Dee Dee Blanchard Mental Diagnosis: Examining Medical Child Abuse and Media Sensationalism

Stephanie Wrobel’s debut novel, Darling Rose Gold, while a compelling and fast-paced read, prompts a deeper examination into the complexities of medical child abuse, particularly in light of the infamous case of Dee Dee Blanchard and her daughter, Gypsy Rose. This novel, seemingly inspired by the Blanchards’ story, serves as a point of departure to discuss the serious issue of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIoA), previously known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy, and how cases like Dee Dee Blanchard’s are often sensationalized in media, potentially distorting public understanding of mental health and abuse.

The narrative of Dee Dee and Gypsy Rose Blanchard captivated and, for many, deceived the public. Initially perceived as a devoted mother caring for her chronically ill daughter, Dee Dee Blanchard’s image crumbled after her murder in 2015, orchestrated by Gypsy Rose and her online boyfriend. The revelation that Gypsy Rose was not, in fact, as sick as her mother portrayed, and was actually an adult, shocked many. The public’s sense of betrayal was palpable, especially considering the community support and benefits the Blanchards had received, including charity donations and even a house from Habitat for Humanity. This case, and fictionalized accounts like Darling Rose Gold, highlight the critical need to understand the potential mental health factors at play in such situations, specifically concerning Dee Dee Blanchard’s possible mental diagnosis and its implications for medical child abuse.

Understanding Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIoA)

To comprehend the potential motivations and actions of individuals like Dee Dee Blanchard, it is crucial to understand Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another. This condition, detailed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), involves a person deceptively presenting another individual – often a child – as sick, injured, or impaired. This can manifest in various ways, from fabricating symptoms and manipulating medical tests to actively inducing illness through poisoning or other harmful means. The core of FDIoA is the perpetrator’s need to assume the sick role by proxy, often driven by a complex interplay of psychological factors. While the DSM-5 provides diagnostic criteria for FDIoA, understanding the nuances of each case, especially retrospectively like Dee Dee Blanchard’s, remains challenging.

Dee Dee Blanchard and Gypsy Rose Blanchard in a publicly available image, reflecting the constructed image of a caring mother and sickly child, central to the deception in cases of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another.

The Role of Mothers in Medical Child Abuse

Tragically, in the vast majority of documented medical child abuse cases, mothers are identified as the perpetrators. Fathers, in contrast, tend to have a less significant role. This gender disparity is a recurring theme in discussions of FDIoA, though the reasons behind it are complex and not fully understood. Darling Rose Gold touches upon this dynamic, albeit briefly, through the character of Rose Gold’s estranged father. His dismissive and stereotypical comment about expected behavior from girls versus boys, after realizing Rose Gold’s manipulative tendencies, inadvertently highlights the societal biases and expectations that can further complicate the understanding and identification of maternal medical child abuse. This fictional interaction underscores the deeply ingrained societal views that can obscure the reality of mothers being capable of such harmful actions, contributing to the difficulty in recognizing and addressing cases like that of Dee Dee Blanchard.

Sensationalism vs. Reality: “Darling Rose Gold” and the Dee Dee Blanchard Case

The parallels between Darling Rose Gold and the Dee Dee Blanchard case are undeniable. Beyond the protagonist’s name, Rose Gold, which itself echoes Gypsy Rose, the novel incorporates elements that mirror the media’s portrayal of the Blanchard story. These include details like poor dental health and the presence of a secret online boyfriend, albeit with a fictional twist in the book. Moreover, the novel plays into the narrative of Rose Gold as manipulative and vengeful, aligning with some public perceptions of Gypsy Rose post-revelation. While fiction can explore complex themes, there’s a risk when it sensationalizes real-life tragedies, especially those involving mental health and abuse. Darling Rose Gold, by focusing on a revenge plot, potentially simplifies and sensationalizes the profound complexities of medical child abuse and the potential underlying mental health issues that might have been present in the Dee Dee Blanchard case.

The book cover of “Darling Rose Gold” by Stephanie Wrobel, a novel inspired by the Gypsy Rose Blanchard case, highlighting the fictionalized approach to a real-life tragedy involving potential Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another.

Contrasting Narratives: “Sickened” and the Victim’s Perspective

In stark contrast to the fictionalized sensationalism, Julie Gregory’s memoir, Sickened, provides a powerful and authentic account of surviving medical child abuse. Gregory recounts her personal journey of enduring years of abuse at the hands of her mother, detailing the long-lasting psychological and emotional scars. Her narrative moves beyond a simple revenge story, offering a nuanced exploration of the sequelae of medical child abuse and the arduous path to healing. Sickened emphasizes the victim’s experience, offering a perspective often overshadowed by media sensationalism focusing on the perpetrator. This memoir serves as a crucial counterpoint to fictionalized accounts, highlighting the real-life trauma and long-term impact on victims of medical child abuse, providing a more profound understanding of what individuals like Gypsy Rose might have endured.

The Importance of Forensic Psychiatry and Responsible Media Portrayal

For forensic psychiatrists, understanding both the sensationalized and the authentic narratives surrounding cases like Dee Dee Blanchard’s is paramount. Sensationalized portrayals, like Darling Rose Gold, can unfortunately shape public opinion and even influence potential jurors’ perceptions of complex cases involving mental health and abuse. It is crucial to be aware of how these fictionalized accounts can distort the public’s understanding of conditions like Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another and the realities of medical child abuse. Conversely, memoirs like Sickened offer invaluable insights into the lived experiences of victims, enriching the understanding of the long-term consequences of such abuse. Responsible media portrayal and informed fictional narratives are essential to fostering a more nuanced public understanding, moving beyond sensationalism to address the critical issues surrounding mental health, medical child abuse, and the complexities of cases like Dee Dee Blanchard’s.

References

  • Wrobel, S. (2020). Darling Rose Gold. New York: Berkley.
  • Gregory, J. (2003). Sickened: The Memoir of a Munchausen by Proxy Childhood. New York: Riverhead Books.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Asher, R. (1951). Munchausen’s syndrome. Lancet, 1(6650), 339-341.
  • Meadow, R. (1977). Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 52(1), 85-92.
  • Sheridan, M. S. (2003). Munchausen syndrome by proxy: identification and treatment. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 18(1), 22-32.
  • Remski, A. M., & Silverman, J. A. (2012). Medical child abuse: a systematic review of perpetrator, victim, and situational characteristics. Child abuse & neglect, 36(6), 413-421.
  • Feldman, M. D., & Brown, S. L. (2002). Munchausen by proxy syndrome: Misunderstood child abuse. Sage Publications.
  • Stirling, J., & Laskey, J. (2001). Long-term outcome in survivors of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Child Abuse Review, 10(3), 181-191.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *