Leveraging Subjective Data in Nurse Care Plans for Accurate Risk Diagnosis

The foundation of effective nursing care rests upon a systematic approach known as the nursing process. Since its inception in 1958 by Ida Jean Orlando, this process has been refined and remains crucial in guiding nurses to deliver patient-centered, goal-oriented care grounded in critical thinking and evidence-based practices. This framework emphasizes a holistic view of the patient, integrating both scientific knowledge and compassionate intuition to ensure quality care. The nursing process is structured into five sequential steps: assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation.

The Pivotal Role of Subjective Data in Nursing Assessment

Assessment, the initial step in the nursing process, is paramount. It involves the meticulous collection of both subjective and objective data, requiring robust critical thinking skills. Subjective data, often described as primary source information, encompasses verbal reports and perspectives directly from the patient or their caregivers. This can include descriptions of symptoms, feelings, values, perceptions of their health condition, and personal health history as narrated by the individual. Objective data, conversely, consists of measurable and observable facts such as vital signs, physical examination findings, laboratory results, and other quantifiable information.

Collecting subjective data effectively involves active listening and therapeutic communication techniques to build trust and encourage patients to share their experiences openly. Sources of subjective data extend beyond the patient themselves to include family members, close friends, and anyone involved in the patient’s care who can provide relevant insights. In today’s healthcare landscape, electronic health records (EHRs) also play a role by aggregating patient-reported outcomes and historical subjective notes, further enriching the assessment phase. The ability to discern meaningful patterns and potential risks from subjective accounts is a cornerstone of expert nursing practice, making critical thinking indispensable from the outset.

Utilizing Subjective Data for Risk Diagnosis

The nursing diagnosis phase is where clinical judgment synthesizes the collected data to identify actual or potential health problems. According to the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA), a nursing diagnosis is a “clinical judgment about individual, family or community responses to actual and potential health problems & life processes.” Subjective data is particularly vital in formulating risk diagnoses, which identify vulnerabilities and predict potential complications before they occur. By carefully analyzing patient-reported symptoms, lifestyle factors, emotional states, and perceived barriers to health, nurses can proactively identify risks. For example, a patient’s statement about feeling “increasingly anxious and overwhelmed” combined with subjective reports of poor sleep and appetite might indicate a risk for ineffective coping or anxiety.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs provides a valuable framework for prioritizing these diagnoses and subsequent care planning. This hierarchy, developed by Abraham Maslow in 1943, posits that basic physiological needs must be met before higher-level needs like safety, love, esteem, and self-actualization can be addressed. In nursing, this translates to prioritizing interventions that address immediate physiological and safety risks identified through both subjective and objective data. Subjective reports of pain, difficulty breathing, or food insecurity directly inform the assessment of physiological needs, while expressed fears or concerns about safety at home contribute to safety and security risk diagnoses.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs in Nursing

  • Physiological Needs: Addressing basic survival needs. Subjective data includes reports of hunger, thirst, pain, or difficulty breathing.
  • Safety and Security Needs: Ensuring physical and emotional safety. Subjective data includes expressions of fear, anxiety about falls, or concerns about home safety.
  • Love and Belonging Needs: Fostering social connection. Subjective data includes reports of loneliness, isolation, or lack of social support.
  • Self-Esteem Needs: Promoting confidence and independence. Subjective data includes expressions of low self-worth or feelings of helplessness.
  • Self-Actualization Needs: Encouraging personal growth and fulfillment. Subjective data includes aspirations and goals, and feelings of purpose.

Integrating Subjective Data into Nurse Care Plans

The planning phase of the nursing process leverages the insights gained from subjective data to formulate patient-centered goals and outcomes. Nursing care plans, informed by evidence-based practice guidelines, are crucial tools in this stage. They serve as roadmaps for individualized care, tailored to the patient’s unique needs and circumstances, many of which are revealed through subjective reports. Effective care plans not only address identified risks but also align with patient preferences and values, ensuring a collaborative approach to care. Subjective data helps to personalize goals, making them Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound (SMART). For instance, if a patient subjectively expresses a strong desire to regain independence at home, the care plan can incorporate goals focused on improving mobility and self-care skills, directly reflecting their personal aspirations.

Implementation and Evaluation: Responding to Subjective Experiences

Implementation involves putting the nursing care plan into action, carrying out specific nursing interventions. Even during this phase, subjective data remains relevant. Patient feedback on their comfort levels, perceived effectiveness of interventions, and any new symptoms they report are crucial for ongoing adjustments. For example, a patient’s subjective report of continued pain despite medication administration necessitates reassessment and potential modification of the pain management plan.

Evaluation, the final step, is intrinsically linked to subjective data. It involves assessing the extent to which planned outcomes have been achieved and relies heavily on patient feedback. Subjective reports of improved well-being, reduced anxiety, or increased satisfaction with care are key indicators of success. If subjective data reveals that the patient’s experience is not aligning with expected outcomes, the care plan must be revised, and the nursing process cycles back to assessment to gather further information and refine the approach.


Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs for Nursing. Understanding these needs helps prioritize care and interpret subjective data related to patient well-being and risk.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite its critical importance, effectively utilizing subjective data in nursing practice faces challenges. Time constraints, high nurse-to-patient ratios, and the complexity of interpreting nuanced patient narratives can hinder thorough subjective data collection and analysis. Furthermore, nurses require ongoing education and training to enhance their skills in therapeutic communication, active listening, and critical thinking to extract meaningful insights from subjective patient reports.

Looking ahead, the increasing integration of technology in healthcare, such as advanced EHR systems and patient portals, offers opportunities to streamline the collection and analysis of subjective data. Standardized tools for capturing patient-reported outcomes and incorporating natural language processing to analyze subjective notes can further enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of using subjective data for risk diagnosis and personalized care planning. Embracing these advancements while emphasizing the fundamental importance of human connection and skillful communication will be crucial in maximizing the value of subjective data in nursing practice and ensuring patient-centered, safe, and effective care.

References

  1. Karttunen M, Sneck S, Jokelainen J, Elo S. Nurses’ self-assessments of adherence to guidelines on safe medication preparation and administration in long-term elderly care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Mar;34(1):108-117. [PubMed: 31058362]
  2. Younan L, Clinton M, Fares S, Samaha H. The translation and cultural adaptation validity of the Actual Scope of Practice Questionnaire. East Mediterr Health J. 2019 Apr 25;25(3):181-188. [PubMed: 31054228]
  3. Epstein AS, Desai AV, Bernal C, Romano D, Wan PJ, Okpako M, Anderson K, Chow K, Kramer D, Calderon C, Klimek VV, Rawlins-Duell R, Reidy DL, Goldberg JI, Cruz E, Nelson JE. Giving Voice to Patient Values Throughout Cancer: A Novel Nurse-Led Intervention. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jul;58(1):72-79.e2. [PMC free article: PMC6849206] [PubMed: 31034869]
  4. Shih CY, Huang CY, Huang ML, Chen CM, Lin CC, Tang FI. The association of sociodemographic factors and needs of haemodialysis patients according to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jan;28(1-2):270-278. [PubMed: 29777561]
  5. Maslow K, Mezey M. Recognition of dementia in hospitalized older adults. Am J Nurs. 2008 Jan;108(1):40-9; quiz, 50. [PubMed: 18156858]
  6. Raso A, Ligozzi L, Garrino L, Dimonte V. Nursing profession and nurses’ contribution to nursing education as seen through students’ eyes: A qualitative study. Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):414-424. [PubMed: 31056754]
  7. Hu J, Yang Y, Fallacaro MD, Wands B, Wright S, Zhou Y, Ruan H. Building an International Partnership to Develop Advanced Practice Nurses in Anesthesia Settings: Using a Theory-Driven Approach. J Transcult Nurs. 2019 Sep;30(5):521-529. [PubMed: 31060444]
  8. Bird M, Tolan J, Carter N. Baccalaureate Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Learning in Mentored and Simulated Research Practica. J Nurs Educ. 2019 May 01;58(5):290-293. [PubMed: 31039263]
  9. Salmond SW, Echevarria M, Allread V. Care Bundles: Increasing Consistency of Care. Orthop Nurs. 2017 Jan/Feb;36(1):45-48. [PubMed: 28107300]
  10. Rigolosi R, Salmond S. The journey to independent nurse practitioner practice. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2014 Dec;26(12):649-57. [PubMed: 24824941]

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *