Differential Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Introduction

Chest pain is a frequently encountered complaint in clinical practice, presenting a significant diagnostic challenge due to its wide range of potential etiologies, from benign to life-threatening conditions. A systematic approach is crucial to effectively evaluate chest pain, prioritizing the rapid identification and exclusion of serious pathologies such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism (PE), and aortic dissection. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the Differential Diagnosis Of Chest Pain, emphasizing the importance of a thorough history, physical examination, and targeted investigations to ensure optimal patient care. It is essential for clinicians to be adept at differentiating between various causes of chest pain, enabling prompt and appropriate management strategies.

Etiology of Chest Pain: Visceral vs. Somatic Pain

Understanding the nature of chest pain begins with differentiating between visceral and somatic pain. Visceral pain often originates from internal organs and is characterized by a vague, poorly localized sensation. Patients typically describe visceral pain as dull, deep, pressure-like, or squeezing, and they may struggle to pinpoint the exact location, often gesturing to a broad area when asked to localize the pain. Furthermore, visceral pain can be referred to distant sites due to the convergence of visceral and somatic nerve fibers at the spinal cord. A classic example is ischemic cardiac pain, which can radiate to the left or right shoulder, jaw, or left arm. Associated symptoms like nausea and vomiting can also suggest visceral involvement. Diaphragmatic irritation, another form of visceral pain, may be referred to the shoulder region.

In contrast, somatic pain is more localized and arises from the musculoskeletal system or skin. Patients can usually point to a specific spot of somatic pain with a single finger. Descriptors for somatic pain often include sharp, stabbing, or poking sensations. Referral to other body parts is less common with somatic pain. Distinguishing between these pain types is a crucial first step in narrowing the differential diagnosis of chest pain.

Epidemiology and Life-Threatening Causes

Chest pain is a prevalent complaint, particularly in emergency department settings, where it accounts for approximately 5% of all visits, making it the second most common presenting symptom. When evaluating chest pain, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for life-threatening etiologies. Studies have provided insights into the prevalence of various causes of chest pain in emergency department settings. The following list highlights critical, life-threatening conditions and their approximate occurrence in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department, based on research by Fruergaard et al.:

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): Approximately 31%
Pulmonary Embolism (PE): Around 2%
Pneumothorax (PTX): Incidence varies and is often underreported in broad epidemiological studies.
Pericardial Tamponade: While pericarditis is more common (around 4%), tamponade is a critical complication, though its exact presentation rate in undifferentiated chest pain is not specifically reported.
Aortic Dissection: Approximately 1%
Esophageal Perforation: Rare, with unreported precise incidence in this context, but a critical diagnosis to consider.

Beyond these immediate threats, other common, though less acutely life-threatening, causes of chest pain include:

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD): Roughly 30%
Musculoskeletal Causes: Around 28%
Pneumonia/Pleuritis: Approximately 2%
Herpes Zoster (Shingles): About 0.5%
Pericarditis: Incidence varies, but reported around 4% in some studies.

This epidemiological context underscores the importance of a structured approach to chest pain, ensuring that high-risk conditions are rapidly identified and managed while also considering more common, benign causes.

History and Physical Examination in Chest Pain Assessment

A comprehensive evaluation of chest pain starts with a detailed history and physical examination.

History Taking

A thorough history is paramount in the chest pain workup. Begin by exploring the patient’s chief complaint in detail, using the mnemonic OLD CARTS (Onset, Location, Duration, Character, Aggravating/Alleviating factors, Radiation, Timing, and Severity) or similar frameworks to guide questioning.

Onset: Determine when the pain started and what the patient was doing at the time. Was it triggered by exertion or did it occur at rest? The circumstances surrounding the onset can provide crucial clues.
Location: Ask the patient to pinpoint the pain. Is it localized or diffuse? Localized pain may suggest somatic origin, while diffuse pain might indicate visceral involvement.
Duration: How long does the pain episode last? Is it constant or intermittent? The duration of pain can help differentiate between acute and chronic conditions.
Character: Encourage the patient to describe the pain in their own words. Is it sharp, dull, pressure-like, burning, or stabbing? The quality of pain can suggest different etiologies.
Aggravating/Alleviating Factors: Identify factors that worsen or relieve the pain. Is it related to exertion, breathing, eating, or body position? Inquire about new exercise routines, sports activities, or lifting. Also, ask about any medications tried and their effects.
Radiation: Does the pain radiate to other areas? Radiation to the arm, jaw, or back may suggest cardiac ischemia.
Timing: How frequently does the pain occur? Are there specific times of day or night when it is more pronounced? Understanding the temporal pattern of pain is important.
Severity: Quantify the pain intensity using a pain scale (e.g., 0-10). Assess how the pain impacts the patient’s daily activities.

Inquire about associated symptoms, which can further refine the differential diagnosis:

Shortness of Breath (Dyspnea): May suggest cardiac or pulmonary etiologies.
Nausea and Vomiting: Can be associated with visceral pain, including cardiac ischemia.
Fever: Suggests infection, such as pneumonia or pleuritis.
Diaphoresis (Sweating): A common symptom in ACS.
Cough: May indicate respiratory conditions like pneumonia or bronchitis.
Dyspepsia (Indigestion): Can be related to GERD or, in some cases, cardiac issues.
Edema (Swelling): May suggest heart failure or other systemic conditions.
Calf Pain or Swelling: Raises suspicion for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and potential PE.
Recent Illness: Recent upper respiratory infection (URI) could predispose to pneumonia or pleuritis.

Risk factor assessment is crucial. Evaluate for:

ACS Risk Factors: Prior myocardial infarction (MI), family history of cardiac disease, smoking, hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), and diabetes.
PE Risk Factors: Prior DVT or PE, hormone use (including oral contraceptives), recent surgery, cancer, or prolonged immobility.
Recent Gastrointestinal (GI) Procedures: Procedures like endoscopy can, rarely, lead to esophageal perforation.
Drug Abuse: Cocaine and methamphetamine use are associated with ACS.

Obtain a detailed medical history, including cardiac conditions, coagulopathies, and kidney disease. Family history, particularly of cardiac disease, and social history, including drug and tobacco use, are also important.

After considering life-threatening causes, explore other possibilities. Pneumonia should be considered in patients with productive cough or recent URI. GERD is a frequent cause of chest pain; inquire about reflux symptoms. New exercise routines or recent trauma may point to musculoskeletal pain.

Physical Examination

The physical examination should be systematic and comprehensive:

Vital Signs: Measure a full set of vitals, including blood pressure (BP) in both arms to check for discrepancies suggestive of aortic dissection.
General Appearance: Note the patient’s overall condition, including signs of distress or diaphoresis.
Skin Examination: Inspect for rashes or lesions, such as those associated with herpes zoster (shingles).
Neck Examination: Assess for jugular venous distension (JVD), particularly with inspiration (Kussmaul’s sign), which can indicate pericardial tamponade or right heart failure.
Chest Examination: Palpate the chest wall to identify areas of reproducible pain, suggesting musculoskeletal origin. Check for crepitus, which may indicate subcutaneous air from pneumothorax or esophageal perforation.
Heart Auscultation: Listen for heart sounds, murmurs, or pericardial friction rubs.
Lung Auscultation: Assess breath sounds for abnormalities like wheezing, crackles, or diminished breath sounds, which may indicate pneumonia, pneumothorax, or pulmonary edema.
Abdominal Examination: Palpate the abdomen to rule out referred pain from abdominal pathology or to assess for signs of GERD-related discomfort.
Extremities Examination: Check for unilateral swelling, calf tenderness, edema, and assess peripheral pulses for symmetry and equality.

Diagnostic Evaluation of Chest Pain

Based on the history and physical examination, guide further investigations. Many institutions have established protocols for chest pain evaluation. At minimum, initial investigations should include:

Electrocardiogram (ECG): Obtain an ECG preferably within 10 minutes of arrival, and consider serial ECGs to detect evolving changes indicative of ACS.
Chest X-ray: Useful for evaluating for pneumonia, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and other pulmonary or mediastinal abnormalities.

Depending on the clinical suspicion, further investigations may include:

Blood Tests: Complete blood count (CBC), basic metabolic panel (BMP), troponin levels (consider serial troponin measurements 4 hours apart to assess for myocardial injury), and lipase (if pancreatitis is suspected).
Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA): The preferred imaging modality if pulmonary embolism is suspected.
Ventilation-Perfusion (VQ) Scan: An alternative to CTPA if CT contrast is contraindicated or less readily available.
Bedside Ultrasound (US): Rapidly assess for pericardial effusion/tamponade, pneumothorax, and other conditions at the point of care.

Treatment and Management Strategies

Management of chest pain is dictated by the underlying diagnosis. Prioritize immediate interventions for life-threatening conditions.

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

While detailed ACS management is extensive, initial steps are critical. Place the patient on a cardiac monitor, establish intravenous (IV) access, administer chewable aspirin (162-325 mg), and consider antiplatelet agents like clopidogrel or ticagrelor (unless urgent bypass surgery is anticipated). Manage pain and consider oxygen therapy. Nitroglycerin can be beneficial, aiming for a 10% reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in normotensive patients and a 30% reduction in hypertensive patients, but avoid in hypotension or inferior ST-elevation MI.

For ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on ECG, immediate reperfusion therapy is essential, either pharmacologic (thrombolytics) or preferably percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PCI is preferred and should be initiated within 90 minutes if onsite or 120 minutes if transfer is needed. If PCI is not feasible, thrombolytics should be given within 30 minutes. Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina require hospital admission for cardiology consultation and further workup. Stable angina may be managed outpatient. Elderly patients and those with comorbidities should often be admitted for observation and cardiac assessment.

Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

CTPA is the definitive diagnostic test. A VQ scan can be an alternative, but it is less sensitive in patients with pre-existing lung disease. For hemodynamically unstable patients, thrombolytics should be initiated. Stable patients should receive anticoagulation therapy promptly.

Pneumothorax (PTX)

Tension pneumothorax requires immediate decompression, typically with needle thoracostomy followed by chest tube placement. Smaller pneumothoraces may be observed or managed with aspiration or chest tube depending on size and patient stability.

Pericardial Tamponade

Bedside ultrasound is highly valuable for rapid diagnosis. A fluid bolus may temporarily improve hemodynamics. Definitive treatment involves pericardiocentesis (needle drainage) or surgical pericardial window to relieve pressure.

Aortic Dissection

Aortic dissection is a surgical emergency. Early cardiothoracic surgery consultation is crucial. CT angiography is the diagnostic modality of choice. Immediately manage blood pressure, aiming for a systolic BP of 100-120 mmHg, typically starting with beta-blockers to control heart rate and reduce aortic wall stress, preventing reflex tachycardia.

Esophageal Perforation

Suspect esophageal rupture with left pleural effusion on chest x-ray. Contrast esophagram is the confirmatory test. This is a surgical emergency requiring immediate surgical consultation.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

A “GI cocktail” (viscous lidocaine and antacid) can be administered for symptomatic relief, but it is not diagnostic and ACS can mimic GERD. Rule out ACS before attributing chest pain to GERD. Long-term GERD management involves proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or H2 receptor antagonists.

Differential Diagnosis Summary

The differential diagnosis of chest pain is broad and includes:

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
Aortic Dissection
Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain
Esophageal Rupture
Pericarditis
Pneumonia
Herpes Zoster (Shingles)
Pneumothorax
Cervical Radiculopathy
Esophageal Spasm

Clinical Pearls and Important Considerations

Aortic dissection can present with stroke symptoms; consider it in the differential. Remember that younger patients and those without traditional risk factors can still experience myocardial infarction. Patients with diabetes and elderly individuals may have atypical presentations of ACS due to neuropathy affecting pain perception. Maintain a broad differential and consider atypical presentations, especially in vulnerable populations.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Effective management of chest pain requires a collaborative interprofessional team, including nurse practitioners, primary care providers, internists, emergency physicians, and surgeons. A thorough medical history often provides key diagnostic clues. The paramount goal is to avoid missing life-threatening conditions like ACS or aortic dissection. When the etiology of chest pain remains uncertain, referral to a specialist is recommended to ensure appropriate care and improve patient outcomes, which vary significantly depending on the underlying cause.

References

1.Jänig W. [Neurobiology of visceral pain]. Schmerz. 2014 Jun;28(3):233-51. [PubMed: 24903037]

2.Fruergaard P, Launbjerg J, Hesse B, Jørgensen F, Petri A, Eiken P, Aggestrup S, Elsborg L, Mellemgaard K. The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1996 Jul;17(7):1028-34. [PubMed: 8809520]

3.de Bliek EC. ST elevation: Differential diagnosis and caveats. A comprehensive review to help distinguish ST elevation myocardial infarction from nonischemic etiologies of ST elevation. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;18(1):1-10. [PMC free article: PMC6009807] [PubMed: 29942875]

4.Solhpour A, Chang KW, Arain SA, Balan P, Zhao Y, Loghin C, McCarthy JJ, Vernon Anderson H, Smalling RW. Comparison of 30-day mortality and myocardial scar indices for patients treated with prehospital reduced dose fibrinolytic followed by percutaneous coronary intervention versus percutaneous coronary intervention alone for treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;88(5):709-715. [PubMed: 27028120]

5.Fruergaard P, Launbjerg J, Hesse B. Frequency of pulmonary embolism in patients admitted with chest pain and suspicion of acute myocardial infarction but in whom this diagnosis is ruled out. Cardiology. 1996 Jul-Aug;87(4):331-4. [PubMed: 8793169]

6.Meyer G. Effective diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism: Improving patient outcomes. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Jun-Jul;107(6-7):406-14. [PubMed: 25023859]

7.Habibi B, Achachi L, Hayoun S, Raoufi M, Herrak L, Ftouh ME. [Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: about 138 cases]. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:152. [PMC free article: PMC5429453] [PubMed: 28533875]

8.Hsu KA, Levsky JM, Haramati LB, Gohari A. Performance of a simple robust empiric timing protocol for CT pulmonary angiography. Clin Imaging. 2018 Mar-Apr;48:17-21. [PubMed: 29024836]

9.Shokoohi H, Boniface KS, Zaragoza M, Pourmand A, Earls JP. Point-of-care ultrasound leads to diagnostic shifts in patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;35(12):1984.e3-1984.e7. [PubMed: 28851498]

10.Zhao DL, Liu XD, Zhao CL, Zhou HT, Wang GK, Liang HW, Zhang JL. Multislice spiral CT angiography for evaluation of acute aortic syndrome. Echocardiography. 2017 Oct;34(10):1495-1499. [PubMed: 28833419]

11.Shiber JR, Fontane E, Ra JH, Kerwin AJ. Hydropneumothorax Due to Esophageal Rupture. J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):856-858. [PubMed: 28336238]

12.Khoynezhad A, Plestis KA. Managing emergency hypertension in aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm surgery. J Card Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;21 Suppl 1:S3-7. [PubMed: 16492293]

13.Alzubaidi M, Gabbard S. GERD: Diagnosing and treating the burn. Cleve Clin J Med. 2015 Oct;82(10):685-92. [PubMed: 26469826]