INTRODUCTION
Bone sclerosis, characterized by an abnormal increase in bone density and hardening, is a common finding in radiographic examinations. Identifying the cause of sclerotic bone lesions from radiographs can be diagnostically challenging. A systematic approach is crucial for radiologists to effectively differentiate these lesions based on imaging characteristics. This article provides a structured framework for differential diagnosis, categorizing lesions by number, extent (focal, multifocal, or diffuse), and nature (tumorous vs. non-tumorous) (Fig. 1). For focal lesions, we further refine the classification by location (intramedullary, cortical, or juxtacortical) and homogeneity (homogeneous or heterogeneous). This guide aims to systematically describe and illustrate key radiographic clues for the differential diagnosis of sclerotic bone lesions, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.
Fig. 1 Diagnostic Algorithm for Sclerotic Bone Lesions. This flowchart outlines a systematic approach to classify and differentiate sclerotic bone lesions based on radiographic findings, considering lesion number, extent, homogeneity, location, and tumorous vs. non-tumorous conditions. Note.-BPOP = Bizzare periosteal osteochondral proliferation, FD = fibrous dysplasia, He = heterogeneous, Ho = homogeneous, LSMF = Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor, N = non-tumorous condition, OM = osteomyelitis, OSA = osteosarcoma, POEMS = polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, and skin changes, SAPHO = synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis, T = tumorous condition
STEP-BY-STEP RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
Lesion Number and Pattern: Focal, Multifocal, or Diffuse
The initial step in evaluating sclerotic bone lesions is to determine the number and extent of the lesions. We categorize lesions into focal (solitary), multifocal, or diffuse. Multifocal lesions (Figs. 2, 3, 4) are characterized by multiple, distinct lesions with relatively well-defined borders. In contrast, diffuse lesions (Fig. 5) are extensive, often with indistinct borders, affecting a large area or multiple anatomical sites. This distinction is crucial as it narrows down the differential diagnosis.
Fig. 2 Spinal Sarcoidosis: Multifocal Osteoblastic Lesions. Axial CT image of the abdomen reveals multiple osteoblastic nodules within the vertebral body, indicative of multifocal involvement in sarcoidosis.
Fig. 3 POEMS Syndrome: Punctate Osteoblastic Lesions in the Spine. Coronal CT reconstruction of the spine demonstrates multiple punctate osteoblastic lesions, a characteristic finding in POEMS syndrome. Note.-POEMS = polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, and skin changes
Fig. 4 Systemic Mastocytosis: Multifocal Pelvic Bone Lesions. CT scan of the pelvis showing multiple osteoblastic lesions affecting the iliac and sacral bones, consistent with systemic mastocytosis.
Fig. 5 Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Diffuse Sclerotic Bone Lesions. Plain radiograph illustrating diffuse, ill-defined sclerotic lesions throughout the spine, pelvic bones, and both femurs, typical of osteoblastic metastasis from prostate cancer.
Lesion Location: Intramedullary, Cortical, or Juxtacortical
For focal sclerotic lesions, determining the location within the bone is the next critical step. Lesions can be intramedullary (within the bone marrow), cortical (within the bone cortex), or juxtacortical (adjacent to the cortex). The location often provides vital diagnostic clues, guiding the differential diagnosis towards specific entities [1]. For example, cortical lesions may suggest different pathologies compared to intramedullary lesions.
Degree of Homogeneity: Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Sclerosis
Evaluating the degree of homogeneity of the sclerotic density is the subsequent step. Homogeneous sclerosis implies a uniform density throughout the lesion, while heterogeneous sclerosis indicates a mixed pattern with varying densities, often reflecting a combination of osteoblastic and osteolytic components (Fig. 7). It’s important to note that lesions primarily characterized by osteolysis with minimal sclerosis, such as enchondromas with punctate mineralization, are generally excluded from this discussion, which focuses on sclerotic lesions. However, in conditions like osteochondroma, the sclerotic component arising from endochondral mineralization is considered [1]. Fibrous dysplasia (Fig. 6A, B) exhibits variable radiographic density depending on the degree of mineralization and the proportion of woven bone present [2].
Fig. 7 Liposclerosing Myxofibrous Tumor (LSMFT) of the Femur: Heterogeneous Sclerotic Lesion. A. Plain radiograph showing an ill-defined, mixed sclerotic and lytic lesion with a geographic pattern (arrows) in the intramedullary region of the right femoral neck. B. Coronal T1-weighted MRI demonstrating a heterogeneous lesion with dark (sclerotic, arrowheads), low (myxoid, asterisk) and focal high (fat, arrow) signal intensities, corresponding to the components of LSMFT.
Fig. 6 Fibrous Dysplasia: Variable Radiographic Appearance. A, B. Polyostotic fibrous dysplasia involving pelvic bones. Plain radiograph (A) and axial CT scan (B) reveal a characteristic ground-glass appearance with bony expansion affecting both ilia, left pubis, and ischium. C. Cortical fibrous dysplasia of the tibia. Plain radiograph of the lower leg demonstrating an ill-defined, intracortically sclerotic lesion (arrows) in the tibial diaphysis.
Tumorous vs. Non-Tumorous Lesions: Benign or Malignant?
While radiographic features alone may not definitively distinguish between tumorous and non-tumorous conditions, they offer valuable insights into the lesion’s aggressiveness and growth rate. This information, combined with patient demographics and lesion location, often allows for a reasonable diagnostic formulation [1]. Furthermore, tumorous lesions are broadly classified as benign or malignant, each with its own differential considerations.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DIAGNOSIS
Metastasis is the most prevalent malignant bone tumor and should always be a primary consideration in the differential diagnosis of sclerotic bone lesions. Even a solitary, well-defined sclerotic lesion in a patient with a known malignancy should raise suspicion for metastasis (Fig. 8). Clinical history of cancer significantly elevates the probability of metastatic disease, regardless of lesion morphology or number.
Fig. 8 Solitary Osteoblastic Metastasis from Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma. Plain radiograph showing an eccentrically located, densely sclerotic lesion (arrows) in the proximal tibia. Despite being solitary, metastasis was considered due to the patient’s history of lung cancer.
Homogeneously sclerotic lesions are less common than heterogeneous ones. Recognizing homogeneously sclerotic bone lesions is diagnostically useful, and includes entities like enostosis (bone island) (Fig. 9), osteoma (Fig.10), and bone callus or grafts. Enostosis appears radiographically as a circular or oblong area of dense bone with irregular, spiculated margins described as “thorny margins” or “brush borders” (Fig. 9) [3]. Osteomas present as very dense, ivory-like sclerotic masses with sharp borders, arising from the external cortical bone surface (Fig. 10) [3].
Fig. 9 Enostosis (Bone Island) of the Humeral Head. Plain radiograph showing a homogeneously sclerotic lesion with irregular, spiculated margins (arrows) in the humeral head, characteristic of enostosis.
Fig. 10 Osteoma of the Occipital Bone. Axial CT scan showing a sharply defined, dense, ivory-like sclerotic mass (arrows) with an exophytic growth pattern abutting the occipital cortex, consistent with osteoma.
Characteristic imaging findings are highly valuable for differential diagnosis, allowing for straightforward diagnosis in some cases based on radiographs or CT alone. These distinctive lesions include melorheostosis (Fig. 11), osteopetrosis (Fig. 12), osteochondroma (Fig. 13), osteoid osteoma (Fig. 14A), fibrous dysplasia (Fig. 6A, B), osteopoikilosis, osteitis condensans ilii (Fig. 15), callus, osteophyte, osteonecrosis (Fig. 16), and heterotopic ossification. Melorheostosis exhibits periosteal or endosteal cortical hyperostosis in a flowing pattern along one or multiple bones [4]. Osteopetrosis is marked by increased bone density, loss of corticomedullary differentiation, and sometimes a “bone-in-bone” appearance. Osteochondroma is pathognomically defined by cortical and medullary continuity between the lesion and the parent bone on radiographs [4]. Osteoid osteoma typically shows a cortical lucent nidus surrounded by reactive sclerosis, potentially obscuring the nidus due to significant cortical thickening. Central nidus calcification within fusiform osteosclerosis of a long bone diaphysis is also characteristic [3, 4]. Fibrous dysplasia (Fig. 6A, B) presents with a “ground-glass” appearance due to immature woven bone spicules, often with sclerotic borders and endosteal scalloping [2]. Osteitis condensans ilii (Fig. 15) involves bilateral (or unilateral) sclerosis in the subchondral marrow adjacent to the sacroiliac joints and/or pubic symphysis, frequently in women, especially postpartum [1]. Osteonecrosis in long bone metaphyses and diaphyses can demonstrate irregular peripheral sclerosis in the marrow during later stages (Fig. 16) [1]. Familiarity with these characteristic lesions is crucial for differentiating non-specific sclerotic lesions.
Fig. 11 Melorheostosis of Foot Bones. Plain radiograph of the foot demonstrating flowing cortical and endosteal hyperostosis (arrows) along the third metatarsal and lateral cuneiform bones, characteristic of melorheostosis.
Fig. 12 Osteopetrosis of the Skeleton. Plain radiograph showing diffusely sclerotic bones throughout the skeleton with a lack of differentiation between the cortex and medullary cavity, indicative of osteopetrosis.
Fig. 13 Osteochondroma of the Femur. Plain radiograph showing a sclerotic, bony outgrowth (arrows) with cortical and medullary continuity with the lesser trochanter of the femur, diagnostic of osteochondroma.
Fig. 14 Osteoid Osteoma: Classic Radiographic Appearance. A. Osteoid osteoma of the humerus. Plain radiograph showing a dense sclerotic focus with a thin radiolucent rim (arrows) representing the nidus, surrounded by cortical thickening. B, C. Osteoid osteoma of the femur. Plain radiograph (B) showing circumferential cortical thickening (arrows) in the proximal diaphysis of the femur. Corresponding axial CT scan (C) revealing a tiny, hypodense nidus (arrow) within the posterior cortex.
Fig. 15 Osteitis Condensans Ilii of the Sacroiliac Joint. Plain radiograph of the pelvis showing sclerosis of the iliac portion of the sacroiliac joint, with the joint space remaining intact, consistent with osteitis condensans ilii.
Fig. 16 Osteonecrosis of the Femur. Plain radiograph revealing irregular intramedullary sclerosis (arrows) in the distal femur, seen in the later stages of osteonecrosis.
Differential Diagnosis of Focal Sclerotic Lesions
When considering focally sclerotic lesions, especially those that are heterogeneously sclerotic and cortically located, ossifying fibroma (osteofibrous dysplasia) (Fig. 17), fibrous dysplasia (Fig. 6C), and adamantinoma (Fig. 18) should be included in the differential. Ossifying fibroma typically occurs in the diaphysis, particularly the middle to distal third of the tibial shaft, often involving the anterior cortex [4], and is most common in the first two decades of life [4]. It can cause bowing and enlargement of the bone, resembling intracortical osteolysis, frequently with an adjacent sclerotic band. While fibrous dysplasia of long bones is usually intramedullary and diaphyseal, cortical and eccentric lesions can occur [4]. Adamantinoma typically affects patients aged 20-50 years, predominantly in the tibia, specifically the anterior cortex and middle third of the diaphysis [4]. It is known for being locally aggressive.
Fig. 17 Ossifying Fibroma of the Fibula. Plain radiograph of the lower leg showing a large, ill-defined sclerotic lesion with marked cortical expansion (arrows) in the fibular diaphysis, characteristic of ossifying fibroma.
Fig. 18 Adamantinoma of the Tibia. Lateral plain radiograph of the lower leg showing an irregular sclerotic lesion (arrows) within the anterior cortex of the tibial diaphysis, consistent with adamantinoma.
Osteosarcoma, which can present with heterogeneous or homogeneous sclerotic components representing osteoblastic matrix, can occur in any location (Fig. 19). The patient’s age and specific radiographic features can aid in diagnosing osteosarcoma. Differentiating osteoid matrix (amorphous, cloud-like calcifications) from cartilage matrix (well-defined, punctate opacities often forming circles or rings) can be crucial. Approximately 90% of osteosarcomas show fluffy, cloud-like opacities on radiographs, indicative of osteoid matrix production [5].
Fig. 19 Osteosarcoma: Intramedullary and Parosteal Types. A. Plain radiograph revealing an ill-defined sclerotic lesion with aggressive periosteal reaction in the distal metadiaphysis of the femur, indicative of intramedullary osteosarcoma. B. Parosteal osteosarcoma of the distal femur. Plain radiograph of the knee showing an ossified exophytic tumor (arrows) on the surface of the femur with osteolytic intramedullary extension (arrowheads).
When focal cortical or juxtacortical thickening is the primary radiographic finding, the differential should include periosteal reaction from osteoid osteoma (Fig. 14B, C), healing or healed fractures (including stress fractures), lymphoma (Fig. 20), sclerosing osteomyelitis of Garre, and Ewing sarcoma. Considering the nature of periosteal reaction (benign vs. aggressive) and lesion margins further aids in differentiating benign from malignant conditions. Stress fractures typically present with smooth cortical and endosteal thickening, sometimes with associated lucent foci [4].
Fig. 20 Hodgkin’s Lymphoma of the Femur: Cortical Thickening. A. Plain radiograph of the femur showing diffuse cortical thickening. B. Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI showing diffuse marrow signal changes of high signal intensity throughout the head, neck, and diaphysis of the right femur.
Differential Diagnosis of Multifocal Sclerotic Lesions
Multifocally sclerotic lesions, while non-specific in isolation, are seen in various conditions including osteopoikilosis, sarcoidosis (Fig. 2), POEMS syndrome (Fig. 3), mastocytosis (Fig. 4), and tuberous sclerosis. Osteopoikilosis is characterized by numerous bone islands symmetrically distributed, particularly near articular bone ends. Radiographs are usually sufficient for diagnosis, but radionuclide scans can be used in equivocal cases. Notably, bone scans in osteopoikilosis are typically normal, unlike in metastatic disease [3]. POEMS syndrome frequently involves bone lesions, with sclerotic lesions being common. Focal osseous lesions in POEMS syndrome appear as well-defined or fluffy sclerotic lesions, or lytic lesions with peripheral sclerosis. Tuberous sclerosis and mastocytosis often exhibit osteoblastic deposits predominantly in the spine and innominate bones. Skeletal lesions are found in a significant proportion of systemic mastocytosis cases. The sclerotic foci in mastocytosis correspond to areas of fibrosis and osteoid formation [7].
SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) should also be considered, particularly when the sternoclavicular joint is involved, which is a hallmark feature (Fig. 21) [8]. While these conditions are relatively rare, considering systemic involvement and laboratory findings can aid in diagnosis.
Fig. 21 SAPHO Syndrome: Sternoclavicular Joint Involvement. A. Plain radiograph showing osteosclerosis and hypertrophy (arrows) in the medial portion of the clavicle, characteristic of SAPHO syndrome. B. Whole-body bone scan showing increased uptake in the sternoclavicular regions (white arrows), further supporting the diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome. Note.-SAPHO = synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis
Differential Diagnosis of Diffuse Sclerotic Lesions
Diffuse sclerotic lesions are more commonly associated with non-tumorous conditions. The differential diagnosis includes metabolic disorders such as hyperthyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, renal osteodystrophy, fluorosis, myelofibrosis, mastocytosis, Hodgkin’s lymphoma (Fig. 20), osteopetrosis (Fig. 12), osteoblastic metastases (Fig. 5), and Paget’s disease (9). In the mixed phase of Paget’s disease (Fig. 22), characteristic radiographic findings include coarsening and thickening of trabeculae and cortex. The blastic phase of Paget’s disease can lead to extensive sclerosis obliterating previous trabecular thickening [10]. Paget’s disease of the vertebral body typically shows osteoblastic activity along all four cortices, unlike the “rugger jersey spine” of renal osteodystrophy, which affects only the superior and inferior endplates [10]. Distinguishing Paget’s disease from hemangiomas can be challenging due to overlapping vertical trabecular thickening patterns, although Paget’s pattern is coarser [10]. Fluorosis often presents as dense diffuse osteosclerosis with osteophytes, especially affecting the spine, thorax, and pelvis [1].
Fig. 22 Paget’s Disease of the Pelvis: Mixed Phase. Anteroposterior plain radiograph showing extensive involvement of the pelvis with cortical (iliopectineal, ilioischial lines, and cortex of the right femur, arrows) and trabecular (arrowheads) thickening throughout. Coxa varus deformity is also noted in the right hip.
CONCLUSION
Sclerotic bone lesions exhibit a wide spectrum of radiographic morphologies, ranging from pathognomonic to non-specific, representing diverse disease entities. This systematic approach, emphasizing lesion number, extent, location, homogeneity, and tumorous nature, combined with familiarity with the imaging features of various sclerotic bone lesions, provides a robust framework for simplifying the differential diagnosis and improving diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.
References
[1] Resnick D. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1995.
[2] Greenspan A, Jundt G, Remagen W, Rölsdort G, Woodward AH. Fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia: imaging study of 27 cases. Radiology. 1986;159(3):699-707.
[3] Greenspan A. Orthopedic radiology: a practical approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
[4] Mirra JM. Bone tumors: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic correlation. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1989.
[5] McLeod RA, Dahlin DC, Beabout JW. The spectrum of osteosarcoma. Semin Roentgenol. 1976;11(3):149-64.
[6] Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, et al. POEMS syndrome: definition and long-term outcome. Blood. 2004;103(7):2496-506.
[7] Roberts ME, চিত্রণন DD, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Hartman TE, Vargas-Hitos F, Wittmann BJ. Mastocytosis revisited: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23(6):1641-64.
[8] Kahn MF, Khan MA. The SAPHO syndrome. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1994;8(3):703-22.
[9] Smith SE, Murphey MD, Motamedi K, Mulligan ME, Chew FS. From the archives of the AFIP: radiologic spectrum of Paget disease of bone and its complications with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002;22(5):1191-216.
[10] Resnick D, Kransdorf MJ. Bone and joint imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 2005.
