Differential Diagnosis for Molluscum Contagiosum: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Introduction

Molluscum contagiosum (MC), commonly known as water warts, is a benign viral skin infection characterized by distinctive, dome-shaped lesions. While often self-limiting, MC can present diagnostic challenges due to its varied clinical appearances and overlap with other dermatological conditions. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to differentiate MC from lesions requiring different management strategies, prevent unnecessary treatments, and alleviate patient anxiety. This article provides an in-depth guide to the differential diagnosis of molluscum contagiosum, ensuring clinicians can confidently distinguish it from mimicking conditions.

Etiology of Molluscum Contagiosum

Molluscum contagiosum is caused by the molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV), a double-stranded DNA poxvirus. MCV primarily infects keratinocytes, the main cell type in the epidermis, leading to the characteristic skin lesions. The most common subtype is MCV-1, particularly prevalent in children, while MCV-2 is more frequently observed in adults, especially those with HIV. Transmission occurs through direct skin-to-skin contact, including sexual contact, and indirectly via fomites like towels, toys, and shared personal items. Autoinoculation, the spread of the virus to other parts of the body by scratching, is also common.

Epidemiology of Molluscum Contagiosum

Molluscum contagiosum is a globally prevalent condition, affecting millions worldwide. It is particularly common in children aged 2 to 5 years, sexually active adults, and individuals with compromised immune systems. Warm, humid climates and conditions that disrupt the skin barrier, such as atopic dermatitis, can increase susceptibility. In individuals with HIV, the prevalence of MC can be significantly higher, reaching up to 18%.

Pathophysiology of Molluscum Contagiosum

The incubation period for MCV ranges from two weeks to six months. The virus evades the host’s immune response by producing proteins that inhibit antiviral immunity, allowing the infection to persist. MCV infection is limited to the epidermis, and the lesions are not associated with systemic involvement.

Clinical Presentation of Molluscum Contagiosum

Typical molluscum contagiosum lesions are described as:

• Appearance: Dome-shaped, round, pearly or flesh-colored papules.
• Size: Usually range from 1 to 5 millimeters, but can be larger in immunocompromised individuals.
• Umbilication: Characteristically have a central, umbilicated (dimpled) core, which may contain a whitish, cheesy material.
• Number: Can be solitary or multiple, often clustered together. In healthy individuals, typically fewer than 30 lesions are present. Immunocompromised patients can have numerous widespread lesions.
• Location: In children, lesions commonly appear on the face, trunk, limbs, and axillae. In adults, especially with sexually transmitted MC, lesions are frequently found in the anogenital area, abdomen, and inner thighs. Palms and soles are usually spared.
• Symptoms: Lesions are typically asymptomatic but may become itchy, inflamed, or tender, especially when resolving or secondarily infected.

Image: Classic presentation of Molluscum Contagiosum lesions showing dome-shaped, pearly papules with central umbilication.

Differential Diagnosis of Molluscum Contagiosum

Due to the variability in appearance, molluscum contagiosum can be mistaken for several other skin conditions. A thorough differential diagnosis is essential for accurate management. Key conditions to consider include:

1. Verruca Vulgaris (Common Warts)

• Differentiation: Warts are typically rough, cauliflower-like papules or nodules, lacking the smooth, dome-shaped appearance and central umbilication of MC. Warts often have black dots (thrombosed capillaries) visible on the surface when shaved.
• Diagnostic Clues for Warts: Rough surface, absence of umbilication, black dots, often occur on hands and feet, may be painful.

2. Verruca Plana (Flat Warts)

• Differentiation: Flat warts are small, smooth, flat-topped papules, often skin-colored or slightly brown. They lack the dome shape and umbilication of MC. Flat warts are commonly found on the face, forehead, and dorsum of hands.
• Diagnostic Clues for Flat Warts: Flat surface, lack of umbilication, often multiple and grouped, common on face and hands.

3. Condyloma Acuminatum (Genital Warts)

• Differentiation: Genital warts are also caused by HPV and can be cauliflower-like, filiform (thread-like), or flat. While some may resemble MC, they typically lack the distinct umbilication and pearly appearance. Genital warts are often found in the genital and perianal areas.
• Diagnostic Clues for Genital Warts: Location in genital area, varied morphology (cauliflower-like, filiform, flat), absence of typical MC umbilication, often sexually transmitted.

4. Epidermal Cysts (Inclusion Cysts or Sebaceous Cysts)

• Differentiation: Epidermal cysts are subcutaneous nodules, often firm and mobile, with a central punctum (pore). They lack the pearly appearance and umbilication of MC and are located deeper in the skin. Sometimes, cysts can become inflamed or rupture.
• Diagnostic Clues for Epidermal Cysts: Subcutaneous, deeper location, presence of a punctum, lack of umbilication, may contain cheesy or foul-smelling material if ruptured.

5. Folliculitis

• Differentiation: Folliculitis is an inflammation of hair follicles, presenting as small, erythematous papules or pustules centered around hair follicles. Unlike MC, folliculitis lesions are often itchy or painful and may contain pus.
• Diagnostic Clues for Folliculitis: Erythematous base, pustules, hair follicle-centered, itchy or painful, lack of umbilication.

6. Keratoacanthoma

• Differentiation: Keratoacanthomas are rapidly growing, dome-shaped nodules with a central keratin plug, which can resemble the umbilication of MC. However, keratoacanthomas are typically larger, develop quickly over weeks, and are more common in older individuals and sun-exposed areas. They are considered benign but have malignant potential and require careful monitoring and often biopsy.
• Diagnostic Clues for Keratoacanthoma: Rapid growth, larger size, keratin plug (more prominent than MC umbilication), older patients, sun-exposed areas, requires biopsy for definitive diagnosis.

7. Basal Cell Carcinoma (Nodular Type)

• Differentiation: Nodular basal cell carcinoma can sometimes mimic MC, presenting as a pearly papule. However, BCC often has telangiectasias (small blood vessels) on the surface and may have a rolled border. BCC is slow-growing and more common in older adults in sun-exposed areas. Any suspicious lesion, especially in adults, should be biopsied to rule out skin cancer.
• Diagnostic Clues for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Telangiectasias, rolled border, slow growth, older patients, sun-exposed areas, biopsy required for definitive diagnosis.

8. Lichen Planus (Papular Lichen Planus)

• Differentiation: Papular lichen planus presents with small, violaceous (purple), polygonal, flat-topped papules. Lichen planus lesions are typically itchy and may be associated with other characteristic features of lichen planus, such as Wickham’s striae (fine white lines on the surface) and mucosal involvement. MC lesions are not violaceous or polygonal.
• Diagnostic Clues for Lichen Planus: Violaceous color, polygonal shape, flat-topped, itchy, Wickham’s striae, potential mucosal involvement.

9. Pyoderma

• Differentiation: Pyoderma, particularly impetigo, can present with vesicles, bullae, or pustules that may rupture and form crusted lesions. While less likely to be confused with typical MC, crusted lesions could be considered in the differential. Impetigo is usually more inflamed and may have a honey-colored crust.
• Diagnostic Clues for Pyoderma (Impetigo): Vesicles, bullae, pustules, honey-colored crust, bacterial infection, more inflamed appearance.

10. Syringoma

• Differentiation: Syringomas are benign tumors of eccrine sweat ducts, presenting as small, flesh-colored or yellowish papules, often around the eyes. They are typically smaller and more numerous than MC and lack umbilication.
• Diagnostic Clues for Syringoma: Small, flesh-colored to yellowish, periocular location, lack of umbilication, often multiple.

11. Closed Comedones (Whiteheads)

• Differentiation: Closed comedones are small, white or flesh-colored papules caused by blocked hair follicles. They are common in acne and lack the pearly appearance and distinct umbilication of MC. Comedones are usually smaller and more superficial.
• Diagnostic Clues for Closed Comedones: Associated with acne, smaller size, lack of umbilication, superficial appearance, often on face and chest.

12. Fungal Infections (Cutaneous Cryptococcosis, Histoplasmosis, Sporotrichosis)

• Differentiation: In immunocompromised individuals, disseminated fungal infections like cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, and sporotrichosis can present with skin lesions that may mimic MC. However, these fungal lesions are often more varied in appearance, may be ulcerated or crusted, and are associated with systemic symptoms in severe cases. A skin biopsy with special stains and cultures is essential for diagnosis in suspected cases, especially in immunocompromised patients.
• Diagnostic Clues for Fungal Infections: Immunocompromised status, varied lesion morphology, ulceration, crusting, systemic symptoms, biopsy and cultures needed for diagnosis.

13. Varicella-Zoster Virus (Chickenpox and Shingles – Early Vesicular Stage)

• Differentiation: In the very early vesicular stage, before vesicles fully develop, chickenpox lesions might be initially confused with MC due to their papular nature. However, varicella lesions rapidly progress to vesicles and pustules, are intensely itchy, and typically appear in crops. Shingles follows a dermatomal distribution and is usually painful.
• Diagnostic Clues for Varicella-Zoster: Rapid progression to vesicles, intense itching, crops of lesions (chickenpox), dermatomal distribution and pain (shingles), history of chickenpox or shingles.

Image: Pseudo-Koebnerization in Flat Warts (A) and Molluscum Contagiosum (B). Note the different morphologies and presentations.

Diagnostic Tools

While clinical examination is usually sufficient for diagnosing molluscum contagiosum, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, and histopathology can be helpful in atypical cases or when the diagnosis is uncertain.

• Dermoscopy: Reveals a central white to yellow amorphous area with peripheral linear or branched vessels in MC lesions.
• Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: Shows a well-defined central area with septa separating hypo-refractive roundish lobules.
• Histopathology: Confirms the diagnosis by demonstrating the characteristic Henderson-Paterson bodies (large eosinophilic inclusions containing viral particles) within enlarged keratinocytes in the epidermis.

Management of Molluscum Contagiosum

Management strategies for molluscum contagiosum vary depending on patient preference, age, location, and extent of lesions. Options include:

• Observation: Spontaneous resolution is common within months to years, particularly in healthy individuals.
• Physical Removal: Cryotherapy, curettage, and laser therapy can be used to remove lesions but may be painful and cause scarring.
• Topical Medications: Topical treatments such as podophyllotoxin, potassium hydroxide, salicylic acid, benzoyl peroxide, tretinoin, imiquimod, and cantharidin are available to induce an inflammatory response and accelerate lesion clearance.

Conclusion

Accurate differential diagnosis is paramount in the management of molluscum contagiosum. While often clinically distinctive, MC can mimic various skin conditions, necessitating careful evaluation and consideration of alternative diagnoses. By understanding the key differentiating features of MC and its mimics, clinicians can ensure accurate diagnosis, appropriate management, and optimal patient care. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, or histopathology can be valuable adjuncts. Patient education regarding the benign and often self-limiting nature of molluscum contagiosum, as well as transmission prevention, remains a critical component of management.

References

1. Müller CSL, Laue M, Kremer K, Becker S, Vogt T, Smola S. Molluscum-contagiosum-Virus in einer Epidermalzyste. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2018 Sep;16(9):1144-1146. PubMed: 30179331
2. Nyati A, Gupta S, Jain SK, Yadav D, Patidar BL, Sharma M. A retrospective study of the pattern of sexually transmitted infections from a tertiary care hospital of Rajasthan. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2017 Jul-Dec;38(2):147-151. PMC free article: PMC6085942 PubMed: 30148268
3. Clebak KT, Malone MA. Skin Infections. Prim Care. 2018 Sep;45(3):433-454. PubMed: 30115333
4. Peterson AR, Nash E, Anderson BJ. Infectious Disease in Contact Sports. Sports Health. 2019 Jan/Feb;11(1):47-58. PMC free article: PMC6299350 PubMed: 30106670
5. Rosner M, Zloto O. Periocular molluscum contagiosum: six different clinical presentations. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;96(5):e600-e605. PubMed: 29855150
6. Leung AKC, Barankin B, Hon KLE. Molluscum Contagiosum: An Update. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2017;11(1):22-31. PubMed: 28521677
7. Ruby KN, Perry AE, Linos K. Expanding the Morphologic Heterogeneity of Stromal Changes in Molluscum Contagiosum Infection. Am J Dermatopathol. 2018 Dec;40(12):941-943. PubMed: 29329128
8. Rayala BZ, Morrell DS. Common Skin Conditions in Children: Skin Infections. FP Essent. 2017 Feb;453:26-32. PubMed: 28196318
9. Lacarrubba F, Verzì AE, Dinotta F, Scavo S, Micali G. Dermatoscopy in inflammatory and infectious skin disorders. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Oct;150(5):521-31. PubMed: 26333553
10. Rush J, Dinulos JG. Childhood skin and soft tissue infections: new discoveries and guidelines regarding the management of bacterial soft tissue infections, molluscum contagiosum, and warts. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016 Apr;28(2):250-7. PubMed: 26900921
11. Fernando I, Pritchard J, Edwards SK, Grover D. UK national guideline for the management of Genital Molluscum in adults, 2014 Clinical Effectiveness Group, British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. Int J STD AIDS. 2015 Sep;26(10):687-95. PubMed: 25332225
12. Brown M, Paulson C, Henry SL. Treatment for anogenital molluscum contagiosum. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Oct 15;80(8):864. PubMed: 19835348
13. Goldman L. Dermatologic surgery in an ambulatory surgery center: ten years’ experience. Cutis. 1984 Jul;34(1):65-6, 68. PubMed: 6467977
14. Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Silverberg NB, Silverberg JI. Efficacy and Safety of Topical Cantharidin Treatment for Molluscum Contagiosum and Warts: A Systematic Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Dec;19(6):791-803. PubMed: 30097988
15. Olsen JR, Gallacher J, Piguet V, Francis NA. Development and validation of the Molluscum Contagiosum Diagnostic Tool for Parents: diagnostic accuracy study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Aug;64(625):e471-6. PMC free article: PMC4111339 PubMed: 25071059
16. Al-Dawsari NA, Masterpol KS. Cantharidin in Dermatology. Skinmed. 2016;14(2):111-4. PubMed: 27319954
17. Singh A, Thappa DM, Hamide A. The spectrum of mucocutaneous manifestations during the evolutionary phases of HIV disease: an emerging Indian scenario. J Dermatol. 1999 May;26(5):294-304. PubMed: 10380430
18. van der Wouden JC, van der Sande R, Kruithof EJ, Sollie A, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, Koning S. Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 17;5(5):CD004767. PMC free article: PMC6481355 PubMed: 28513067