inspect for redness, discharge, and visible foreign bodies.
4. Pupillary Examination: Check pupil size, shape, and reactivity to light.
5. Slit-Lamp Examination: Perform a thorough slit-lamp examination, including:
   • Conjunctiva and Sclera: Evaluate for injection, chemosis.
   • Cornea: Assess for clarity, edema, infiltrates, ulcers, and epithelial defects before and after fluorescein staining. Look for dendritic lesions suggestive of herpes keratitis.
   • Anterior Chamber: Check for cells and flare, hypopyon, hyphema.
   • Eyelids: Evert eyelids to rule out foreign bodies in the superior fornix.
6. Fluorescein Staining: Apply fluorescein dye and examine under cobalt blue light to visualize epithelial defects. Note the size, shape, and location of the abrasion.
7. Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measurement: Measure IOP, especially if angle-closure glaucoma is suspected.
8. Corneal Sensation Testing: Consider testing corneal sensation in cases of suspected neurotrophic keratopathy or herpes keratitis.
9. Further Investigations: If infectious keratitis is suspected, corneal scraping for Gram stain and culture may be necessary. In cases of suspected dry eye, Schirmer’s test and TBUT can be performed. Gonioscopy is indicated if angle-closure glaucoma is a possibility.

Management and When to Refer

Uncomplicated corneal abrasions are typically managed conservatively with:

• Topical Antibiotic Ointment or Drops: To prevent secondary bacterial infection.
• Cycloplegic Agents: To relieve pain from ciliary spasm and photophobia.
• Pain Management: Oral analgesics (NSAIDs or acetaminophen) or topical NSAID drops for pain relief.
• Avoid Patching: Patching is generally not recommended for simple corneal abrasions.
• Follow-up: Daily follow-up is usually not necessary for small, uncomplicated abrasions that are improving.

Referral to an Ophthalmologist is warranted in the following situations:

• Large abrasions or abrasions affecting the visual axis.
• Suspected corneal ulcer or infective keratitis.
• Hypopyon or hyphema.
• Significant reduction in visual acuity.
• Abrasions not healing within 3-4 days.
• Contact lens-related corneal abrasions (due to increased risk of Pseudomonas infection).
• Recurrent corneal erosions.
• Any diagnostic uncertainty or concern for other underlying conditions.

Conclusion

Corneal abrasions are a common and often painful condition that requires prompt and accurate diagnosis. While typically benign, it is crucial to consider the broad differential diagnosis to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate management. By systematically evaluating patient history, clinical signs, and utilizing diagnostic tools like fluorescein staining and slit-lamp biomicroscopy, clinicians can confidently differentiate corneal abrasions from other ocular conditions and provide optimal care, leading to improved patient outcomes and preventing potential vision loss. Understanding the nuances of Corneal Abrasion Differential Diagnosis is paramount for all eye care professionals involved in emergency and primary eye care.

References

[List of references from original article – same references should be used]

1.Sliwicki AL, Orringer K. Corneal Abrasions. Pediatr Rev. 2023 Jun 01;44(6):343-345. [PubMed: 37258882]
2.Aalam W, Barry M, Alharbi M, Tamur S, Wazzan A, Edward DP. Diagnosis and Management of Corneal Abrasion Perception of (Primary Health Care Physicians and Emergency Physicians) and its Determinants in Saudi Arabia – A Survey. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul-Sep;28(3):151-158. [PMC free article: PMC8763100] [PubMed: 35125796]
3.Wipperman JL, Dorsch JN. Evaluation and management of corneal abrasions. Am Fam Physician. 2013 Jan 15;87(2):114-20. [PubMed: 23317075]
4.Ambikkumar A, Arthurs B, El-Hadad C. Corneal foreign bodies. CMAJ. 2022 Mar 21;194(11):E419. [PMC free article: PMC9053958] [PubMed: 35314442]
5.Lin YB, Gardiner MF. Fingernail-induced corneal abrasions: case series from an ophthalmology emergency department. Cornea. 2014 Jul;33(7):691-5. [PubMed: 24831196]
6.Lim CHL, Stapleton F, Mehta JS. Review of Contact Lens-Related Complications. Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 2:S1-S10. [PubMed: 29373389]
7.Hegarty DM, Hermes SM, Morgan MM, Aicher SA. Acute hyperalgesia and delayed dry eye after corneal abrasion injury. Pain Rep. 2018 Jul-Aug;3(4):e664. [PMC free article: PMC6085140] [PubMed: 30123857]
8.Ahmed F, House RJ, Feldman BH. Corneal Abrasions and Corneal Foreign Bodies. Prim Care. 2015 Sep;42(3):363-75. [PubMed: 26319343]
9.McGinley TC. Adult Eye Conditions: Common Eye Conditions. FP Essent. 2022 Aug;519:11-18. [PubMed: 35947131]
10.Ruffin M, Brochiero E. Repair Process Impairment by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Epithelial Tissues: Major Features and Potential Therapeutic Avenues. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:182. [PMC free article: PMC6554286] [PubMed: 31214514]
11.Miller DD, Hasan SA, Simmons NL, Stewart MW. Recurrent corneal erosion: a comprehensive review. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:325-335. [PMC free article: PMC6376883] [PubMed: 30809089]
12.Bourges JL. Corneal dystrophies. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Jun;40(6):e177-e192. [PubMed: 28583694]
13.Lai SC, Wang CW, Wu YM, Dai YX, Chen TJ, Wu HL, Cherng YG, Tai YH. Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated with Dry Eye Disease and Corneal Surface Damage: A Nationwide Matched Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 15;20(2) [PMC free article: PMC9861823] [PubMed: 36674338]
14.Watson SL, Leung V. Interventions for recurrent corneal erosions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 09;7(7):CD001861. [PMC free article: PMC6513638] [PubMed: 29985545]
15.Lin SR, Aldave AJ, Chodosh J. Recurrent corneal erosion syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;103(9):1204-1208. [PubMed: 30760455]
16.Shields T, Sloane PD. A comparison of eye problems in primary care and ophthalmology practices. Fam Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;23(7):544-6. [PubMed: 1936738]
17.McGwin G, Xie A, Owsley C. Rate of eye injury in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;123(7):970-6. [PubMed: 16009840]
18.Aslam SA, Sheth HG, Vaughan AJ. Emergency management of corneal injuries. Injury. 2007 May;38(5):594-7. [PubMed: 16949077]
19.McGwin G, Owsley C. Incidence of emergency department-treated eye injury in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 May;123(5):662-6. [PubMed: 15883286]
20.Jayamanne DG. Do patients presenting to accident and emergency departments with the sensation of a foreign body in the eye (gritty eye) have significant ocular disease? J Accid Emerg Med. 1995 Dec;12(4):286-7. [PMC free article: PMC1342583] [PubMed: 8775960]
21.Stapleton F, Keay L, Jalbert I, Cole N. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84(4):257-72. [PubMed: 17435509]
22.Schornack MM, Nau CB, Harthan J, Shorter E, Nau A, Fogt J. Survey-Based Estimation of Corneal Complications Associated with Scleral Lens Wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2023 Mar 01;49(3):89-91. [PMC free article: PMC9974798] [PubMed: 36602410]
23.Lee SY, Kim YH, Johnson D, Mondino BJ, Weissman BA. Contact lens complications in an urgent-care population: the University of California, Los Angeles, contact lens study. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Jan;38(1):49-52. [PubMed: 22157395]
24.Sridhar MS. Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;66(2):190-194. [PMC free article: PMC5819093] [PubMed: 29380756]
25.Feizi S, Jafarinasab MR, Karimian F, Hasanpour H, Masudi A. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement in normal and keratoconic eyes using three corneal pachymeters. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014 Jul-Sep;9(3):296-304. [PMC free article: PMC4307658] [PubMed: 25667728]
26.Ruan Y, Jiang S, Musayeva A, Pfeiffer N, Gericke A. Corneal Epithelial Stem Cells-Physiology, Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options. Cells. 2021 Sep 03;10(9) [PMC free article: PMC8465583] [PubMed: 34571952]
27.Rocha-de-Lossada C, Torras-Sanvicens J, Peraza-Nieves J. Corneal epithelial cells division assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;68(10):2252. [PMC free article: PMC7728030] [PubMed: 32971670]
28.Leong YY, Tong L. Barrier function in the ocular surface: from conventional paradigms to new opportunities. Ocul Surf. 2015 Apr;13(2):103-9. [PubMed: 25881994]
29.Altshuler A, Amitai-Lange A, Tarazi N, Dey S, Strinkovsky L, Hadad-Porat S, Bhattacharya S, Nasser W, Imeri J, Ben-David G, Abboud-Jarrous G, Tiosano B, Berkowitz E, Karin N, Savir Y, Shalom-Feuerstein R. Discrete limbal epithelial stem cell populations mediate corneal homeostasis and wound healing. Cell Stem Cell. 2021 Jul 01;28(7):1248-1261.e8. [PMC free article: PMC8254798] [PubMed: 33984282]
30.Tavakkoli F, Eleiwa TK, Elhusseiny AM, Damala M, Rai AK, Cheraqpour K, Ansari MH, Doroudian M, H Keshel S, Soleimani M, Djalilian AR, Sangwan VS, Singh V. Corneal stem cells niche and homeostasis impacts in regenerative medicine; concise review. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;33(4):1536-1552. [PubMed: 36604831]
31.Liu CY, Kao WW. Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;134:61-71. [PubMed: 26310149]
32.Wilson SE. Corneal wound healing. Exp Eye Res. 2020 Aug;197:108089. [PMC free article: PMC7483425] [PubMed: 32553485]
33.Liu J, Li Z. Resident Innate Immune Cells in the Cornea. Front Immunol. 2021;12:620284. [PMC free article: PMC7953153] [PubMed: 33717118]
34.Ljubimov AV, Saghizadeh M. Progress in corneal wound healing. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015 Nov;49:17-45. [PMC free article: PMC4651844] [PubMed: 26197361]
35.Thoft RA, Friend J. The X, Y, Z hypothesis of corneal epithelial maintenance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983 Oct;24(10):1442-3. [PubMed: 6618809]
36.Liu J, Xiao C, Wang H, Xue Y, Dong D, Lin C, Song F, Fu T, Wang Z, Chen J, Pan H, Li Y, Cai D, Li Z. Local Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells Promote Corneal Regeneration after Epithelial Abrasion. Am J Pathol. 2017 Jun;187(6):1313-1326. [PubMed: 28419818]
37.Yang L, Di G, Qi X, Qu M, Wang Y, Duan H, Danielson P, Xie L, Zhou Q. Substance P promotes diabetic corneal epithelial wound healing through molecular mechanisms mediated via the neurokinin-1 receptor. Diabetes. 2014 Dec;63(12):4262-74. [PubMed: 25008176]
38.Loureiro RR, Gomes JÁP. Biological modulation of corneal epithelial wound healing. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2019 Jan-Feb;82(1):78-84. [PubMed: 30652772]
39.Hakimi AA, Carter S, Garg S. Detecting corneal injury with a selfie. Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;29(11):1403-1404. [PubMed: 35921203]
40.Tripathy K. Documentation of corneal epithelial defects with a fluorescein angiographic imaging system. Clin Case Rep. 2019 Sep;7(9):1815-1816. [PMC free article: PMC6745441] [PubMed: 31534763]
41.Wilson G, Ren H, Laurent J. Corneal epithelial fluorescein staining. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995 Jul;66(7):435-41. [PubMed: 7560732]
42.Wilson SA, Last A. Management of corneal abrasions. Am Fam Physician. 2004 Jul 01;70(1):123-8. [PubMed: 15259527]
43.Jamali A, Hu K, Sendra VG, Blanco T, Lopez MJ, Ortiz G, Qazi Y, Zheng L, Turhan A, Harris DL, Hamrah P. Characterization of Resident Corneal Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells and Their Pivotal Role in Herpes Simplex Keratitis. Cell Rep. 2020 Sep 01;32(9):108099. [PMC free article: PMC7511260] [PubMed: 32877681]
44.Bhargava M, Bhambhani V, Paul RS. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography characteristics and management of a unique spectrum of foreign bodies in the cornea and anterior chamber. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4284-4292. [PMC free article: PMC9940523] [PubMed: 36453330]
45.Kaiser PK. A comparison of pressure patching versus no patching for corneal abrasions due to trauma or foreign body removal. Corneal Abrasion Patching Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1995 Dec;102(12):1936-42. [PubMed: 9098299]
46.Benson WH, Snyder IS, Granus V, Odom JV, Macsai MS. Tetanus prophylaxis following ocular injuries. J Emerg Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;11(6):677-83. [PubMed: 8157904]
47.Guier CP, Stokkermans TJ. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jul 19, 2023. Corneal Foreign Body Removal. [PubMed: 32119365]
48.Dang DH, Riaz KM, Karamichos D. Treatment of Non-Infectious Corneal Injury: Review of Diagnostic Agents, Therapeutic Medications, and Future Targets. Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(2):145-167. [PMC free article: PMC8843898] [PubMed: 35025078]
49.Clemons CS, Cohen EJ, Arentsen JJ, Donnenfeld ED, Laibson PR. Pseudomonas ulcers following patching of corneal abrasions associated with contact lens wear. CLAO J. 1987 May-Jun;13(3):161-4. [PubMed: 3329585]
50.Calder LA, Balasubramanian S, Fergusson D. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for corneal abrasions: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 May;12(5):467-73. [PubMed: 15860701]
51.Wakai A, Lawrenson JG, Lawrenson AL, Wang Y, Brown MD, Quirke M, Ghandour O, McCormick R, Walsh CD, Amayem A, Lang E, Harrison N. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in traumatic corneal abrasions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 18;5(5):CD009781. [PMC free article: PMC6481688] [PubMed: 28516471]
52.Al-Saleh GS, Alfawaz AM. Management of traumatic corneal abrasion by a sample of practicing ophthalmologists in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr-Jun;32(2):105-109. [PMC free article: PMC6010595] [PubMed: 29942177]
53.Ball IM, Seabrook J, Desai N, Allen L, Anderson S. Dilute proparacaine for the management of acute corneal injuries in the emergency department. CJEM. 2010 Sep;12(5):389-96. [PubMed: 20880433]
54.Saccomano SJ, Ferrara LR. Managing corneal abrasions in primary care. Nurse Pract. 2014 Sep 18;39(9):1-6. [PubMed: 25140844]
55.Jolly R, Arjunan M, Theodorou M, Dahlmann-Noor AH. Eye injuries in children – incidence and outcomes: An observational study at a dedicated children’s eye casualty. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;29(5):499-503. [PubMed: 30270661]
56.Tsai CC, Kau HC, Kao SC, Liu JH. A review of ocular emergencies in a Taiwanese medical center. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1998 Jul;61(7):414-20. [PubMed: 9699394]