Recent research highlights a significant issue affecting individuals aged 60 and above: the co-occurrence of alcohol and substance abuse with mental health disorders. This combination, known as “dual diagnosis,” is particularly concerning in older adults as it elevates the risk of suicide. This article delves into the prevalence and factors associated with dual diagnosis within elderly psychiatric inpatient populations, drawing comparisons with younger demographics and emphasizing the critical need for targeted elder care strategies.
The term “dual diagnosis” describes the coexistence of a psychiatric disorder alongside alcohol or drug addiction. Studies indicate that this co-occurrence is not merely coincidental but happens more frequently than expected. Data from the National Institute of Mental Health’s Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (ECA) reveals alarmingly high lifetime prevalence rates of substance abuse among individuals with mental illnesses, reaching up to 87% in those with antisocial personality disorders, 56% in bipolar disorder, 47% in schizophrenia, and 32% in depressive disorders. These elevated rates extend to various populations, including psychiatric inpatients, individuals with intellectual disabilities, the homeless, those in emergency departments, primary care settings, and even prison populations, where comorbidity rates can soar as high as 94%. It’s also crucial to note that individuals with dual diagnoses often experience poorer clinical outcomes compared to those with only a psychiatric disorder, highlighting the complexities of Dual Diagnosis Elder Care.
Several theories attempt to explain the development of dual diagnosis. One posits that a primary psychiatric illness emerges first, leading individuals to self-medicate with substances to alleviate symptoms. Conversely, another theory suggests that substance abuse itself can trigger or worsen underlying psychiatric conditions, such as depression arising from prolonged alcohol use. A third perspective proposes that in some cases, these disorders are independent of each other, neither causing nor resulting from the other.
Diagnosing dual diagnosis presents unique challenges as the conditions can intricately complicate each other. Research has sought to identify factors associated with dual diagnosis to aid in more accurate identification and effective intervention. Studies have pointed to variables like physical and neurological complaints, pre-treatment depressive states, early sexual abuse, emotionally driven substance abuse, anxiety during sobriety, and the use of multiple substances as potential indicators of dual diagnosis. These insights are invaluable for professionals providing dual diagnosis elder care.
Patients with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders often exhibit a range of challenging characteristics, including polysubstance abuse, illicit drug use, violent or criminal behavior, elevated suicide rates, denial of problems, unstable housing, and homelessness. Furthermore, the severity of psychiatric symptoms in individuals seeking substance abuse treatment is a significant predictor of treatment success, with more severe symptoms often correlating with poorer outcomes. Understanding these complexities is paramount in delivering effective dual diagnosis elder care.
Dual Diagnosis and the Unique Needs of Elder Care
Between 15% and 25% of older adults in the US experience clinically significant mental health symptoms, and 12–15% have mental disorders requiring professional intervention. Dementia and cognitive impairment affect 2–14% of older adults, with incidence rising with age. Anxiety symptoms are prevalent in 10–20% of this population, and significant depressive symptoms affect 15–20% of community-dwelling individuals over 65. Depression is also common among medically ill elderly outpatients (12–36%) and inpatients (over one-third). Compounding these challenges, recent data indicates that individuals in their sixties and beyond are also experiencing significant alcohol and substance abuse problems, with community prevalence rates ranging from 1% to 20%. Alarmingly, 10–15% of elders seeking medical help have alcohol-related issues, and hospitalization rates due to alcohol-related problems for those 65 and over are substantial (54.7% for men and 14.8% for women per 10,000). Both alcoholism and depression are established risk factors for suicide in older adults, a critical concern for dual diagnosis elder care. Despite often being overlooked, suicide in this population is a stark reality, with older adults accounting for one in four suicides and experiencing a suicide rate 50% higher than younger individuals.
Despite the severity and prevalence, research specifically addressing comorbid mental and substance use disorders in those aged 65 and older remains limited. One retrospective study of 21 dually diagnosed older patients (average age 60.1) found high rates of personality disorder plus alcohol abuse (29%) and mood disorder plus alcohol abuse (48%). Another study in England examining mentally ill elders aged 65–69 identified a significant proportion with problem drinking (13% diagnosed, 6% subsequently identified). These studies, while valuable, often focus on predominantly male subjects and single data collection sites and lack comparisons to younger dually diagnosed populations. This highlights a critical gap in research and underscores the need for more focused attention on dual diagnosis elder care.
To address these limitations, a study was conducted to examine the prevalence of dual diagnosis in older psychiatric inpatient populations, compare findings with younger patients, and discuss implications for policy and practice in dual diagnosis elder care.
Methodology of the Study on Dual Diagnosis Elder Care
Sample Selection
This descriptive, retrospective study reviewed records of 101 community-dwelling older adults, aged 65 and over, discharged home from three private psychiatric hospitals in the southern United States. These elders received follow-up short-term psychotherapy at home by advanced practice geropsychiatric nurses, reimbursed under Medicare Part B for homecare services – a crucial aspect of dual diagnosis elder care within a home setting.
Variables Examined in Elder Care
The study focused on variables obtainable through retrospective chart review and the Health Care Financing Administration Home Health Certification Form (HCFA-485). This included clinical variables such as hospital stay length, psychiatric and medical diagnoses, medications (psychotropic and regular), and history of suicidal thoughts or attempts. Socio-demographic variables included age, gender, race, marital status, and living arrangements. Social support was categorized as informal (friends, relatives) and formal (paid professionals). For the study, individuals with a DSM-III-R substance abuse diagnosis alongside a psychiatric diagnosis were classified as the ‘dual diagnosis’ group, while those with only a psychiatric diagnosis formed the ‘psychiatric’ group. This classification is vital for understanding the specific needs within dual diagnosis elder care.
Data Analysis Techniques
Basic descriptive statistics (frequencies, means, standard deviations) were employed to analyze the study data. To identify differences between the dual diagnosis and psychiatric groups, the Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. These statistical methods are essential for drawing meaningful conclusions about dual diagnosis elder care.
Key Findings: Prevalence and Characteristics of Dual Diagnosis in Elder Care
The study revealed that while 62.4% of older adults admitted to psychiatric hospitals had only a psychiatric disorder, a significant 37.6% presented with dual diagnosis – both a psychiatric and a substance abuse disorder. Among these dually diagnosed elders, 71% abused only alcohol, while 29% abused both alcohol and other addictive substances. Notably, almost all (89.5%) with an alcohol diagnosis were early onset abusers, with a history of drinking for over 15 years.
The study sample was predominantly Caucasian (98%), unmarried (73.3%), and female (68%), with an average psychiatric hospital stay of 18.7 days. While the dual diagnosis group was slightly younger (mean age 73.3) than the psychiatric diagnosis group (mean age 75.0), this age difference wasn’t statistically significant. No significant correlation was found between diagnostic group and the number of comorbid medical conditions. Cardiovascular problems were the most prevalent comorbid medical issues in both groups (45.5%), followed by musculoskeletal (35.6%) and gastrointestinal (21.1%) problems in the dual diagnosis group, and eye and ear (22.2%) and neurological (19%) problems in the psychiatric diagnosis group. As anticipated, a statistically significant relationship existed between diagnostic group type and the number of psychiatric diagnoses, with the dual diagnosis group having more psychiatric diagnoses (mean 1.8) compared to the psychiatric group (mean 1.2). This highlights the complexity in dual diagnosis elder care.
Although over half the sample (55.4%) lived alone, no significant relationship was found between diagnostic group and living arrangement type. Most subjects (90%) had informal social support, but 10% lacked significant support. Regarding formal social support, over a quarter (26.7%) had two to three homecare services, but nearly three-quarters had none. No significant relationship was observed between diagnostic group and social support type.
Depression was the leading psychiatric diagnosis in both groups (73.3%), followed by psychoses (10%), bipolar disorder (7%), and dementia (7%). Other psychiatric diagnoses, such as anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychosomatic disorder, and dependent personality, were significantly more prevalent in the dual diagnosis group. This diagnostic profile is crucial for tailoring dual diagnosis elder care approaches.
Antidepressants were the most commonly prescribed psychotropic medications (60.4%). No significant differences were found in the overall amount of psychotropic medications taken by the two groups. However, significantly more older adults in the psychiatric diagnosis group (43.1%) were taking antidepressants compared to the dual diagnosis group (35.4%).
While no significant group differences were observed in expressed suicidal ideation before admission, a significantly higher proportion of elders in the dual diagnosis group (17.7%) were admitted to the psychiatric hospital following a suicide attempt, compared to the psychiatric diagnosis group (3.3%). This stark difference underscores the elevated suicide risk associated with dual diagnosis and the importance of suicide prevention strategies in dual diagnosis elder care.
Discussion: Implications for Dual Diagnosis Elder Care
The study acknowledges limitations inherent in using medical records, such as potential incompleteness or lack of patient input. Diagnostic discrepancies across clinical sites are also possible despite DSM-III-R criteria usage. However, this research provides crucial prevalence data on dual diagnosis in older psychiatric inpatients and compares findings to younger populations, contributing significantly to the understanding of dual diagnosis elder care.
Key findings warrant careful consideration. The 37.6% prevalence of dual diagnosis in hospitalized older psychiatric patients is higher than the 19% found in a UK study but aligns with US studies on younger dually diagnosed psychiatric inpatients. Interestingly, the dually diagnosed elders in this sample were predominantly female (63.2%), contrasting with younger groups typically being predominantly male. This gender difference is an important consideration in dual diagnosis elder care planning.
Another notable difference lies in substance abuse patterns. While younger dually diagnosed populations show 34.1% alcohol disorders and 16.1% other drug abuse disorders, elderly patients in this study showed 71% alcohol abuse and 29% combined alcohol and other substance abuse. Furthermore, older adults tended to abuse prescription drugs (sedatives, anti-anxiety medications), whereas younger populations more commonly use illicit drugs. These distinct patterns emphasize the need for age-specific approaches in dual diagnosis elder care.
Antisocial personality disorder is common in younger dually diagnosed groups, but depression was the leading mental disorder diagnosis in this elderly sample. This may be due to personality diagnoses being overlooked in older adults or depression being a common outcome for early-onset substance abusers with antisocial tendencies. The prominence of depression further highlights its central role in dual diagnosis elder care.
Chronic physical conditions also complicate diagnosis and treatment in older adults with dual diagnosis. Physical illnesses can trigger or exacerbate depressive symptoms, and medications for physical conditions can also induce depression. Age-related slower drug metabolism increases the risk of drug interactions and depressive side effects. These factors must be carefully managed in dual diagnosis elder care.
A major study finding was the high percentage of older adults with both alcohol abuse and affective disorders who attempted suicide prior to hospitalization. The strong link between dual diagnosis and suicide attempts underscores the urgent need for routine, comprehensive diagnostic assessment and screening for both substance abuse and mental disorders in older adults. This proactive approach is vital for effective dual diagnosis elder care and suicide prevention.
Conclusions: Enhancing Dual Diagnosis Elder Care Strategies
These findings expand upon previous research on comorbid substance abuse in hospitalized older adults with mental disorders. The higher prevalence rates of substance abuse in this elderly psychiatric patient sample compared to younger groups emphasize the widespread nature of dual diagnosis in older adults. Treating dual diagnosis is complex, demanding specialized treatment approaches and settings. However, older adults with these co-occurring disorders also face age-related health issues and personal losses, requiring tailored treatment plans that differ from those for younger adults. Future prospective studies evaluating outcomes of specialized treatment modalities for dually diagnosed elders are crucial to reduce the personal and societal costs associated with these complex conditions and improve dual diagnosis elder care.
References
[R32] McKenna, R. J., & Paredes, A. (1992). The disease model of alcoholism: Its implications for treatment. Alcohol Health & Research World, 16(2), 159-165.
[R51] Turnbull, J. M., & Roszell, D. K. (1993). Dual diagnosis: An overview of substance abuse and mental illness. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71(3), 297-301.
[R42] Riley, D. M. (1994). Dual diagnosis: Alcoholism and other psychiatric disorders. Disease-a-Month, 40(1), 1-64.
[R40] Regier, D. A., Farmer, M. E., Rae, D. S., Locke, B. Z., Keith, S. J., Judd, L. L., & Goodwin, F. K. (1990). Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse. Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA, 264(19), 2511-2518.
[R23] Gabriel, R. M. (1994). Substance abuse and mental retardation: A review and analysis. Mental Retardation, 32(2), 129-135.
[R41] Reiss, S. (1990). Assessment of dual diagnosis individuals with mental retardation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(2), 95-101.
[R30] Matson, J. L., & Barrett, R. P. (Eds.). (1992). Psychopathology in persons with mental retardation. Research and Training Center in Mental Retardation.
[R11] Caton, C. L., Tietjen, G. E., Drake, R. E., Knudson, J. W., Kukla, M., & Brown, M. L. (1994). Prevalence and characteristics of substance abuse among homeless individuals with chronic mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 84(8), 1303-1307.
[R24] Kahn, R. S., Zimmer, C., & Caton, C. L. (1992). Homelessness and mental illness: A report of the Task Force on Homelessness and Severe Mental Illness. American Psychiatric Association.
[R29] Lieberman, J. A., & Baker, D. D. (1985). Substance abuse in chronic schizophrenic patients. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 36(6), 609-612.
[R49] Szuster, R. R., Schanilec, C. A., & Marten, D. F. (1990). Emergency psychiatric patients with alcohol-related problems. General Hospital Psychiatry, 12(3), 153-158.
[R46] Sanguineti, V. R., & Samuel, S. E. (1993). Substance abuse in psychiatric emergency room patients. Psychiatric Services, 44(5), 465-468.
[R16] Crum, R. M., & Ford, D. E. (1994). Substance abuse and mental disorders in primary care. Primary Care, 21(3), 535-550.
[R1] Abram, K. M., & Teplin, L. A. (1991). Co-occurring disorders among mentally ill jail detainees: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 81(12), 1603-1609.
[R27] Lehman, A. F., Myers, C. P., & Corty, E. (1989). Prevalence and patterns of substance abuse in chronic schizophrenic patients. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 40(11), 1189-1191.
[R33] McKenna, R. J., & Ross, R. J. (1994). Identifying the dually diagnosed patient. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 11(1-2), 1-15.
[R9] Castenada, R., Cushman, P., & de Leon, G. (1989). Self-medication and the addictive disorders. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 21(2), 157-164.
[R25] Khantzian, E. J. (1985). The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: Focus on heroin and cocaine dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142(11), 1259-1264.
[R35] Minkoff, K. (1989). An integrated treatment model for dual diagnosis of psychosis and addiction. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 40(10), 1031-1036.
[R12] Chris Heh, V. W., Katz, J. L., & Salzman, C. (1990). Pretreatment and posttreatment depressive states in alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 14(2), 264-269.
[R37] Mulvey, E. P., Arthur, M. W., & Reppucci, N. D. (1994). The prevention of substance abuse and mental disorders: A conceptual framework. Prevention in Human Services, 11(2), 9-30.
[R26] Laporte, D. J., McLellan, A. T., Erdlen, F. R., & Parente, R. (1981). The treatment outcome of patients entering drug abuse treatment with psychiatric disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 169(1), 32-37.
[R18] Evans, D. A., Funkenstein, H. H., Albert, M. S., Scherr, P. A., Cook, N. R., Chown, M. J., … & Taylor, J. O. (1990). Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in a community population of older persons. Higher than previously reported. JAMA, 262(18), 2551-2556.
[R6] Blixen, C. E. (1994). Alcohol and drug use in older adults. Substance Use & Misuse, 29(9), 1153-1181.
[R21] Folstein, M. F., Anthony, J. C., Parhad, I., Duffy, V., Gruenberg, E. M., & McHugh, P. R. (1985). The meaning of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 33(4), 228-235.
[R17] Evans, D. A., Scherr, P. A., Cook, N. R., Albert, M. S., Funkenstein, H. H., Smith, L. A., … & Taylor, J. O. (1989). Estimated prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society, 67(2), 489-515.
[R3] Anthony, J. C., & Aboraya, A. (1992). The epidemiology of selected mental disorders in later life. In Handbook of mental health and aging (pp. 73-101). Academic Press.
[R31] McDougall, G. J. (1995). Alzheimer’s disease: A review. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 95(1), 19-25.
[R47] Sheikh, J. I. (1992). Anxiety disorders. In Handbook of mental health and aging (pp. 435-460). Academic Press.
[R38] NIH. (1991). Depression in late life. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement, 9(2), 1-27.
[R50] Steiner, V., & Marcopulos, B. A. (1991). Screening for depression in chronic medical illness. General Hospital Psychiatry, 13(4), 269-275.
[R43] Rodin, G. M., & Voshart, K. (1986). Depression in the medically ill: An overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143(6), 696-705.
[R7] Blixen, C. E., & Wilkinson, W. E. (1994). Depression and chronic medical illness. Nursing Research, 43(3), 172-178.
[R4] Atkinson, R. M., Misra, S. I., & Youssef, Y. Y. (1992). Alcohol and drug use in the elderly. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33(3), 135-141.
[R5] Blixen, C. E. (1988). Alcoholism in the elderly: A review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 14(11), 22-27.
[R2] Adams, W. L., Yuan, Z., Barboriak, J. J., & Rimm, A. A. (1993). Alcohol-related hospitalizations of elderly people. JAMA, 270(10), 1222-1225.
[R14] Conwell, Y., Duberstein, P. R., Cox, C., Erlangsen, F., & King, D. (1990). Alcoholism and suicide in older men. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 14(2), 270-274.
[R15] Conwell, Y., Duberstein, P. R., & Caine, E. D. (1991). Suicide in elderly men: A case-control study. International Psychogeriatrics, 3(2), 193-208.
[R39] Osgood, N. J., Brantner, J. P., & Cutler, S. J. (1991). Suicide in late life: Research and clinical dilemmas. Springer Publishing Company.
[R22] Friesen, E. M. (1991). Suicide in the elderly. Clinical Geriatrics, 2(3), 37-45.
[R48] Speer, D. C. (1990). Alcohol and drug abuse among older adults in a state psychiatric facility. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 7(1), 1-16.
[R34] Mears, N., & Spice, C. (1993). Problem drinking among elderly people admitted to a psychiatric unit. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8(1), 25-30.
[R28] Lehman, A. F., Herron, V. E., Schwartz, R. P., & Myers, C. P. (1993). Substance use disorders in severely mentally ill patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(7), 1022-1028.
[R20] Fogel, B. S., & Westlake, R. (1990). Personality disorders in the elderly. In Handbook of personality disorders: Theory and practice (pp. 459-480). Guilford Press.
[R44] Sadavoy, J., & Fogel, B. S. (1992). Personality disorders in late life. In Handbook of mental health and aging (pp. 461-488). Academic Press.
[R19] Fogel, B. S., Furukawa, T., & Steiner, J. (1990). Depression in medical illness. In Handbook of affective disorders in the elderly (pp. 395-420). Academic Press.
[R45] Sadovoy, J., Lazarus, L. W., Jarvik, L. F., & Grossberg, G. T. (1990). Comprehensive review of geriatric psychiatry. American Psychiatric Press.
[R36] Moscicki, E. K. (1995). Epidemiology of suicide in older adults. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 11(2), 253-267.
[R13] Conwell, Y., & Brent, D. (1995). Suicide and aging. II. Psychosocial aspects and intervention strategies. International Psychogeriatrics, 7(2), 163-197.
