In the realm of mental health in the United States, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), serves as the authoritative guide for healthcare professionals. This manual is crucial for diagnosing various mental health conditions, and it has undergone several revisions to remain current with evolving understandings of mental health. Notably, a significant shift occurred between the DSM-IV and the DSM-5, marked by the removal of the multi-axial system, a framework that previously structured psychiatric diagnoses.
The DSM-IV, the fourth edition of this essential manual, employed a Medical Diagnosis Axis system. This system was composed of five distinct axes, each designed to capture a different facet of a patient’s condition. These axes aimed to provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of an individual’s mental health profile. Understanding the concept of the medical diagnosis axis within the DSM-IV is crucial for grasping the historical context of psychiatric diagnosis and the evolution of diagnostic approaches.
The DSM-IV’s multi-axial system was structured into these five categories, known as Axes:
- Axis I: Clinical Disorders This axis encompassed the primary mental health and substance use disorders that are typically considered episodic or fluctuating in nature.
- Axis II: Personality Disorders and Mental Retardation This axis was dedicated to enduring and pervasive conditions, including personality disorders and mental retardation (now termed Intellectual Development Disorder).
- Axis III: General Medical Conditions This axis recorded any physical health conditions that might be relevant to understanding or managing the patient’s mental health.
- Axis IV: Psychosocial and Environmental Problems This axis documented significant psychosocial and environmental stressors that could impact the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of mental disorders.
- Axis V: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) This axis provided a numerical scale to rate the individual’s overall level of psychological, social, and occupational functioning.
However, with the publication of the DSM-5, the APA moved away from this multi-axial system. The concept of the medical diagnosis axis, as defined by these five categories, was discontinued, signaling a significant change in how mental health professionals approach diagnosis and conceptualization of mental disorders.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/five-axes-of-the-dsm-iv-multi-axial-system-1067053_final-de64cd6b001f472f86ec6ed5b226ad3f.png)
Visual representation of the DSM-IV’s five axes, illustrating the multi-axial system used for medical diagnosis in psychiatry.
The Origins of the Multi-Axial System
The multi-axial system was introduced in the DSM-III, the third edition of the manual, marking a significant development in psychiatric diagnostics at that time. The intention behind implementing these axes was to create a structured method for clinicians to record supplementary diagnostic details beyond just the principal diagnosis. The medical diagnosis axis system was designed to provide a more holistic view of the patient.
For instance, consider a patient diagnosed with major depressive disorder, classified under Axis I. Using the multi-axial system, clinicians could also note on Axis IV if the patient was experiencing a lack of social support, or on Axis V if their overall functioning was severely impaired. This additional information, captured by the medical diagnosis axis framework, was intended to provide a richer clinical picture.
However, over time, the scientific justification for maintaining this categorical division of disorders came into question. By 2013, when the DSM-5 was released, the APA concluded that there was insufficient empirical evidence to support the separation of diagnoses into these distinct axes. Consequently, the multi-axial system, a defining feature of the DSM for several editions, was retired.
The Intended Purpose of the Multi-Axial System
The primary goal behind the implementation of the medical diagnosis axis system was to enhance the efficiency and comprehensiveness of patient diagnosis. By organizing diagnostic information across separate axes, it was believed that clinicians could systematically evaluate patients. This structured approach was meant to ensure that healthcare professionals considered various aspects of a patient’s condition, moving through each medical diagnosis axis to identify pertinent factors.
The system aimed to standardize the process of gathering and interpreting diagnostic data, ensuring that clinicians would methodically consider different dimensions of a patient’s mental health. It was envisioned as a way to promote a more thorough and organized approach to diagnosis.
Despite its initial intent, the multi-axial system was not without its critics. One major point of contention was the sometimes unclear distinction between Axis I and Axis II disorders. Furthermore, the separation between mental health disorders (Axis I & II) and general medical conditions (Axis III) was also seen as potentially artificial and confusing.
The DSM-5’s non-axial approach integrates the information previously categorized under Axes I, II, and III. Furthermore, it incorporates relevant details that would have been included in Axes IV and V as separate “V codes” or additional notations. This non-axial system has generally been favored by healthcare professionals who utilize the DSM, as it streamlines the diagnostic process while still allowing for the capture of important contextual information.
Axis I: Understanding Clinical Disorders
Axis I of the medical diagnosis axis system focused on what were termed “clinical disorders.” This category encompassed the majority of mental health conditions, excluding personality disorders and intellectual development disorders, which were classified separately. Disorders listed under Axis I were generally considered to be more acute or episodic and included a broad range of conditions such as:
- Disorders Typically Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescence: Conditions arising during developmental stages.
- Delirium, Dementia, and Amnestic and Other Cognitive Disorders: Disorders impacting cognitive functions.
- Mental Disorders Due to a General Medical Condition: Mental health issues directly caused by physical illnesses.
- Substance-Related Disorders: Problems related to the abuse of or dependence on substances.
- Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders: Conditions characterized by disturbances in thought and perception.
- Mood Disorders: Disorders primarily affecting mood regulation, such as depression and bipolar disorder.
- Anxiety Disorders: Conditions where anxiety is the predominant symptom.
- Somatoform Disorders: Conditions involving physical symptoms without a clear medical cause.
- Factitious Disorders: Conditions where individuals feign illness for psychological gain.
- Dissociative Disorders: Conditions involving disruptions in consciousness, memory, identity, or perception.
- Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders: Conditions related to sexual function, gender identity, and sexual preference.
- Eating Disorders: Conditions characterized by disturbed eating patterns and body image concerns.
- Sleep Disorders: Conditions affecting sleep patterns and quality.
- Impulse-Control Disorders Not Elsewhere Classified: Conditions involving difficulties controlling impulses or behaviors.
- Adjustment Disorders: Conditions arising in response to identifiable stressors.
- Other Conditions That May Be a Focus of Clinical Attention: A residual category for conditions not fitting neatly elsewhere.
DSM-5 Revisions to Axis I Categories
The DSM-5 brought about several changes to the classifications previously under Axis I. Notably, “Mental Disorders Due to a General Medical Condition,” “Factitious Disorders,” and “Adjustment Disorders” as distinct categories were removed. Conditions formerly classified under these categories were either reclassified or integrated into other existing categories within the DSM-5. “Eating Disorders” was broadened to “Feeding and Eating Disorders” to be more inclusive.
Furthermore, “Mood Disorders” was divided into two separate, more specific categories: “Bipolar and Related Disorders” and “Depressive Disorders,” reflecting a more refined understanding of these conditions. “Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders” was revised to encompass “Sexual Dysfunctions,” “Gender Dysphoria,” and “Paraphilic Disorders,” aiming for more precise terminology and classification.
Which Mental Health Conditions Were Axis I Disorders?
Axis II: Personality Disorders and Intellectual Development
Axis II of the medical diagnosis axis system was designated for personality disorders and mental retardation. These conditions were seen as more ingrained and enduring aspects of an individual’s functioning. The disorders classified under Axis II included:
- Paranoid Personality Disorder
- Schizoid Personality Disorder
- Schizotypal Personality Disorder
- Antisocial Personality Disorder
- Borderline Personality Disorder
- Histrionic Personality Disorder
- Narcissistic Personality Disorder
- Avoidant Personality Disorder
- Dependent Personality Disorder
- Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder
- Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
- Mental Retardation
DSM-5 Updates to Axis II Classifications
While the personality disorder categories remained largely unchanged in the DSM-5, the term “Mental Retardation” was updated to “Intellectual Disability” to align with evolving terminology and reduce stigma.
In the subsequent DSM-5-TR (text revision), “Intellectual Disability” was further refined to “Intellectual Development Disorder,” although “Intellectual disability” was retained in parentheses for continued reference, reflecting ongoing discussions and shifts in terminology within the field.
Axis III: General Medical Conditions in Diagnosis
Axis III of the medical diagnosis axis framework served to document any general medical conditions that were potentially relevant to the individual’s mental health. This axis recognized the important interplay between physical and mental health.
For example, a patient undergoing cancer treatment and experiencing chemotherapy might develop mental health issues such as anxiety or depression. In such cases, cancer, and its treatment, would be recorded on Axis III as a general medical condition significantly impacting mental health.
DSM-5 Approach to Axis III Information
In the DSM-5, the concept of Axis III as a separate category was removed. However, the importance of considering general medical conditions in mental health diagnosis was retained. Clinicians are now expected to document any relevant medical conditions alongside mental health diagnoses, ensuring that these factors are still considered as part of a comprehensive patient evaluation.
Axis IV: Psychosocial and Environmental Context
Axis IV of the medical diagnosis axis system was dedicated to outlining psychosocial and environmental problems that could be affecting the individual. This axis acknowledged that external factors play a significant role in mental health and well-being. Examples of issues that would have been documented on Axis IV include:
- Problems with primary support group (e.g., family issues, lack of social support)
- Problems related to the social environment (e.g., social isolation, discrimination)
- Educational problems (e.g., academic difficulties, illiteracy)
- Occupational problems (e.g., unemployment, job stress)
- Housing problems (e.g., homelessness, inadequate housing)
- Economic problems (e.g., poverty, financial strain)
- Problems with access to healthcare services (e.g., lack of insurance, transportation issues)
- Problems related to interaction with the legal system/crime (e.g., incarceration, legal disputes)
- Other psychosocial and environmental problems
DSM-5 Integration of Axis IV Information
Information that was previously captured on Axis IV is now integrated into the DSM-5 through the use of separate notations. Clinicians can add these notations to diagnoses as needed, allowing for the continued documentation of psychosocial and environmental factors influencing a patient’s condition, without the need for a separate axis.
Axis V: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)
Axis V of the medical diagnosis axis system utilized the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. This scale was a numerical rating from 0 to 100 designed to represent a clinician’s judgment of an individual’s overall level of functioning. The GAF score aimed to provide a single, summary measure of a person’s psychological, social, and occupational functioning. The scale was broadly defined as follows:
- 100-91: Superior functioning in a wide range of activities, no symptoms.
- 90-81: Absent or minimal symptoms, good functioning in all areas.
- 80-71: Transient and expectable reactions to psychosocial stressors.
- 70-61: Some mild symptoms OR some difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning.
- 60-51: Moderate symptoms OR moderate difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning.
- 50-41: Serious symptoms OR any serious impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning.
- 40-31: Some impairment in reality testing or communication OR major impairment in several areas.
- 30-21: Behavior considerably influenced by delusions or hallucinations OR serious impairment in communication or judgment.
- 20-11: Some danger of hurting self or others OR occasional failure to maintain minimal personal hygiene.
- 10-1: Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others OR persistent inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene OR serious suicidal act.
DSM-5 Handling of Axis V Information
Similar to Axis IV, the GAF from Axis V is no longer a component of the DSM-5’s diagnostic system. Instead, the DSM-5 incorporates the concept of assessing functional impairment as part of the diagnostic criteria for many disorders and through the use of optional severity and functional assessment measures. The emphasis remains on evaluating the impact of mental health conditions on an individual’s functioning, but without relying on the single numerical GAF score.
Limitations of the Multi-Axial System
Despite its intention to provide a comprehensive diagnostic framework, the multi-axial system faced several criticisms, leading to its eventual abandonment.
One significant concern was the perceived arbitrary distinction between Axis I and Axis II disorders. Clinicians often found it challenging to neatly categorize certain conditions, as some seemed to straddle the boundaries between these axes. There was a lack of clear empirical basis for this categorical separation. Furthermore, the GAF (Axis V) was criticized for not adequately capturing critical aspects such as suicide risk or the impact of disabilities on an individual’s overall functioning.
Ultimately, many healthcare professionals concluded that they could effectively diagnose patients and account for the complexities of each individual’s situation without the constraints of the multi-axial system. The DSM-5’s move to a non-axial system reflects a shift towards a more dimensional and integrated approach to diagnosis.
DSM-5-TR: Further Refinements
The most recent revision, the DSM-5-TR, has further refined diagnostic criteria for over 70 disorders and introduced new codes for documenting suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury. It also focused on updating language throughout the manual to reduce ambiguity and address potential racial and cultural biases, continuing the evolution of the DSM towards greater clarity and inclusivity.
Key Takeaways
The multi-axial system, with its medical diagnosis axis framework, was once a standard method for recording comprehensive diagnostic information for individuals with mental health conditions. However, due to limitations, lack of robust scientific support, and practical concerns, it was removed in the DSM-5. While no longer in use, understanding the medical diagnosis axis system provides valuable historical context for how mental health conditions were previously conceptualized and diagnosed. It also highlights the ongoing evolution of psychiatric diagnostics and the continuous effort to improve the accuracy, utility, and clinical relevance of diagnostic manuals like the DSM. The shift away from the medical diagnosis axis system in the DSM-5 represents a move towards a more streamlined and clinically relevant approach to understanding and diagnosing mental disorders.
List of Psychological Disorders
