Introduction
Shoulder pain is a widespread issue, prompting numerous visits to primary care physicians and orthopedic specialists globally. Estimates suggest that shoulder problems affect 7% to 34% of the population, with shoulder impingement syndrome frequently identified as the root cause.[1] Since its initial description in 1852, shoulder impingement syndrome has been recognized as the most prevalent source of shoulder discomfort, accounting for 44% to 65% of all shoulder-related complaints.[2] In the UK, among the 20% to 50% of individuals seeking medical advice for shoulder pain from general practitioners, approximately 25% receive a diagnosis of shoulder impingement syndrome. Adding to the challenge, shoulder pain is often chronic or recurrent, with 54% of sufferers reporting persistent symptoms even after three years.[3] Accurate Impingement Syndrome Diagnosis is therefore crucial for effective management and patient care. This article provides an in-depth guide to impingement syndrome diagnosis, building upon existing knowledge and tailored for experts in fields requiring musculoskeletal understanding, such as automotive repair.
Etiology of Shoulder Impingement
It’s essential to distinguish between external and internal shoulder impingement, primarily differentiated by the rotator cuff’s anatomical role as a boundary. Internal impingement typically arises from repetitive overhead motions common in athletes and manual laborers. This form involves articular-sided rotator cuff pathology, glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), and superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears.[4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
External impingement, often simply referred to as shoulder impingement, is a painful condition stemming from inflammation, irritation, and degeneration within the subacromial space.[2, 9] Historically viewed as a singular diagnosis, shoulder impingement syndrome is now understood as a collection of symptoms and anatomical features.[10] A precise impingement syndrome diagnosis requires understanding these nuances.
The subacromial space is defined by the acromion and coracoacromial ligament anteriorly, the acromioclavicular (AC) joint superiorly, and the humeral head inferiorly.[2] The acromion’s shape is considered a factor in external, or “outlet-based,” impingement. Bigliani and Morrison’s classification categorizes acromion shapes into three types:[6]
- Type I: Flat acromion
- Type II: Curved acromion
- Type III: Hooked acromion
Normal shoulder movements, such as abduction, forward flexion, and internal rotation, naturally narrow the subacromial space, which typically measures 1.0 to 1.5 cm in width. This narrowing occurs as the humeral head migrates superiorly, approaching the acromion’s anteroinferior edge.[11] Pain in shoulder impingement arises from the humeral head compressing the rotator cuff, subacromial bursa, or both during these movements.[2] Therefore, understanding shoulder biomechanics is key to accurate impingement syndrome diagnosis.
While repetitive compression and degeneration of rotator cuff tendons contribute to subacromial space narrowing, the causal relationship—whether damaged tendons cause impingement or vice versa—remains unclear.[2] The process of impingement syndrome diagnosis must consider both possibilities.
Shoulder impingement is classified by location (external or internal) and underlying cause (primary or secondary).[10, 12, 13] External, or subacromial, impingement results from mechanical obstruction of soft tissues in the subacromial space. Internal impingement occurs when rotator cuff tendons are compressed between the humeral head and glenoid rim, commonly affecting the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons.[10] Differentiating between these types is crucial for a correct impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Primary impingement involves structural narrowing of the subacromial space due to factors like a hooked type III acromion or soft tissue swelling. Secondary impingement, however, occurs despite normal resting anatomy. It develops during shoulder motion, often due to rotator cuff weakness causing uncontrolled upward movement of the humeral head.[10, 12, 13] Weakness in the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles can also contribute to secondary impingement by limiting scapular rotation and elevation during arm abduction, further narrowing the subacromial space.[2] Thus, a comprehensive impingement syndrome diagnosis must assess both structural and functional factors.
Neer categorized shoulder impingement into three stages of severity. Stage I involves edema and hemorrhage, often from overuse. Stage II features fibrosis and irreversible tendon changes. Stage III, resulting from chronic fibrosis, may involve tendon rupture or tear.[14, 15] Staging is important in guiding treatment following impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Epidemiology of Shoulder Impingement
Shoulder impingement syndrome is prevalent among individuals involved in sports and occupations requiring repetitive overhead activities, such as handball, volleyball, swimming, carpentry, painting, and hairdressing.[4] Extrinsic risk factors include heavy lifting, infection, smoking, and fluoroquinolone antibiotics.[2] The incidence of shoulder impingement increases with age, peaking in the sixth decade of life.[12] These epidemiological factors can aid in initial risk assessment during impingement syndrome diagnosis.
History and Physical Examination in Impingement Syndrome Diagnosis
A thorough history and physical exam are fundamental to impingement syndrome diagnosis. Patients often report pain when lifting their arm or lying on the affected side. They may present with limited motion or nighttime pain disrupting sleep. Weakness and stiffness often accompany the pain.[16] Onset is usually gradual, developing over weeks or months, often without a specific injury.[12, 17] Pain is typically located over the lateral acromion, radiating down the lateral mid-humerus. Clinicians should inquire about pain characteristics (onset, quality, exacerbating/remitting factors), prior interventions, clinical response, and injury history. Crucially, detailed questioning about overhead and repetitive activities is necessary. Rest, anti-inflammatory medications, and ice may provide temporary relief, but symptoms often return with activity. This detailed history is a cornerstone of impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Physical examination should include inspection, palpation, passive and active range of motion, and strength testing of the neck and shoulder, comparing bilaterally. Weakness in abduction and/or external rotation is common on the affected side.[10, 12] Scapular dyskinesis may be observed during arm elevation. Tenderness to palpation is often present over the coracoid process. These physical findings contribute significantly to impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Special tests are critical components of the physical exam.[8] Tests specific to shoulder impingement include the Hawkins test, Neer sign, Jobe test, and painful arc of motion. Individually, these tests have limited sensitivity and specificity, but combined, they strengthen the impingement syndrome diagnosis.[10]
- Hawkins Test: Performed by passively internally rotating the patient’s arm at 90 degrees of shoulder forward flexion and elbow flexion. Acromial pain suggests subacromial impingement, but it may be negative in internal impingement.[10]
- Neer Sign: With the scapula stabilized, the examiner maximally forward flexes the patient’s arm (passive range of motion). Anterior shoulder pain suggests subacromial impingement, while posterior pain suggests internal impingement.
- Jobe Test (Empty Can Test): Patient’s arms are abducted to 90 degrees in the scapular plane, maximally internally rotated, and resistance is applied against further abduction. Localized pain indicates a positive test.[10]
- Painful Arc of Motion: Pain experienced during arm abduction between 70 and 120 degrees and forced overhead movement.[12]
Tests for shoulder instability, such as the sulcus sign, anterior apprehension, and relocation tests, are typically negative in shoulder impingement syndrome. These differential tests help refine the impingement syndrome diagnosis.
- Sulcus Sign: With the patient sitting, the clinician stabilizes the shoulder and applies an inferior force at the elbow. Inferior humeral head displacement indicates a positive test.[18]
- Anterior Apprehension Test: Patient supine, shoulder abducted and externally rotated to 90 degrees. Gentle external rotation is applied while supporting the proximal shoulder. A feeling of impending subluxation is a positive test.[18]
- Relocation Test: Following a positive anterior apprehension test, posterior force applied to the anterior humeral head relieves symptoms, indicating instability.[18]
Evaluation and Diagnostic Imaging for Impingement Syndrome
While physical examination sensitivity for impingement syndrome diagnosis can reach 90%, imaging studies often confirm the diagnosis and exclude other conditions.[12] Radiographs, if obtained, should be bilateral to compare anatomy and rule out conditions like calcific tendinitis or arthritis. Advanced imaging is often considered when physical examination findings are inconclusive for impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Standard shoulder radiographs include AP and lateral/scapular Y views. The AP view assesses the critical shoulder angle (CSA), reflecting acromial coverage and glenoid inclination. CSAs over 35 degrees increase the likelihood of rotator cuff involvement in impingement. Acromiohumeral distance (AHD), measured from the acromion’s inferior edge to the humeral head (normal range 7-14 mm in men, 7-12 mm in women), can also indicate rotator cuff pathology; a reduced AHD suggests pathology. The scapular Y view assesses humeral head positioning on the glenoid. Outlet views best visualize acromion shape, aiding in impingement syndrome diagnosis related to structural factors.[12]
Ultrasound and MRI are other imaging modalities. MRI, recommended if no improvement after 6 weeks of therapy,[19] provides detailed views of bony and soft tissues. Ultrasound is a bedside option for assessing soft tissue factors like bursitis, tendinopathy, and tendon ruptures.[12, 20] These imaging techniques play a supportive role in confirming impingement syndrome diagnosis and ruling out differentials.
Treatment and Management Following Impingement Syndrome Diagnosis
The cornerstone of shoulder impingement syndrome management, following impingement syndrome diagnosis, is rehabilitative exercise, with surgery considered if conservative approaches fail or structural issues are present. For cases without structural damage, non-operative treatments—controlled exercise, NSAIDs, and subacromial injections—are preferred for the initial 3 to 6 months.[2]
Exercise therapy has shown better outcomes than placebo in the sub-acute phase.[21] Physiotherapy should focus on rotator cuff strengthening (supraspinatus and infraspinatus), trapezius and serratus anterior strengthening to correct scapular dyskinesis, and exercises addressing upper extremity strength imbalances. Combining exercise with other conservative therapies improves pain scores compared to monotherapy. Physiotherapy plus localized injections maximizes treatment effect compared to injections alone.[15] Hyperthermia may also provide short-term symptom relief when added to physical therapy.[21] These conservative measures are typically initiated following impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Corticosteroid injections, often administered via a posterior subacromial approach, utilize a 1.5-inch, 21 or 22-gauge needle with lidocaine and corticosteroid. The posterior shoulder portal (1 cm medial and inferior to the acromion’s posterior corner) is the entry point, with the needle directed anterosuperiorly towards the acromion’s underside. Easy, resistance-free injection is desired; resistance suggests tendon injection, requiring redirection. While landmark-based injections offer benefit, ultrasound-guided injections may provide superior symptom relief.[23] Injections are a common component of management after impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Systematic reviews comparing surgery versus conservative therapy indicate moderate evidence that surgery is not more effective than physical therapy for pain reduction in impingement.[24] Arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD), involving acromioplasty, bursal debridement, and coracoacromial ligament resection,[2] is considered for severe, persistent pain and functional limitations unresponsive to conservative treatment.[1, 12, 17] Combined ASD with radiofrequency ablation and arthroscopic bursectomy shows more benefit than open subacromial decompression (OSD) plus platelet-leukocyte gel injection.[15] However, a 2018 review found no additional pain reduction benefit from ASD compared to placebo surgery at 12 months.[25] Other surgical options like acromioplasty or bursectomy alone also appear to offer minimal benefit.[26] The decision for surgical intervention is made when conservative approaches fail after accurate impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Comparing surgery plus physiotherapy to surgery alone reveals no significant differences in pain at 3 months, 6 months, 5 years, and 10 years, or function at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up.[1] This highlights the important role of physiotherapy in managing symptoms after impingement syndrome diagnosis, regardless of surgical intervention.
Differential Diagnosis in Impingement Syndrome
The differential diagnosis for shoulder impingement syndrome is broad and includes:
- Adhesive capsulitis
- Rotator cuff tear
- Acromioclavicular joint arthritis
- Acromioclavicular joint sprain
- Trapezius muscle spasm
- Biceps tendonitis
- Biceps tendon rupture
- Calcific tendonitis
- Glenohumeral arthritis
- Distal clavicle osteolysis
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Thoracic outlet syndrome
A thorough evaluation is crucial to differentiate these conditions from shoulder impingement and ensure accurate impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Prognosis of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
With conservative therapy (physical therapy, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections), 60% of patients experience satisfactory outcomes within two years.[2, 12] This generally positive prognosis underscores the importance of early and accurate impingement syndrome diagnosis to initiate timely and effective management.
Complications of Untreated Impingement Syndrome
Complications from shoulder impingement syndrome primarily arise from structural damage in the subacromial space, altered biomechanics, or disuse atrophy. Potential complications include rotator cuff tendonitis or tear, bicipital tendonitis or tear, or adhesive capsulitis. Early impingement syndrome diagnosis and management can help prevent these complications.
Deterrence and Patient Education Following Diagnosis
Patient education should emphasize adherence to physical therapy and home exercise programs, as well as activity modifications, such as avoiding overhead activities until pain improves. Lifestyle modifications, like limiting movements to a comfortable anterior zone and minimizing overhead or behind-the-back reaching, are beneficial.[12, 17] Post-impingement syndrome diagnosis, patient education is crucial for successful management.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes in Impingement Syndrome Management
Effective management of shoulder impingement syndrome relies on interprofessional healthcare collaboration. This involves primary care clinicians providing pain relief (NSAIDs, injections) and referrals to physiotherapy. Physical therapists lead exercise programs in-office and at home. Regular communication between physical therapists and primary care clinicians guides further imaging and treatment. Orthopedic surgeons are consulted for surgical candidates. Orthopedic nurses support assessment, patient education, and communication with orthopedists. [Level 5] This interprofessional approach is vital for optimal patient outcomes after impingement syndrome diagnosis.
References
1.Nazari G, MacDermid JC, Bryant D, Athwal GS. The effectiveness of surgical vs conservative interventions on pain and function in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216961.
2.Consigliere P, Haddo O, Levy O, Sforza G. Subacromial impingement syndrome: management challenges. Orthop Res Rev. 2018;10:83-91.
3.Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Br J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;43(4):259-64.
4.Davis DD, Nickerson M, Varacallo M. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Nov 22, 2023. Swimmer’s Shoulder.
5.Varacallo M, Tapscott DC, Mair SD. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 4, 2023. Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Lesions.
6.Varacallo M, El Bitar Y, Sina RE, Mair SD. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Mar 5, 2024. Rotator Cuff Syndrome.
7.Miniato MA, Anand P, Varacallo M. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jul 24, 2023. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Shoulder.
8.Varacallo M, El Bitar Y, Mair SD. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 4, 2023. Comprehensive Shoulder Evaluation Strategies.
9.Varacallo M, El Bitar Y, Mair SD. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 4, 2023. Rotator Cuff Tendonitis.
10.Cools AM, Cambier D, Witvrouw EE. Screening the athlete’s shoulder for impingement symptoms: a clinical reasoning algorithm for early detection of shoulder pathology. Br J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;42(8):628-35.
11.Maruvada S, Madrazo-Ibarra A, Varacallo M. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Mar 27, 2023. Anatomy, Rotator Cuff.
12.Garving C, Jakob S, Bauer I, Nadjar R, Brunner UH. Impingement Syndrome of the Shoulder. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Nov 10;114(45):765-776.
13.Ellenbecker TS, Cools A. Rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff injuries: an evidence-based review. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;44(5):319-27.
14.Tsai YH, Huang TJ, Hsu WH, Huang KC, Li YY, Peng KT, Hsu RW. Detection of subacromial bursa thickening by sonography in shoulder impingement syndrome. Chang Gung Med J. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):135-41.
15.Dong W, Goost H, Lin XB, Burger C, Paul C, Wang ZL, Zhang TY, Jiang ZC, Welle K, Kabir K. Treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome: a PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(10):e510.
16.Dhillon KS. Subacromial Impingement Syndrome of the Shoulder: A Musculoskeletal Disorder or a Medical Myth? Malays Orthop J. 2019 Nov;13(3):1-7.
17.Koester MC, George MS, Kuhn JE. Shoulder impingement syndrome. Am J Med. 2005 May;118(5):452-5.
18.Lizzio VA, Meta F, Fidai M, Makhni EC. Clinical Evaluation and Physical Exam Findings in Patients with Anterior Shoulder Instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):434-441.
19.Jaggi A, Lambert S. Rehabilitation for shoulder instability. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;44(5):333-40.
20.Kadi R, Milants A, Shahabpour M. Shoulder Anatomy and Normal Variants. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2017 Dec 16;101(Suppl 2):3.
21.Gebremariam L, Hay EM, van der Sande R, Rinkel WD, Koes BW, Huisstede BM. Subacromial impingement syndrome–effectiveness of physiotherapy and manual therapy. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;48(16):1202-8.
22.Shang X, Zhang Z, Pan X, Li J, Li Q. Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1274790.
23.Daniels EW, Cole D, Jacobs B, Phillips SF. Existing Evidence on Ultrasound-Guided Injections in Sports Medicine. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;6(2):2325967118756576.
24.Saltychev M, Äärimaa V, Virolainen P, Laimi K. Conservative treatment or surgery for shoulder impingement: systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(1):1-8.
25.Lähdeoja T, Karjalainen T, Jokihaara J, Salamh P, Kavaja L, Agarwal A, Winters M, Buchbinder R, Guyatt G, Vandvik PO, Ardern CL. Subacromial decompression surgery for adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):665-673.
26.Vandvik PO, Lähdeoja T, Ardern C, Buchbinder R, Moro J, Brox JI, Burgers J, Hao Q, Karjalainen T, van den Bekerom M, Noorduyn J, Lytvyn L, Siemieniuk RAC, Albin A, Shunjie SC, Fisch F, Proulx L, Guyatt G, Agoritsas T, Poolman RW. Subacromial decompression surgery for adults with shoulder pain: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2019 Feb 06;364:l294.
