Differential Diagnosis of Abnormal Capnograms in Pediatric Critical Care: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Capnography, the real-time monitoring of carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in respiratory gases, has become an indispensable tool in pediatric respiratory care, particularly within critical care settings [1]. Providing a continuous, non-invasive assessment of ventilation and perfusion, capnography aids clinicians in the early detection of respiratory abnormalities and guides timely interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes [2, 3]. While a normal capnogram offers reassurance, deviations from the typical waveform – abnormal capnograms – can signal a range of underlying pathological conditions. In pediatric critical care, where rapid physiological changes are common and diagnostic challenges are amplified, the ability to perform a differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care scenarios is paramount.

This article delves into the critical aspect of differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram in pediatric critical care. We will explore the various patterns of abnormal capnograms, their potential etiologies in critically ill children, and how to systematically approach their interpretation. By understanding the nuances of capnography waveforms and integrating them with clinical context, healthcare professionals can enhance their diagnostic accuracy, guide appropriate management strategies, and improve the care of their youngest and most vulnerable patients. This comprehensive guide aims to equip clinicians with the knowledge and skills necessary to confidently navigate the complexities of differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram in pediatric critical care.

Basics of Capnography and Normal Waveforms

Before exploring abnormal capnograms, it is essential to revisit the fundamental principles of capnography and the characteristics of a normal waveform. Capnography measures the partial pressure of CO2 in exhaled gas, displaying it both numerically (capnometry, end-tidal CO2 or ETCO2) and graphically (capnogram waveform) [4]. The ETCO2 value in healthy children typically ranges from 35 to 45 mmHg, reflecting adequate ventilation and metabolic CO2 production [6, 7].

The normal capnogram waveform is characterized by four distinct phases (Figure 1):

• Phase I (Inspiratory Baseline): Represents the inhalation of fresh gas, which is essentially CO2-free, resulting in a flat baseline near zero mmHg.
• Phase II (Expiratory Upstroke): Marks the beginning of exhalation as CO2-free gas from the anatomical dead space mixes with alveolar gas, leading to a rapid rise in CO2 concentration.
• Phase III (Alveolar Plateau): Represents the exhalation of alveolar gas, which is rich in CO2. This phase ideally forms a plateau with a slight upward slope, indicating consistent CO2 delivery from the alveoli.
• Phase IV (Inspiratory Downstroke): Signals the end of exhalation and the start of inhalation. The CO2 concentration rapidly drops back to baseline as fresh gas enters the airway.

Figure 1. Illustration of a normal capnogram waveform, highlighting the four phases: Inspiratory Baseline (Phase I), Expiratory Upstroke (Phase II), Alveolar Plateau (Phase III), and Inspiratory Downstroke (Phase IV). Understanding the normal waveform is crucial for identifying deviations and performing differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram in pediatric critical care.

Understanding the normal capnogram is the foundation for recognizing and interpreting abnormalities. Deviations in any of these phases – height, frequency, rhythm, baseline, or shape – can indicate a variety of respiratory, circulatory, and metabolic disturbances, necessitating a systematic approach to differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care cases.

Categories of Abnormal Capnograms and Differential Diagnosis in Pediatric Critical Care

Abnormal capnograms can be broadly categorized based on their deviation from the normal waveform. For effective differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care, it is helpful to classify these abnormalities into distinct patterns:

1. Changes in ETCO2 Value

• Elevated ETCO2 (Hypercapnia): An ETCO2 value above 45 mmHg generally indicates hypoventilation or increased CO2 production. In pediatric critical care, causes include:

  • Inadequate Ventilation: Insufficient respiratory rate or tidal volume on mechanical ventilation, respiratory muscle fatigue, central respiratory depression (e.g., due to sedation or neurological injury).
  • Increased CO2 Production: Fever, sepsis, hypermetabolic states, malignant hyperthermia (rare but critical).
  • Rebreathing: Malfunctioning ventilator circuits, inadequate fresh gas flow in anesthesia circuits.
  • Equipment Malfunction: Capnograph calibration errors.
  • Reduced CO2 Elimination: Severe pulmonary disease (e.g., severe asthma, bronchiolitis, pneumonia), increased dead space ventilation.

• Decreased ETCO2 (Hypocapnia): An ETCO2 value below 35 mmHg typically suggests hyperventilation or decreased CO2 production. In pediatric critical care, consider:

  • Hyperventilation: Excessive mechanical ventilation, pain, anxiety, fever, central nervous system stimulation.
  • Decreased CO2 Production: Hypothermia, decreased metabolic rate.
  • Increased Dead Space Ventilation: Pulmonary embolism (rare in pediatrics but possible), decreased cardiac output, severe hypotension, cardiac arrest.
  • Equipment Issues: Air leak in the sampling system (sidestream capnography), partial airway obstruction (may initially show decreased ETCO2 before rising).

2. Changes in Waveform Shape

• “Shark Fin” Waveform (Obstructive Pattern): Characterized by a prolonged Phase II and a slow, upward sloping Phase III without a distinct plateau. This pattern is classic for:
  • Airway Obstruction: Bronchospasm (asthma, bronchiolitis), mucus plugging, foreign body aspiration, kinked endotracheal tube.
  • Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: Cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).

Figure 2. A “Shark Fin” capnogram waveform, indicative of airway obstruction. In differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care, this pattern strongly suggests conditions like asthma exacerbation or bronchiolitis.

• Curare Cleft: A dip or notch in Phase III, usually indicating:
  • Spontaneous Respiratory Effort During Mechanical Ventilation: Patient attempting to breathe against the ventilator, often seen during weaning or inadequate sedation.
  • Neuromuscular Weakness Recovery: As neuromuscular blockade wears off, spontaneous breaths may appear before full recovery.

Figure 3. A capnogram waveform showing a curare cleft in Phase III. In differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care, this pattern can be seen in patients with spontaneous breaths during mechanical ventilation or recovering from neuromuscular blockade.

• Rebreathing Waveform: Elevated baseline (Phase I not reaching zero) indicates rebreathing of exhaled CO2. Causes include:
  • Faulty Expiratory Valve in Ventilator Circuit.
  • Inadequate Fresh Gas Flow in Anesthesia Circuits.
  • Insufficient CO2 Absorbent in Anesthesia Circuits.

Figure 4. A rebreathing capnogram waveform showing an elevated baseline. In differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care, this pattern points to issues with CO2 elimination from the breathing circuit.

• Cardiac Oscillations: Small, rhythmic oscillations superimposed on Phase III, especially in low cardiac output states. This subtle pattern can suggest:
  • Low Cardiac Output: Hypovolemia, cardiogenic shock, cardiac tamponade.
  • Pulmonary Embolism: (Less common in pediatrics but consider in specific contexts).

Figure 5. Capnogram waveform with cardiac oscillations superimposed on Phase III. In differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care, this pattern can be a subtle indicator of low cardiac output.

• Abrupt Loss of Waveform: Sudden disappearance of the capnogram waveform indicates cessation of CO2 delivery to the sensor. Critical causes include:
  • Esophageal Intubation: Endotracheal tube placed in the esophagus instead of trachea.
  • Disconnection or Leak in Breathing Circuit.
  • Cardiac Arrest: Absence of circulation and CO2 production.
  • Apnea: Cessation of breathing.

3. Changes in Waveform Rhythm and Frequency

• Irregular Rhythm: Inconsistent spacing between waveforms can suggest:

  • Irregular Breathing Pattern: Pain, anxiety, agitation, neurological insult.
  • Ventilator Asynchrony: Patient-ventilator mismatch.

• Increased Frequency (Tachypnea): Rapid waveforms indicate an increased respiratory rate, which could be due to:

  • Pain, Anxiety, Fever, Hypoxemia, Metabolic Acidosis.
  • Compensatory Response to Hypoventilation (initially, before fatigue sets in).

• Decreased Frequency (Bradypnea): Slow waveforms indicate a decreased respiratory rate, potentially caused by:

  • Central Respiratory Depression: Sedation, narcotics, neurological injury.
  • Respiratory Muscle Fatigue.

A Systematic Approach to Differential Diagnosis of Abnormal Capnogram Pediatric Critical Care

When encountering an abnormal capnogram in a pediatric critical care setting, a systematic approach is crucial for accurate differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care. Consider the following steps:

1. Verify Equipment and Technique:

   • Ensure the capnograph is functioning correctly, calibrated, and properly connected.
   • Check for leaks in the sampling system (sidestream) or sensor connections (mainstream).
   • Confirm appropriate placement of the sampling site or sensor.

2. Assess the Clinical Context:

   • Review the patient’s history, presenting condition, and current clinical status.
   • Consider vital signs, oxygen saturation, and other monitoring parameters.
   • Note any recent interventions or changes in therapy.

3. Analyze the Capnogram Pattern:

   • Identify the specific abnormality: ETCO2 value (high or low), waveform shape (shark fin, curare cleft, rebreathing, cardiac oscillations), rhythm, and frequency.
   • Compare the current waveform to previous capnograms, if available, to assess trends.

4. Formulate a Differential Diagnosis:

   • Based on the capnogram pattern and clinical context, generate a list of potential causes.
   • Prioritize diagnoses based on likelihood and clinical urgency.
   • Consider the categories of abnormalities discussed earlier (ETCO2 changes, waveform shape changes, rhythm/frequency changes).

5. Investigate and Confirm Diagnosis:

   • Perform further clinical assessment, including auscultation of breath sounds, chest X-ray, blood gas analysis, etc., as indicated by the differential diagnosis.
   • Consider specific diagnostic tests to rule in or rule out suspected conditions (e.g., bronchoscopy for foreign body aspiration, pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism – less common in pediatrics).

6. Implement Targeted Management:

   • Address the underlying cause identified through the differential diagnosis.
   • Adjust ventilation settings, administer bronchodilators, suction airway secretions, manage circulatory support, etc., as appropriate.
   • Continuously monitor the capnogram to assess response to therapy and guide further management.

Case Studies Illustrating Differential Diagnosis of Abnormal Capnogram in Pediatric Critical Care

Case 1: The Wheezing Infant

A 6-month-old infant presents to the pediatric ICU with severe respiratory distress, marked wheezing, and increased work of breathing. Capnography reveals a “shark fin” waveform with an elevated ETCO2 of 55 mmHg. Oxygen saturation is 88% despite supplemental oxygen.

• Capnogram Pattern: “Shark fin” waveform, elevated ETCO2.
• Differential Diagnosis: Airway obstruction is strongly suggested by the waveform. In a wheezing infant, the most likely diagnosis is bronchiolitis exacerbation with bronchospasm and mucus plugging. Asthma is less common at this age but possible in certain risk groups. Foreign body aspiration is less likely given the wheezing but should be considered if history is unclear or unilateral findings are present.
• Management: Bronchodilators (nebulized albuterol), corticosteroids, suctioning, and potential escalation of respiratory support (CPAP or mechanical ventilation) are indicated.

Case 2: The Post-operative Child

A 5-year-old child is recovering in the PICU after surgery. Mechanical ventilation is in place, and suddenly, the capnogram shows an abrupt loss of waveform.

• Capnogram Pattern: Abrupt loss of waveform.
• Differential Diagnosis: Critical causes must be immediately ruled out. Esophageal intubation is less likely if initial placement was confirmed, but tube displacement can occur. Disconnection or leak in the breathing circuit is a common cause, especially with patient movement. Cardiac arrest or apnea are less likely in a post-operative patient unless a significant event has occurred.
• Management: Immediately assess the patient, check for breathing circuit disconnection, listen for breath sounds bilaterally, and ensure endotracheal tube placement. If esophageal intubation is suspected, reposition the tube and re-verify placement.

Case 3: The Sedated Adolescent

A 16-year-old adolescent is sedated for a procedure. During sedation, the capnogram shows a gradual increase in ETCO2 from 38 mmHg to 50 mmHg, while the waveform remains relatively normal. Oxygen saturation is still 98%.

• Capnogram Pattern: Gradual increase in ETCO2, normal waveform shape.
• Differential Diagnosis: Hypoventilation due to sedation is the most likely cause. Other possibilities include increased CO2 production (fever, though less likely in a controlled setting). Rebreathing is less likely with a normal waveform shape.
• Management: Assess depth of sedation, consider reducing sedative dose if possible, and increase ventilation (increase respiratory rate or tidal volume if mechanically ventilated, stimulate breathing if spontaneously breathing). Continuously monitor capnography and oxygen saturation.

These case examples illustrate how capnogram patterns, combined with clinical context, guide differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care scenarios and inform appropriate management decisions.

Limitations and Challenges in Pediatric Capnography and Differential Diagnosis

While capnography is a powerful tool, there are limitations and challenges to consider, particularly in pediatric critical care:

• Technical Factors: Accuracy can be affected by improper equipment setup, leaks, and sampling site issues. Small tidal volumes in neonates and infants can pose challenges for sidestream capnography.
• Physiological Factors: Rapid respiratory rates and smaller airways in children can influence waveform morphology. Physiological dead space variations can affect ETCO2 accuracy as a surrogate for PaCO2.
• Clinical Interpretation: Abnormal capnogram patterns are not always specific to a single diagnosis. Clinical correlation is essential for accurate differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care.

Despite these challenges, the benefits of capnography in pediatric critical care far outweigh the limitations. Continuous education, training, and adherence to best practices are crucial to maximize the utility of capnography and enhance its role in differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care.

Conclusion

Capnography is an invaluable monitoring modality in pediatric critical care, providing real-time insights into ventilation, perfusion, and metabolism. The ability to perform a differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care scenarios is a critical skill for healthcare professionals working with critically ill children. By understanding normal and abnormal capnogram patterns, considering the clinical context, and following a systematic diagnostic approach, clinicians can effectively utilize capnography to improve diagnostic accuracy, guide timely interventions, and enhance patient safety.

Ongoing research, technological advancements, and continuous education are essential to further refine the application of capnography in pediatric critical care. As we move forward, integrating capnography into standardized pediatric critical care protocols and emphasizing training in waveform interpretation and differential diagnosis of abnormal capnogram pediatric critical care will be key to optimizing its impact on the care of our youngest patients.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: SreeHarsha Damam, Revat J. Meshram, Astha Khurana, Ankita Patel, Rahul Khandelwal, Shikha Kakkat, Sham Lohiya

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: SreeHarsha Damam, Revat J. Meshram, Amar Taksande, Astha Khurana, Ankita Patel, Chaitanya Kumar Javvaji, Shikha Kakkat, Sham Lohiya, Ritwik Nath

Drafting of the manuscript: SreeHarsha Damam, Astha Khurana, Ankita Patel, Rahul Khandelwal

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: SreeHarsha Damam, Revat J. Meshram, Amar Taksande, Ankita Patel, Chaitanya Kumar Javvaji, Rahul Khandelwal, Shikha Kakkat, Sham Lohiya, Ritwik Nath

Supervision: Revat J. Meshram, Amar Taksande, Sham Lohiya

References

[References from original article – keep the same reference list]

[1] Burton MD, Brown C. Capnography for the nonintubated patient in the emergency setting. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25(3):729-46, vi.

[2] Deakers TW. Capnography in the neonate. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;84(2):F83-7.

[3] Kodali BS, Riccardi PJ, Brodsky JB, McGowan FX, Jr., Hackett J, Kumar MA, et al. Capnography and respiratory monitoring outside the operating rooms. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(1):131-56.

[4] Gravenstein JS, Paulus DA, Hayes TJ. Capnography in clinical practice. 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995.

[5] Waugh JB. Capnography in the pediatric emergency department: current uses and future applications. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(2):245-52.

[6] American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Textbook of neonatal resuscitation. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2006.

[7] Krauss B, Hess DR. Capnography for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(2):172-81.

[8] Bhavani-Shankar K, Moseley H, Kumar AY, Delph Y. Capnography: basic principles and clinical applications. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53(3):239-50.

[9] Langhan ML, Shabanova V, Li FY, Bernstein SL, Shapiro N. Quantitative capnography for early detection of critical illness in children: a prospective cohort study. J Crit Care. 2014;29(6):1075-80.

[10] Tobias JD, Leder M. Sedation of children outside of the operating room: current challenges and future directions. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29(4):643-67.

[11] Tobias JD. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during procedural sedation of children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(4):327-32.

[12] De Orange FA, Tobias JD. Capnography during sedation with ketamine in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(12):1147-52.

[13] Miner JR, Minor S, Schindler M, Burton JH. Colorimetric end-tidal carbon dioxide detector performance in the prehospital setting. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;1(4):333-9.

[14] Hunter CL, Silvestri S, Ralls GA. End-tidal carbon dioxide is associated with mortality and neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(1):12-9.

[15] Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH, Monitto CL, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(5):1000-41.

[16] Mason KP, Green SM, Dixon R, Lerman J, Guay J, Kovatsis P, et al. Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Sedation-related adverse events during procedural sedation in children: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):e977-84.

[17] Green SM, Krauss B. Procedural sedation outside of the operating room: moving forward. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007;23(1):46-54.

[18] Lightdale JR, Valim C, Mahoney LB, Leiman DA, Fox VL. Impact of routine capnography monitoring during endoscopy in sedated children: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(3):399-406.

[19] You B, Feng CG, Disdier C, Jaffe MB. Development of a disposable, low-cost capnometer. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(5):1265-9.

[20] Bhende MS, LaCovey DC. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in the pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1995;13(6):787-92.

[21] Sandner-Kiesling A, Weissenbacher P, Haberle H, Trojan S, Krenn CG, Gamper A, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of inspired and end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide by transcutaneous pulse oximetry in children. J Clin Monit Comput. 2003;18(1):35-41.

[22] Langhan ML, Chen L, Nearhoof M, Cantor JB, Shapiro N, Bajaj L. A randomized controlled trial of quantitative capnography during bag-mask ventilation in pediatric patients. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(1):30-7.

[23] Bohnhorst B, Poets CF. Technical problems and limitations of capnography in neonates. J Perinatol. 2004;24(4):211-5.

[24] Chou HC, Wang CH, Chou CC, Huang SH, Chang YJ, Ong JR, et al. Real-time waveform capnography for detection of esophageal intubation during endotracheal intubation. Resuscitation. 2013;84(9):1202-7.

[25] Williamson JA, Pryor JP, Hamilton AG, Grayling M, Pandit JJ. Capnography waveforms and etco2 values during anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(5):411-4.

[26] Gravenstein N. Capnography. In: Ehrenwerth J, Eisenkraft JB, editors. Anesthesia Equipment. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. pp. 283-310.

[27] Zbinden AM, Petersen-Felix S, Thomson DA. Capnography in spontaneously breathing patients. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010;24(2):227-35.

[28] Kelly AM, McWilliams R, Tate R, Marjolin C, Holdgate A, Kuan WS. Utility of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in emergency department patients at risk for hyperkalaemia. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(1):30-4.

[29] Long E, Duke T, Oakley E, Babl FE, Borland ML, Neutze J, et al. Paediatric observational studies of end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement in emergency departments: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(1):50-7.

[30] Callaham M, Barton C. Prediction of outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the initial ECG rhythm. Crit Care Med. 1990;18(4):358-62.

[31] Rich GF, Harris KA, Johnson JP. Accuracy of endotracheal CO2 detectors in children. Crit Care Med. 1990;18(4):392-4.

[32] Goldsmith JP, Carlo WA. Controversies in the management of respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Perinatol. 2001;28(4):735-55.

[33] Galinkin JL, Fazi LM, Ngo L, Green SM. Capnography for respiratory monitoring during pediatric sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5).

[34] Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J. 1974;2(5920):656-9.

[35] Verghese C, Hannallah RS. Advances in monitoring technology and techniques. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23(6):730-6.

[36] Agrawal A, Mishra PK, Bhatnagar V, Agarwal G, Upadhyay A, Katiyar GP. Evaluation of laryngeal mask airway in neonatal resuscitation: a randomized controlled study. J Perinatol. 2011;31(1):6-11.

[37] Tanaka M, Takeda T, Goto T, Otomo Y, Imamura Y, Horiguchi H, et al. Prehospital endotracheal intubation by emergency physicians: a prospective multicenter observational study. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(3):309-14.

[38] Waugh JB, Pilcher J. Capnography in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(2):77-81.

[39] Eichhorn JH, Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, Maier WR, Philip JH, Seeman RG. Standards for patient monitoring during anesthesia at Harvard Medical School. Jama. 1986;256(8):1017-20.

[40] Neubert A, Dormann H, Weissbrodt H, Kraft M, Rascher W, St枚cker T. The impact of guideline development on the quality of recommendations for drug use in children. Drug Saf. 2008;31(4):325-35.

[41] Barlow SE, Expert Committee. Expert committee recommendations for the prevention and management of childhood obesity: executive summary. Pediatrics. 2007;120 Suppl 4:S164-92.

[42] Hagan JF, Jr., Shaw JS, Duncan PM, eds. Bright futures: guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents (pocket guide). 3rd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2008.

[43] Wheeler DS, Wong HR, Shanley TP. PEDIATRIC PRACTICE GUIDELINES. In: Wheeler DS, Wong HR, Shanley TP, editors. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Evidence. London: Springer London; 2007. pp. 1689-727.

[44] Anderson JL, Park YS, Papenfuss M, Hedges JR. A randomized clinical trial of capnography vs. standard monitoring in procedural sedation. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(1):13-7.

[45] De Jong A, Cossic J, Verzilli D, Monet P, Carr J, Catoire P, et al. Randomized controlled study of bag-mask ventilation using capnography vs clinical assessment for detection of esophageal intubation in simulated infant scenario. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(1):e9-e13.

[46] Nikolla D, Rubiano E, Callaway CW, Menegazzi JJ. Waveform capnography during cardiac arrest predicts outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2013;84(5):587-93.

[47] Pedi-Ed-Trics Emergency Medical Solutions. Pediatric Video Tutorial – Capnography. 2023. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdoJjHlQ9NQ. Accessed September 10, 2023.

[48] CapnoAcademy. Home. 2023. Available at: https://www.capnoacademy.com/. Accessed September 10, 2023.

[49] Whyte SD, Magee K, Goodall C, Boyers D, Walker I, Dearie JE, et al. Detection of hypoventilation during sedation using a portable capnograph. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(4):411-4.

[50] Burton JH, Harrahill M. Capnography enhances patient safety during procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2007;24(5):e25.

[51] Waugh JB, Mastropietro CW, Jr., Mulligan J, Sinclair J. The effect of capnography on adverse event rates during pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(5):500-4.

[52] Wetzel RC, Fletcher JE, Stewart TJ. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during general anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg. 1989;69(3):303-7.

[53] Thompson JE, Jaffe MB. Capnography in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018;36(3):485-500.