Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) is a common condition that affects the lower back, and it’s frequently identified in medical diagnoses using specific codes. Among these, Diagnosis Code 72252 from the ICD-9 system is particularly relevant. This code specifically refers to intervertebral disc disorders affecting the lumbar intervertebral disc. Understanding what this diagnosis code entails is crucial for both medical professionals and individuals seeking to comprehend their back pain.
What is Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease?
Lumbar DDD encompasses a range of degenerative changes in the discs of the lower spine. These changes can be detected through imaging techniques like X-rays and are often associated with lumbar spondylosis and isolated disc resorption. Repetitive flexion and extension activities, such as those common in gymnastics and various sports, can contribute to the development of Lumbar DDD. Studies have shown a higher incidence of this condition in athletes, with up to 63% of Olympic gymnasts exhibiting signs of DDD.
Anatomy and Lumbar DDD
The lumbar spine is designed for both flexibility and support, relying heavily on the intervertebral discs. These discs act as cushions between the vertebrae, allowing for movement and absorbing shock. In Lumbar DDD, these discs undergo degeneration, which can involve:
- Disk-space narrowing: The space between vertebrae decreases as the disc loses height.
- End-plate sclerosis: The bone adjacent to the disc becomes harder and denser.
- Osteophyte formation: Bone spurs develop around the edges of the vertebrae.
- Facet hypertrophy: The facet joints, which guide spinal movement, enlarge.
- Spondylosis: General degeneration of the spine.
Image: Anatomical illustration of the lumbar spine highlighting the intervertebral discs, relevant to diagnosis code 72252 and Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
Clinical Evaluation and Symptoms
Patients with Lumbar DDD, indicated by diagnosis code 72252, typically present with specific symptoms during a clinical evaluation:
- Midline back pain: Pain centered in the lower back.
- Referred pain: Pain radiating to the sacroiliac joints and posterior thighs.
- Buttock/thigh pain with ambulation: Pain that worsens with walking.
- Painful lumbar ROM: Restricted and painful range of motion in the lumbar spine.
- Waddell’s signs: Non-organic signs that may indicate psychological factors contributing to pain.
Diagnosis and Diagnostic Tests
To diagnose Lumbar DDD and confirm diagnosis code 72252, several diagnostic tests are employed:
- X-rays (A/P, lateral, flexion/extension views): These images can reveal disk-space narrowing, end-plate sclerosis, osteophyte formation, facet hypertrophy, and spondylosis. They can also assess for segmental instability, defined as 4.5mm or 15 degrees of sagittal displacement on flexion/extension views.
Image: X-ray of a lumbar spine demonstrating degenerative disc disease, a condition associated with diagnosis code 72252.
- MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive and can show high-intensity zones on T2-weighted images, indicating annular tears. It also reveals loss of normal disc signal (dark discs) and Modic changes in the endplates and vertebral body.
- Diskography: Although less commonly used due to high false-negative rates, diskography can be employed. A positive result involves annular disruption, reproduction of the patient’s symptoms (concordant pain), and negative control levels. The Adams classification (Adams MA, JBJS 1986;68Br36) can categorize the changes observed.
Classification and Treatment Options
The treatment for Lumbar DDD, associated with diagnosis code 72252, ranges from conservative to surgical, depending on the severity of symptoms and the patient’s response to initial therapies.
-
Conservative Treatments:
- Activity limitations
- NSAIDs (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs)
- Physical therapy (Hayden JA, Ann Intern Med 2005;142:765)
- Muscle relaxants
- Narcotics (for short-term pain management)
- Progressive activity
-
Ineffective Treatments (No Benefit vs. Placebo):
- Electrical nerve stimulation
- Topical magnets
- Traction
- IDET (Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy) (Freeman BJ, Spine 2005;30:2369)
-
Surgical Options (for severe cases):
- ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion)
- PLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion)
- TLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion)
- Posterior fusion
- Total disc replacement
-
Epidural Corticosteroid Injections: These can provide temporary relief from radiculopathy associated with Lumbar DDD, reducing pain and improving function. However, benefits are often small and not sustained, and they do not affect long-term surgery risk (Chou R, Ann Intern Med. online 25 August 2015 doi:10.7326/M15-0934).
Associated Conditions and Differential Diagnosis
When considering diagnosis code 72252, it’s important to differentiate Lumbar DDD from other conditions that may present with similar symptoms:
- Cauda Equina Syndrome: A serious condition requiring immediate medical attention.
- Herniated disc: Protrusion of the disc material, which can also cause back and leg pain.
- Lumbar spinal stenosis: Narrowing of the spinal canal, compressing nerves.
Complications and Follow-up Care
While Lumbar DDD itself is not life-threatening, it can lead to chronic pain and disability. Follow-up care is essential to manage symptoms and monitor the progression of the condition. Studies indicate that spinal fusion for segmental instability in Lumbar DDD shows a 91% acceptable outcome, whereas discogenic pain confirmed by diskography has a 43% acceptable outcome following spinal fusion (Carragee EJ, Spine 2006;31:2115).
Understanding diagnosis code 72252 and Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease is vital for effective diagnosis and management of lower back pain. This comprehensive overview provides essential information on the condition, its diagnosis, and available treatment options.
Review References
- Adams MA, JBJS 1986;68Br36.
- Carragee EJ, Spine 2006;31:2115.
- Chou R, Ann Intern Med. online 25 August 2015 doi:10.7326/M15-0934
- Freeman BJ, Spine 2005;30:2369.
- Hayden JA, Ann Intern Med 2005;142:765.
