Meckel’s diverticulum represents the most prevalent congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract, arising from the incomplete closure of the vitelline duct during embryonic development. While many individuals with Meckel’s diverticulum remain asymptomatic throughout their lives, it can manifest with significant clinical presentations, most notably painless rectal bleeding. Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial for effective management and to prevent potential complications. This article provides an in-depth exploration of Meckel’s diverticulum diagnosis, aiming to enhance the understanding and diagnostic acumen of healthcare professionals.
Understanding Meckel’s Diverticulum: Etiology and Pathophysiology
Meckel’s diverticulum originates from the incomplete obliteration of the omphalomesenteric duct, also known as the vitelline duct. This duct is essential during early fetal development, connecting the yolk sac to the developing gut, providing vital nutrients before the placenta is fully formed. Typically, the omphalomesenteric duct obliterates by the 7th week of gestation. However, when this process is incomplete, various remnants can persist, including Meckel’s diverticulum.
This diverticulum is located on the antimesenteric border of the ileum, typically within 2 feet (approximately 60 cm) of the ileocecal valve. It is characterized as a true diverticulum, encompassing all layers of the intestinal wall. A significant clinical aspect of Meckel’s diverticulum is the presence of ectopic tissue within its lining. Gastric mucosa is the most common type of ectopic tissue, found in approximately 60-85% of symptomatic cases. This ectopic gastric mucosa can secrete hydrochloric acid, leading to ulceration of the adjacent ileal mucosa and subsequent bleeding. Pancreatic tissue, colonic mucosa, and duodenal mucosa are less frequently found ectopic tissues.
Remembering the “rule of 2s” can be a helpful mnemonic for Meckel’s diverticulum:
- 2% of the population are affected.
- 2% of those affected become symptomatic.
- Symptoms typically manifest before the age of 2 years.
- Males are affected 2 times more often than females.
- Located within 2 feet of the ileocecal valve.
- Approximately 2 inches in length.
- May contain 2 types of ectopic mucosa (gastric and pancreatic being most common).
While the “rule of 2s” offers a convenient framework, it’s important to recognize that these are approximations and variations can occur.
Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Suspicion
A significant challenge in Meckel’s diverticulum is that most individuals remain asymptomatic. Diagnosis often occurs incidentally during imaging studies or surgery performed for unrelated reasons. However, when symptomatic, Meckel’s diverticulum can present with a range of clinical manifestations, primarily related to bleeding, obstruction, or inflammation.
Symptoms Suggestive of Meckel’s Diverticulum
- Painless Rectal Bleeding: This is the most classic symptom, particularly in children. The bleeding is often described as “currant jelly” stool due to the mixture of blood and mucus, or as bright red blood. In adults, melena (dark, tarry stools) may be more common. The bleeding arises from ulceration of the ileal mucosa adjacent to ectopic gastric tissue within the diverticulum.
- Abdominal Pain: While classically described as painless bleeding, abdominal pain can occur. This pain may be related to diverticulitis, obstruction, or intussusception.
- Small Bowel Obstruction: Meckel’s diverticulum can lead to bowel obstruction through various mechanisms, including:
- Volvulus: Twisting of the bowel around a fibrous band connecting the diverticulum to the umbilicus.
- Intussusception: The diverticulum can act as a lead point, causing telescoping of one part of the intestine into another.
- Herniation: Incarceration of the diverticulum within a hernia, such as a Littre’s hernia (inguinal hernia containing a Meckel’s diverticulum).
- Meckel’s Diverticulitis: Inflammation of the diverticulum, mimicking appendicitis, can occur. Perforation and peritonitis are potential complications of diverticulitis.
Patient History and Physical Examination in Diagnosis
A thorough history and physical examination are crucial initial steps in considering Meckel’s diverticulum in the differential diagnosis. Key historical points include:
- Age: Symptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum is more common in children, particularly those under 2 years old. However, it can present at any age.
- Presenting Symptom: Careful characterization of rectal bleeding (color, quantity, frequency), abdominal pain (location, character, duration), and any symptoms suggestive of bowel obstruction (vomiting, distention, constipation) is essential.
- Past Medical History: Inquire about previous abdominal surgeries, especially appendectomy (to consider Meckel’s diverticulitis in patients presenting with appendicitis-like symptoms post-appendectomy), and any history of gastrointestinal bleeding or anemia.
Physical examination findings may be non-specific, especially in cases of painless bleeding. However, abdominal tenderness, distention, or signs of peritonitis may be present in cases of diverticulitis, obstruction, or perforation. In infants and young children, careful examination for inguinal or umbilical hernias is important, as Littre’s hernia should be considered.
Diagnostic Modalities for Meckel’s Diverticulum
While clinical suspicion is vital, definitive diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum often relies on imaging and endoscopic techniques.
Meckel Scan (Technetium-99m Pertechnetate Scan)
The Meckel scan is the most sensitive and specific diagnostic test for Meckel’s diverticulum containing ectopic gastric mucosa. It utilizes technetium-99m pertechnetate, a radiopharmaceutical agent that is preferentially taken up by gastric mucosa.
How it works:
- Radiotracer Administration: Technetium-99m pertechnetate is injected intravenously.
- Uptake by Gastric Mucosa: The radiotracer is absorbed by gastric mucosa, including ectopic gastric mucosa within a Meckel’s diverticulum.
- Imaging: Abdominal images are acquired using a gamma camera over a period of time (typically 30-60 minutes).
- Interpretation: A positive Meckel scan shows focal uptake of the radiotracer in the right lower quadrant, corresponding to the location of a Meckel’s diverticulum with ectopic gastric mucosa.
Enhancing Scan Sensitivity:
- Pre-medication with H2 Receptor Antagonists (e.g., Cimetidine, Ranitidine): These medications inhibit gastric acid secretion, increasing the uptake of technetium-99m pertechnetate by the ectopic gastric mucosa and improving scan sensitivity.
- Glucagon: Glucagon can reduce bowel peristalsis, improving image quality.
Limitations of Meckel Scan:
- Ectopic Tissue Requirement: The Meckel scan is only positive if ectopic gastric mucosa is present in the diverticulum. If the diverticulum lacks gastric mucosa, or contains other types of ectopic tissue, the scan will be negative.
- False Negatives: False negative results can occur in neonates (due to low gastric mucosa secretion), in cases of small diverticula, or if there is minimal ectopic gastric mucosa.
- False Positives: False positive results can occur with other conditions that cause gastric mucosa in the abdomen, such as intussusception with gastric duplication cysts, inflammatory bowel disease, or ectopic gastric mucosa in other locations.
Despite these limitations, the Meckel scan remains the gold standard non-invasive diagnostic test, particularly in children presenting with painless rectal bleeding.
Tagged Red Blood Cell (RBC) Scan
In patients with active rectal bleeding, a tagged RBC scan can be useful to detect the site of bleeding, including bleeding from a Meckel’s diverticulum.
How it works:
- RBC Tagging: The patient’s red blood cells are labeled with technetium-99m.
- Re-injection: The tagged RBCs are reinjected into the patient.
- Imaging: Serial abdominal images are obtained to detect extravasation of the tagged RBCs into the bowel lumen, indicating the site of bleeding.
Limitations:
- Active Bleeding Required: A tagged RBC scan requires active bleeding at a rate of at least 0.1-0.5 mL/min to be detected. If bleeding is intermittent or has ceased, the scan may be negative.
- Non-Specific: While it can localize bleeding to a general area, it may not specifically identify Meckel’s diverticulum as the source, as bleeding could originate from other lesions in the small bowel or colon.
Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
CT scans are not the primary diagnostic modality for Meckel’s diverticulum, but they can be valuable in certain clinical scenarios, particularly when complications are suspected.
Diagnostic Utility in Meckel’s Diverticulum:
- Diverticulitis: CT can demonstrate inflammation in and around the diverticulum, thickening of the bowel wall, and mesenteric fat stranding, suggestive of Meckel’s diverticulitis.
- Obstruction: CT can identify signs of small bowel obstruction, such as dilated loops of bowel proximal to the obstruction and a transition point, which may be related to a Meckel’s diverticulum acting as a lead point for intussusception or volvulus.
- Alternative Diagnoses: CT can help rule out other causes of abdominal pain or bleeding, such as appendicitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or tumors.
Limitations:
- Low Sensitivity for Uncomplicated Meckel’s Diverticulum: CT is not sensitive for detecting uncomplicated, asymptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum.
- Radiation Exposure: CT involves ionizing radiation, which is a consideration, especially in children.
Mesenteric Angiography
Mesenteric angiography is an invasive procedure that is rarely used for the primary diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum but can be considered in cases of significant, ongoing gastrointestinal bleeding when other diagnostic modalities are inconclusive.
Diagnostic Utility:
- Active Bleeding Localization: Angiography can identify the site of active bleeding by demonstrating contrast extravasation into the bowel lumen.
- Anatomical Detail: In some cases, angiography may visualize an anomalous superior mesenteric artery branch supplying the Meckel’s diverticulum.
Limitations:
- Invasive Procedure: Angiography is an invasive procedure with potential risks, including arterial injury, bleeding, and contrast nephropathy.
- Active Bleeding Requirement: Similar to tagged RBC scan, angiography requires active bleeding at a rate of at least 0.5-1 mL/min to be detected.
- Often Bleeding Ceases Spontaneously: Bleeding from Meckel’s diverticulum often ceases spontaneously by the time angiography is performed, leading to negative results.
Endoscopy (Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy)
Endoscopic techniques, particularly capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy, can be used to visualize the small bowel and potentially diagnose Meckel’s diverticulum.
- Capsule Endoscopy: A small, disposable camera in a capsule is swallowed by the patient and transmits images of the small bowel as it passes through the digestive tract. Capsule endoscopy can visualize Meckel’s diverticulum and identify mucosal abnormalities, but it cannot obtain biopsies or perform therapeutic interventions.
- Double-Balloon Enteroscopy: This technique uses a specialized endoscope with two balloons to navigate deep into the small bowel. It allows for direct visualization of the Meckel’s diverticulum, biopsy, and potentially therapeutic interventions in some cases.
Limitations:
- Less Sensitive than Meckel Scan: Endoscopy is generally less sensitive than Meckel scan for detecting Meckel’s diverticulum, especially if ectopic gastric mucosa is not prominent or if the diverticulum is small and easily missed.
- Invasive (Double-Balloon Enteroscopy): Double-balloon enteroscopy is more invasive than capsule endoscopy and carries risks associated with endoscopy, such as perforation.
- Visualization Challenges: Visualizing the entire small bowel and specifically the Meckel’s diverticulum location can be challenging even with these advanced endoscopic techniques.
Diagnostic Algorithm and Approach
The diagnostic approach to Meckel’s diverticulum depends on the clinical presentation and the age of the patient.
In Children with Painless Rectal Bleeding:
- Meckel Scan: This is the initial test of choice due to its high sensitivity and specificity for detecting ectopic gastric mucosa.
- If Meckel Scan is Positive: Diagnosis is confirmed. Management typically involves surgical excision of the diverticulum.
- If Meckel Scan is Negative but Clinical Suspicion Remains High:
- Consider tagged RBC scan if active bleeding is ongoing to localize the bleeding site.
- Further investigation may include capsule endoscopy or double-balloon enteroscopy to visualize the small bowel mucosa directly.
- In rare cases, if diagnostic uncertainty persists and symptoms are severe or recurrent, exploratory laparoscopy or laparotomy may be considered.
In Adults with Suspected Meckel’s Diverticulum:
- The diagnostic approach is less well-defined in adults, as Meckel scan sensitivity may be lower, and differential diagnoses are broader.
- CT Scan: Often used initially to evaluate abdominal pain or obstruction and to rule out other conditions.
- Capsule Endoscopy or Double-Balloon Enteroscopy: May be considered to visualize the small bowel mucosa if bleeding is suspected or if other investigations are inconclusive.
- Angiography: Reserved for cases of significant, ongoing bleeding when other modalities are not diagnostic.
- Meckel Scan: Can be considered, particularly if ectopic gastric mucosa is suspected as the source of symptoms, but sensitivity may be lower than in children.
Incidental Finding of Meckel’s Diverticulum:
- When Meckel’s diverticulum is discovered incidentally during surgery for another condition, most surgeons recommend prophylactic removal, especially in children and younger adults, due to the lifetime risk of developing symptoms.
Differential Diagnoses
It is crucial to consider a wide range of differential diagnoses when evaluating patients with symptoms potentially related to Meckel’s diverticulum.
Differential diagnoses for painless rectal bleeding in children:
- Anal fissure
- Milk protein allergy
- Intussusception
- Infectious colitis
- Juvenile polyps
- Swallowed maternal blood
Differential diagnoses for abdominal pain and/or gastrointestinal bleeding in adults:
- Peptic ulcer disease
- Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis)
- Diverticulitis (colonic diverticulitis)
- Angiodysplasia
- Colorectal cancer
- Small bowel tumors
- Ischemic bowel disease
Conclusion
Accurate diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum requires a high index of clinical suspicion, particularly in children presenting with painless rectal bleeding. The Meckel scan remains the cornerstone of non-invasive diagnosis, especially in pediatric patients. While other imaging modalities and endoscopic techniques play a role in specific clinical scenarios, understanding the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic tool is essential for effective patient management. A multidisciplinary approach, involving pediatricians, surgeons, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians, is often optimal to ensure timely and accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of Meckel’s diverticulum.
Figure: Anatomical illustration of Meckel’s Diverticulum, highlighting its typical location in the ileum and connection to the omphalomesenteric duct remnant.
Figure: Radiographic image depicting a Meckel’s Diverticulum, often challenging to visualize with standard X-ray techniques, emphasizing the need for specialized scans for diagnosis.
Figure: Illustration of Meckel’s Diverticulum with its Supplying Artery, demonstrating the anomalous blood supply which can be targeted in angiographic diagnosis.
References
1.Sagar J, Kumar V, Shah DK. Meckel’s diverticulum: a systematic review. J R Soc Med. 2006 Oct;99(10):501-5. [PMC free article: PMC1592061] [PubMed: 17021300]
2.Park JJ, Wolff BG, Tollefson MK, Walsh EE, Larson DR. Meckel diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience with 1476 patients (1950-2002). Ann Surg. 2005 Mar;241(3):529-33. [PMC free article: PMC1356994] [PubMed: 15729078]
3.Hansen CC, Søreide K. Systematic review of epidemiology, presentation, and management of Meckel’s diverticulum in the 21st century. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e12154. [PMC free article: PMC6392637] [PubMed: 30170459]
4.Francis A, Kantarovich D, Khoshnam N, Alazraki AL, Patel B, Shehata BM. Pediatric Meckel’s Diverticulum: Report of 208 Cases and Review of the Literature. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2016;35(3):199-206. [PubMed: 27064958]
5.Yahchouchy EK, Marano AF, Etienne JC, Fingerhut AL. Meckel’s diverticulum. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 May;192(5):658-62. [PubMed: 11333103]
6.Uppal K, Tubbs RS, Matusz P, Shaffer K, Loukas M. Meckel’s diverticulum: a review. Clin Anat. 2011 May;24(4):416-22. [PubMed: 21322060]
7.St-Vil D, Brandt ML, Panic S, Bensoussan AL, Blanchard H. Meckel’s diverticulum in children: a 20-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 1991 Nov;26(11):1289-92. [PubMed: 1812259]
8.Evola G, Piazzese E, Bonanno S, Di Stefano C, Di Fede GF, Piazza L. Complicated Littre’s umbilical hernia with normal Meckel’s diverticulum: A case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Jul;84:106126. [PMC free article: PMC8250448] [PubMed: 34186459]
9.López-Lizárraga CR, Sánchez-Muñoz MP, Juárez-López GE, Pelayo-Orozco L, De la Cerda-Trujillo LF, Ploneda-Valencia CF. A rare case of a strangulated Littre’s hernia with Meckel’s diverticulum duplication. Case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;33:58-61. [PMC free article: PMC5338894] [PubMed: 28273609]
10.Horkoff MJ, Smyth NG, Hunter JM. A large incarcerated Meckel’s diverticulum in an inguinal hernia. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(12):899-901. [PMC free article: PMC4275813] [PubMed: 25460431]
11.Rattan KN, Singh J, Dalal P, Rattan A. Meckel’s diverticulum in children: Our 12-year experience. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2016 Oct-Dec;13(4):170-174. [PMC free article: PMC5154221] [PubMed: 28051045]
12.Kuru S, Kismet K. Meckel’s diverticulum: clinical features, diagnosis and management. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Nov;110(11):726-732. [PubMed: 30032625]
13.Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Harvin HJ, Francis IR. Imaging manifestations of Meckel’s diverticulum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jul;189(1):81-8. [PubMed: 17579156]
14.Routh WD, Lawdahl RB, Lund E, Garcia JH, Keller FS. Meckel’s diverticula: angiographic diagnosis in patients with non-acute hemorrhage and negative scintigraphy. Pediatr Radiol. 1990;20(3):152-6. [PubMed: 2352792]
15.Titley-Diaz WH, Aziz M. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jul 25, 2023. Meckel Scan. [PubMed: 32809335]
16.Kovacs M, Botstein J, Braverman S. Angiographic diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum in an adult patient with negative scintigraphy. J Radiol Case Rep. 2017 Mar;11(3):22-29. [PMC free article: PMC5441464] [PubMed: 28584569]
17.Lee JM, Jeen CD, Kim SH, Lee JS, Nam SJ, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B. Meckel’s diverticulum detected by computed tomographic enterography: report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;25(2):212-5. [PubMed: 25003685]
18.Ruscher KA, Fisher JN, Hughes CD, Neff S, Lerer TJ, Hight DW, Bourque MD, Campbell BT. National trends in the surgical management of Meckel’s diverticulum. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;46(5):893-6. [PubMed: 21616248]
19.Dumper J, Mackenzie S, Mitchell P, Sutherland F, Quan ML, Mew D. Complications of Meckel’s diverticula in adults. Can J Surg. 2006 Oct;49(5):353-7. [PMC free article: PMC3207587] [PubMed: 17152574]
