Head Trauma Differential Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Guide for Emergency Assessment

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), resulting from an external mechanical force to the head, is a critical concern in emergency medicine. TBIs are broadly categorized as either closed or penetrating, the latter involving a breach of the skull and dura mater. Closed head injury (CHI) is the more prevalent form and encompasses conditions like concussion, contusion, diffuse axonal injury, and various intracranial hematomas, including epidural, subdural, subarachnoid, and intraparenchymal hemorrhages. This article will specifically address closed head injuries, using the terms TBI and CHI interchangeably, to provide a detailed guide for healthcare professionals involved in the initial evaluation and management of these complex cases. Accurately establishing a Head Trauma Differential Diagnosis is paramount for effective patient care and optimal outcomes.

TBI severity is often classified using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) into mild (GCS 14-15), moderate (GCS 9-13), and severe (GCS 3-8) categories. Mild TBI, commonly known as concussion, constitutes the majority, accounting for over 80% of all TBIs. Moderate and severe TBIs represent approximately 10% and a smaller percentage respectively, but are associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality. Understanding the nuances of head trauma differential diagnosis is crucial for clinicians to navigate the complexities of these injuries and ensure timely and appropriate interventions.

Etiology of Closed Head Injury

Falls are the leading cause of closed head injuries, responsible for more than 35% of cases. Motor vehicle accidents and traffic-related incidents are another significant cause. Other etiologies include violent acts, workplace accidents, and sports-related injuries. In evaluating a patient with CHI, it is essential to consider the possibility of non-accidental trauma, particularly elder abuse and domestic violence. Recognizing these diverse causes is a key step in forming a comprehensive head trauma differential diagnosis, as the mechanism of injury can provide valuable clues about the potential types and severity of brain injury.

Epidemiology of Closed Head Injury

Closed head injuries disproportionately affect men across all age demographics. Falls are the primary cause of TBI in children aged 0 to 14 years and adults aged 65 years and older. In children aged 0 to 14, being struck by or against an object is the second most common cause, whereas motor vehicle/traffic injuries are the second leading cause in other age groups. Globally, TBI is a major contributor to trauma-related deaths, accounting for over 30% of fatalities. These epidemiological trends are important to consider when approaching a head trauma differential diagnosis, as age and mechanism of injury can influence the likelihood of specific types of intracranial pathology.

Pathophysiology of Closed Head Injury

Cerebral blood flow (CBF), while challenging to measure directly, is critically determined by cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). CPP is calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP): CPP = MAP – ICP. ICP is itself influenced by the volumes of blood, brain tissue (parenchyma), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the rigid cranial space. The Monro-Kellie doctrine explains that an increase in volume in any of these compartments must be compensated by a decrease in another to maintain a stable ICP. Head injuries can disrupt this balance, leading to elevated ICP. If ICP rises excessively and approaches MAP, CPP drops to dangerously low levels, potentially causing brain ischemia and further injury. The body’s compensatory mechanisms, such as increasing MAP and dilating cerebral blood vessels, can paradoxically worsen ICP, creating a detrimental cycle.

The consequences of CHI are categorized into primary and secondary brain injuries. Primary brain injury refers to the immediate structural damage at the moment of impact, including contusions, hematomas, diffuse axonal injury (DAI), direct cellular damage, neurochemical and electrochemical dysfunction, and blood-brain barrier disruption. Secondary brain injury develops over time due to the release of neurotransmitters, inflammatory mediators, and apoptotic processes, exacerbating the initial damage. It is crucial to differentiate secondary brain injury from secondary insults, such as hypoxia and hypotension, which are systemic conditions that can worsen brain damage and outcomes. Cerebral edema, both intracellular (cytotoxic) and extracellular, is a significant complication that can impair cerebral perfusion and contribute to fatal outcomes. Understanding these pathophysiological processes is essential for a nuanced head trauma differential diagnosis, as different injury mechanisms and secondary insults can lead to varied clinical presentations and require tailored management strategies.

History and Physical Examination in Head Trauma

In many cases, patients with CHI are victims of multisystem trauma, necessitating adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols. Obtaining a detailed history is crucial and should involve EMS personnel, the patient (if coherent), family members, and witnesses. Key historical information includes the mechanism of injury, any observed focal neurological deficits, seizures, vomiting, and changes in consciousness since the injury. It is also vital to inquire about intoxication, use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications, and pre-existing medical conditions. This comprehensive history is indispensable in narrowing down the head trauma differential diagnosis.

A critical component of both history and physical examination is the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) assessment, which should be monitored throughout the patient’s hospital stay. GCS evaluates eye-opening, verbal response, and motor response on a scale of 1 to 15. During the physical exam, particularly in patients with coma or altered mental status, a single fixed and dilated pupil raises suspicion for uncal herniation. Bilateral fixed and dilated pupils may indicate severely elevated ICP, poor cerebral perfusion, bilateral uncal herniation, or hypoxemia. Assessing motor function by evaluating limb movement in response to commands or noxious stimuli is essential. Decorticate posturing (flexion of upper extremities and extension of lower extremities) suggests severe injury above the midbrain, while decerebrate posturing (extension and internal rotation of both upper and lower extremities) indicates a more caudal brain injury. Brainstem reflexes, such as respiratory pattern, pupillary reflex, corneal reflex, cough, and gag reflex, are valuable for diagnosis and prognostication in comatose patients.

Frequent repeat physical examinations are necessary, as changes can signal increasing ICP or impending herniation. Signs and symptoms of elevated ICP include systolic hypertension, bradycardia, and irregular respirations (Cushing’s triad), severe headache, vision disturbances, nausea, vomiting, lethargy, focal weakness or paresthesias, and coma. Indicators of impending brain shift or herniation may include progressive neurological deterioration, unilateral or bilateral pupillary dilation, hemiparesis, or abnormal posturing. A thorough and serial neurological examination is fundamental in guiding the head trauma differential diagnosis and subsequent management decisions.

Evaluation and Diagnostic Modalities for Head Trauma

Computed tomography (CT) scanning is highly sensitive in detecting acute intracranial hemorrhage and is the primary imaging modality for patients with suspected serious traumatic brain injury. CT scans should be obtained as rapidly as possible. To avoid unnecessary CT scans, clinical decision rules such as the Canadian Head CT Rule and the New Orleans Criteria are used in adults to identify patients requiring neurosurgical intervention. These rules are highly sensitive for clinically significant traumatic intracranial injuries, although the Canadian Head CT Rule demonstrates greater specificity. It’s important to note that these rules generally exclude patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications. For patients under 18 years, the PECARN Pediatric Head Injury/Trauma Algorithm is the commonly used tool, also exhibiting near 100% sensitivity for clinically significant intracranial injuries. Cervical spine imaging should also be strongly considered, especially in comatose patients, as concomitant cervical spine injury is common in head trauma.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect subtle lesions not visible on CT or further characterize lesions identified on CT. However, due to its limited availability in acute settings and lack of proven significant value in the early evaluation of acute CHI, MRI is not routinely part of the initial assessment. MRI may provide more detailed information in cases of chronic hemorrhage or for assessing diffuse axonal injury in the subacute phase. While CT is crucial for the acute head trauma differential diagnosis, MRI may play a complementary role in specific situations and for longer-term assessment.

Treatment and Management Strategies for Head Trauma

Initial management of CHI focuses on the ABCs – Airway, Breathing, and Circulation – with the primary goals of maintaining cerebral perfusion and oxygenation.

Airway Management: Patients with a GCS score of 8 or less typically require intubation, as may those who are agitated and impede necessary treatment. Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is the preferred method, using induction agents like etomidate, which has minimal impact on blood pressure or ICP. While ketamine’s effect on ICP has been debated, recent evidence suggests it is safe for RSI in TBI. Succinylcholine and rocuronium are effective paralytic agents; succinylcholine offers faster resolution of neuromuscular blockade. Pretreatment with lidocaine or fentanyl was historically recommended, but evidence supporting their benefit on patient outcomes is limited. Nasotracheal intubation should be avoided if facial trauma or basilar skull fracture is suspected. In-line cervical spine stabilization must be maintained throughout intubation.

Breathing and Ventilation: The goal is to achieve normoxia and normocarbia, with target oxygen saturation above 90%, PaO2 greater than 60 mm Hg, and PaCO2 between 35 to 45 mm Hg. Hypoxemia significantly increases mortality, and prolonged hypocapnia can cause cerebral vasoconstriction and ischemia.

Circulation and Blood Pressure Management: Maintaining adequate CPP is paramount. As CPP = MAP – ICP, optimal CPP is achieved with a high MAP and low ICP. Although isolated head trauma is unlikely to cause hypotension, hypotension may occur due to associated polytrauma, scalp lacerations, or subgaleal hematomas, particularly in children. Hypotension can lead to brain ischemia and edema, necessitating aggressive fluid resuscitation to maintain systolic blood pressure at ≥100 mm Hg for patients aged 50 to 69 years, and ≥110 mm Hg for patients aged 15 to 49 years or older than 70 years.

Positioning: Elevating the head of the bed to 30 degrees is recommended, especially when increased ICP is suspected, although definitive evidence of its benefit is still emerging.

Glucose Control: Hyperglycemia should be avoided in moderate to severe TBI. Insulin infusion may be necessary to maintain blood glucose levels between 100-180 mg/dL.

Temperature Management: Fever increases cerebral metabolic demand and ICP, thus aggressive fever management to achieve normothermia is essential. Therapeutic hypothermia is currently not recommended for routine TBI management.

Seizure Management: Seizures are common after CHI and can worsen secondary injury. Acute seizures should be treated with benzodiazepines. Seizure prophylaxis is considered in patients with GCS ≤ 10 or those with cortical contusions, depressed skull fractures, subdural hematomas, epidural hematomas, or penetrating head injuries.

Management of Elevated ICP and Herniation: Early neurosurgical consultation is crucial for moderate to severe TBI. Neurosurgery will guide surgical interventions and ICP monitoring using devices like intracranial bolts or external ventricular drains (EVDs). Sustained ICP above 20 mmHg is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The Brain Trauma Foundation recommends invasive ICP monitoring for: 1) Moderate to severe TBI in patients whose neurological examination is unreliable (e.g., intubated); 2) Severe head injury with abnormal CT scan; 3) Severe head injury with normal CT if two or more of the following are present: age >40 years, systolic BP <90 mmHg, or abnormal motor posturing. These comprehensive treatment strategies are vital in managing CHI and should be considered alongside the head trauma differential diagnosis to optimize patient care.

Head Trauma Differential Diagnosis

When evaluating a patient with suspected head trauma, it is critical to consider a broad differential diagnosis. The initial presentation of altered mental status after head injury can be mimicked by various medical conditions. Conditions that can cause falls and subsequent head injuries, or present similarly to CHI, must be considered. These include:

• Metabolic and Toxicological Causes:

  • Hypoglycemia: Low blood sugar can cause confusion, altered consciousness, and even seizures, mimicking TBI symptoms.
  • Electrolyte Imbalances: Severe sodium, calcium, or magnesium derangements can lead to neurological dysfunction.
  • Toxic Ingestions: Alcohol, illicit drugs, and certain medications can cause altered mental status and ataxia, increasing the risk of falls and mimicking TBI.
  • Hepatic or Renal Encephalopathy: Metabolic disturbances from liver or kidney failure can present with confusion and lethargy.

• Cardiovascular Events:

  • Syncope: Fainting spells from various causes (cardiac, vasovagal) can lead to falls and head trauma.
  • Cardiac Dysrhythmias: Irregular heart rhythms can reduce cerebral perfusion, causing syncope and potential head injury.
  • Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction: Cardiac events can present with atypical symptoms, including falls and altered mental status, especially in the elderly.
  • Stroke (Ischemic or Hemorrhagic): While stroke is a primary neurological event, it can sometimes be mistaken for TBI, particularly if the onset is unwitnessed and a fall occurred.

• Neurological Conditions:

  • Seizures (Postictal State): Seizures can cause falls and head trauma. The postictal state can present with confusion and altered consciousness, similar to TBI.
  • Migraine Headaches: Severe migraines can cause neurological symptoms that might be confused with mild TBI, although typically without a history of trauma.

• Infections:

  • Meningitis and Encephalitis: These central nervous system infections can cause fever, altered mental status, and seizures, which may be initially misdiagnosed as TBI if the history of trauma is prominent.
  • Sepsis: Systemic infection can lead to altered mental status and increase the risk of falls, potentially leading to head injury.

• Other Conditions:

  • Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH): This condition, often seen in older adults, can cause gait disturbances and cognitive decline, increasing fall risk and potentially mimicking chronic TBI effects.
  • Psychiatric Conditions: Certain psychiatric conditions may present with altered behavior or self-harm, leading to head injury and requiring differentiation from primary TBI.

It is also crucial to maintain a high index of suspicion for concurrent injuries, including orbital, maxillofacial, and skull trauma, which often accompany CHI. A thorough head trauma differential diagnosis requires careful consideration of these alternative and co-existing conditions to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

Prognosis of Closed Head Injury

Prognosis in CHI varies widely depending on the severity of the injury, patient age, and comorbidities. The 2008 MRC CRASH study, a large-scale study of over 10,000 TBI patients, provided valuable prognostic models. Factors like GCS score, age, pupillary response, and CT findings are critical in predicting outcomes.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), or concussion, generally has a favorable prognosis. Adults and children under 8 years typically recover quickly, with 85% to 90% recovering within 14 days. Adolescents and teenage males usually recover in about 4 weeks, while teenage females may take longer. Contrary to older beliefs, recent evidence indicates that early, graded exercise can facilitate quicker recovery from mTBI.

For moderate to severe TBI, outcomes exist on a spectrum from good recovery (resumption of normal life with minor deficits) to moderate disability (ability to work in a sheltered environment) to severe disability (dependence for daily activities) to persistent vegetative state, and ultimately, death. Long-term neurological and cognitive sequelae are common in moderate to severe TBI, emphasizing the need for comprehensive rehabilitation and long-term follow-up.

Complications of Closed Head Injury

Complications following moderate to severe TBI are significant and contribute to long-term morbidity. These include:

• Post-traumatic Epilepsy: Seizures are a recognized complication, particularly in the first week after injury and in the longer term.
• Spasticity: Muscle stiffness and spasms can develop, affecting mobility and function.
• Hydrocephalus: Disruption of CSF flow can lead to hydrocephalus, requiring surgical intervention.
• Cognitive Impairment: Deficits in memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed are common.
• Neurobehavioral Disorders: Changes in personality, mood disorders (depression, anxiety, PTSD), and behavioral problems can occur.
• Endocrine Dysfunction: Hypopituitarism and other endocrine issues can arise from damage to the pituitary gland or hypothalamus.
• Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE): Immobility increases the risk of thromboembolic events.
• Infections: Pneumonia and urinary tract infections are common, especially in patients requiring prolonged hospitalization.

For mild TBI, potential sequelae include post-concussive syndrome (PCS), thought to occur in up to 80% of patients, second impact syndrome (a rare but devastating condition causing rapid cerebral edema), post-traumatic epilepsy, and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), the risk of which increases with repeated concussions. Understanding these potential complications is crucial for comprehensive patient management and long-term care planning following head trauma.

Deterrence and Patient Education for Head Trauma

Prevention is the most effective strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality from CHI. Public health measures and patient education are critical. Key prevention strategies include:

• Seatbelt Use: Consistent seatbelt use significantly reduces the risk of head injury in motor vehicle accidents.
• Child Safety Seats and Booster Seats: Proper use of age and size-appropriate car seats and booster seats is essential for child passenger safety.
• Avoidance of Driving Under the Influence: Strict avoidance of alcohol and drug use while driving is paramount.
• Helmet Use: Helmets should be worn during activities involving open, unrestrained vehicles (motorcycles, bicycles, scooters) and during sports with a risk of head injury (football, hockey, skiing, snowboarding).
• Fall Prevention in Elderly: Implementing fall prevention strategies in older adults, such as home safety modifications and balance training, is crucial.
• Window Safety: Securing windows and balconies to prevent falls in children is important.

For patients with mild TBI, providing simple educational materials about return to activity and work/school has been shown to effectively reduce persistent symptoms. Numerous online resources are available for patient education on concussion and head injury recovery.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes in Head Trauma Management

Severe TBI is a progressive and complex condition with high morbidity and mortality, necessitating well-coordinated, interprofessional care. Hospitals should implement protocols for the initial and ongoing evaluation and management of TBI patients. These protocols should involve physicians, nurses, and staff from emergency medicine, trauma surgery, neurosurgery, and neurology. Pharmacists, case managers, social workers, physical and occupational therapists, and ethics committees also play vital roles in both inpatient and outpatient care and should be integrated into treatment and care planning early in the patient’s course. Effective communication, collaborative decision-making, and standardized care pathways are essential to optimize outcomes for patients with CHI and to navigate the complexities of head trauma differential diagnosis and management.

Review Questions

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

References

1.Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI., Demographics and Clinical Assessment Working Group of the International and Interagency Initiative toward Common Data Elements for Research on Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1637-40. [PubMed: 21044706]

2.Rutland-Brown W, Langlois JA, Thomas KE, Xi YL. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6):544-8. [PubMed: 17122685]

3.Coronado VG, Xu L, Basavaraju SV, McGuire LC, Wald MM, Faul MD, Guzman BR, Hemphill JD., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surveillance for traumatic brain injury-related deaths–United States, 1997-2007. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 May 06;60(5):1-32. [PubMed: 21544045]

4.Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths – United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16. [PMC free article: PMC5829835] [PubMed: 28301451]

5.Werner C, Engelhard K. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jul;99(1):4-9. [PubMed: 17573392]

6.McIntosh TK, Smith DH, Meaney DF, Kotapka MJ, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI. Neuropathological sequelae of traumatic brain injury: relationship to neurochemical and biomechanical mechanisms. Lab Invest. 1996 Feb;74(2):315-42. [PubMed: 8780153]

7.Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma. 1993 Feb;34(2):216-22. [PubMed: 8459458]

8.Marmarou A. A review of progress in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of brain edema. Neurosurg Focus. 2007 May 15;22(5):E1. [PubMed: 17613227]

9.Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Clement C, Lesiuk H, Laupacis A, McKnight RD, Verbeek R, Brison R, Cass D, Eisenhauer ME, Greenberg G, Worthington J. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001 May 05;357(9266):1391-6. [PubMed: 11356436]

10.Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 13;343(2):100-5. [PubMed: 10891517]

11.Stein SC, Fabbri A, Servadei F, Glick HA. A critical comparison of clinical decision instruments for computed tomographic scanning in mild closed traumatic brain injury in adolescents and adults. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;53(2):180-8. [PubMed: 18339447]

12.Robinson N, Clancy M. In patients with head injury undergoing rapid sequence intubation, does pretreatment with intravenous lignocaine/lidocaine lead to an improved neurological outcome? A review of the literature. Emerg Med J. 2001 Nov;18(6):453-7. [PMC free article: PMC1725712] [PubMed: 11696494]

13.Cork RC, Weiss JL, Hameroff SR, Bentley J. Fentanyl preloading for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1984 Jan;63(1):60-4. [PubMed: 6318605]

14.Chesnut RM, Marshall SB, Piek J, Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Marshall LF. Early and late systemic hypotension as a frequent and fundamental source of cerebral ischemia following severe brain injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1993;59:121-5. [PubMed: 8310858]

15.Manley G, Knudson MM, Morabito D, Damron S, Erickson V, Pitts L. Hypotension, hypoxia, and head injury: frequency, duration, and consequences. Arch Surg. 2001 Oct;136(10):1118-23. [PubMed: 11585502]

16.Berry C, Ley EJ, Bukur M, Malinoski D, Margulies DR, Mirocha J, Salim A. Redefining hypotension in traumatic brain injury. Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1833-7. [PubMed: 21939970]

17.Butcher I, Maas AI, Lu J, Marmarou A, Murray GD, Mushkudiani NA, McHugh GS, Steyerberg EW. Prognostic value of admission blood pressure in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):294-302. [PubMed: 17375994]

18.Tasker RC. Intracranial pressure: influence of head-of-bed elevation, and beyond. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;13(1):116-7. [PubMed: 22222657]

19.Coester A, Neumann CR, Schmidt MI. Intensive insulin therapy in severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):904-11. [PubMed: 20032790]

20.Silbergleit R, Lowenstein D, Durkalski V, Conwit R., Neurological Emergency Treatment Trials (NETT) Investigators. RAMPART (Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial): a double-blind randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of intramuscular midazolam versus intravenous lorazepam in the prehospital treatment of status epilepticus by paramedics. Epilepsia. 2011 Oct;52 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):45-7. [PMC free article: PMC3211107] [PubMed: 21967361]

21.Bansal S, Blalock D, Kebede T, Dean NP, Carpenter JL. Levetiracetam versus (fos)phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in pediatric patients with intracranial hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Feb;13(2):209-15. [PubMed: 24286154]

22.Talving P, Karamanos E, Teixeira PG, Skiada D, Lam L, Belzberg H, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe head injury: compliance with Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and effect on outcomes: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1248-54. [PubMed: 23971954]

23.MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators. Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, Poccock S, Roberts I, Shakur H, Steyerberg E, Yutthakasemsunt S. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):425-9. [PMC free article: PMC2249681] [PubMed: 18270239]

24.Nichol AD, Toal F, Fedi M, Cooper DJ. Early outcome prediction after severe traumatic brain injury: can multimodal magnetic resonance imaging assist in clinical prognostication for individual patients? Crit Care Resusc. 2011 Mar;13(1):5-8. [PubMed: 21355822]

25.Stevens RD, Sutter R. Prognosis in severe brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):1104-23. [PubMed: 23528755]

26.Levin HS, Diaz-Arrastia RR. Diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of mild traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol. 2015 May;14(5):506-17. [PubMed: 25801547]

27.Grool AM, Aglipay M, Momoli F, Meehan WP, Freedman SB, Yeates KO, Gravel J, Gagnon I, Boutis K, Meeuwisse W, Barrowman N, Ledoux AA, Osmond MH, Zemek R., Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) Concussion Team. Association Between Early Participation in Physical Activity Following Acute Concussion and Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms in Children and Adolescents. JAMA. 2016 Dec 20;316(23):2504-2514. [PubMed: 27997652]