The Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) system represents a significant advancement in standardized nursing language, offering a comprehensive, research-backed framework for nursing practice. Now in its 8th edition, NIC provides a structured vocabulary of nursing interventions applicable across all healthcare settings and specialties. For nurses focused on delivering optimal nursing care plans, understanding nursing diagnosis and intervention is paramount, and NIC 8th Edition is an essential resource in this domain.
At its core, NIC defines a nursing intervention as “any treatment, based upon clinical judgment and knowledge, that a nurse performs to enhance patient/client outcomes” (Wagner et al, 2024, p. xix). This encompasses both independent and collaborative actions, direct and indirect care, reflecting the full spectrum of nursing expertise. While individual nurses specialize in particular areas, the NIC classification as a whole captures the collective knowledge and skills of the entire nursing profession. From intensive care units to home healthcare and primary care settings, NIC serves as a universal language for documenting and communicating nursing care.
NIC interventions are remarkably diverse, spanning both physiological needs, such as Acid-Base Management, and psychosocial aspects, like Anxiety Reduction. The classification includes interventions for treating illnesses (e.g., Hyperglycemia Management), preventing health issues (e.g., Fall Prevention), and promoting wellness (e.g., Exercise Promotion). Although many interventions target individual patients, NIC also addresses family-centered care (e.g., Family Integrity Promotion) and community health initiatives (e.g., Environmental Management: Community). Even indirect care activities critical to healthcare delivery, such as Supply Chain Management and Research Protocol Management, are included within the NIC framework. Each intervention in the classification is detailed with a standardized label name, a clear definition, a list of specific activities to guide implementation, and references to evidence-based literature.
Navigating the NIC 8th Edition: Structure and Domains
The NIC 8th edition features 614 distinct interventions, organized into a user-friendly structure of thirty classes and seven domains. These domains provide a broad categorization, encompassing:
- Physiological: Basic: Interventions addressing fundamental physical needs.
- Physiological: Complex: Interventions for managing intricate physiological conditions.
- Behavioral: Interventions focused on mental and emotional health and behavior modification.
- Safety: Interventions aimed at preventing harm and ensuring a secure environment.
- Family: Interventions that support family well-being and dynamics.
- Health System: Interventions related to healthcare organization and delivery.
- Community: Interventions targeting population health and community wellness.
Each intervention is assigned a unique numerical code for easy identification and integration into electronic health records and databases. The NIC system is designed to be dynamic, with a continuous feedback and review process to ensure its ongoing relevance and accuracy. Nurses and other healthcare professionals are encouraged to submit suggestions for revisions or new interventions, contributing to the evolution of the classification. New editions, reflecting these updates, are published every 4 to 6 years, with the 8th edition released in 2024, following a history of publications dating back to 1992.
NIC and Clinical Reasoning: Enhancing Nursing Decision-Making in Care Plans
The NIC framework significantly enhances nursing care plans by providing a standardized language that supports robust clinical reasoning. Models like the Outcome Present State Test (OPT), initially developed by Pesut and Herman (1999) and later updated by Kuiper et al (2017) to incorporate NIC, demonstrate how this classification system can be integrated into clinical decision-making processes. The OPT model, enhanced with NIC, has been successfully applied across various patient populations, including neonatal, adolescent, adult, women’s and men’s health, older adults, and those in hospice and palliative care. By providing a structured approach and standardized terminology, NIC facilitates improved teaching and practice of clinical decision-making, which is crucial for developing effective nursing diagnosis and intervention strategies. Research confirms that using such models positively impacts the clinical reasoning skills of nursing students (Griggs et al., 2019).
NIC’s Recognition and Integration within Healthcare Systems
NIC holds a prominent position as one of the standardized languages recognized by the American Nurses’ Association (ANA). Its inclusion in major healthcare informatics resources like the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) at the National Library of Medicine (NLM) and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) underscores its importance and accessibility for researchers and practitioners. Furthermore, The Joint Commission recognizes NIC as a valuable nursing classification system for meeting uniform data standards. NIC’s relevance extends to public health initiatives, as it has been linked to the Healthy People 2030 Social Determinants of Health, highlighting its role in addressing broader health equity issues (Wagner et al, 2023).
Hundreds of healthcare organizations have adopted NIC to standardize care plans, competency evaluations, and nursing information systems. Nursing education programs utilize NIC to shape curricula and define graduate competencies. Leading nursing textbooks incorporate NIC to discuss nursing treatments, and researchers employ NIC to evaluate the effectiveness of nursing interventions. The standardized documentation provided by NIC facilitates meaningful data collection and analysis, enabling healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement and demonstrate the impact of nursing care plans on patient outcomes. Studies conducted in NIC-using organizations have shown the system’s ability to reveal relationships between care plan components and patient outcomes, aiding in targeted care delivery and addressing critical needs like social determinants of health (Wagner et al, 2023, p. 1870).
The NNN Linkage: NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC for Comprehensive Care Planning
NIC is frequently used in conjunction with nursing diagnoses from NANDA-I (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International) and nursing outcomes from NOC (Nursing Outcomes Classification). This triad, known as NNN, forms a powerful framework for developing comprehensive nursing care plans. The NNN linkage is widely used in research and secondary data analysis globally (Tastan et al., 2014; Fennelly et al., 2021; Macieira et al., 2019), proving valuable for secondary analysis of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data (Macieira et al., 2019). The robust taxonomic structure of NNN, including clear definitions at all classification levels (Müller Staub et al., 2017), and their observable and measurable nature (Herdman, et al., 2021; Moorhead et al., 2024; Wagner et al., 2024), make them highly suitable for mapping and analysis.
Global Interest and Accessibility of NIC
The NIC system has garnered significant international interest and adoption in numerous countries, including Brazil, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Spain, Switzerland, and The Netherlands. To enhance its global accessibility, NIC has been translated into multiple languages, including Simplified and Traditional Chinese, Dutch, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Portuguese, Spanish, and Turkish, with ongoing translation efforts to reach even wider audiences.
Sources:
Fennelly, O., Grogan, L., Reed, A., & Hardiker, N. R. (2021). Use of standardized terminologies in clinical practice: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 149, 104431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104431
Griggs, K., Arms, T., & Turrise, S. (2019). Outcomes Present State Test Model for expanding students’ clinical reasoning. Nurse Educator, 44(3), 174. https://doi.org/%2010.1097/NNE.0000000000000578
Herdnman, T. H., Kamitsuru, S., & Takáo Lopez, C. (2021). Nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification 2021–2023 (12th ed.). Thieme.
Kuiper, R., Donnell, S., Pesut, D., & Turrise, S. (2017). The essentials of clinical reasoning for nurses: Using the Outcome Present State Test model for reflective practice, Sigma Theta Tau International.
Macieira, T. G. R., Chianca, T. C. M., Smith, M. B., Yao, Y., Bian, J., Wilkie, D. J., Dunn Lopez, K., & Keenan, G. M. (2019). Secondary use of standardized nursing care data for advancing nursing science and practice: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 26(11), 1401–1411. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz086
Moorhead, S., Swanson, E., & Johnson, M. (Eds.). (2024). Nurisng outcomes classification (NOC): Measurement of health outcomes (7th ed.). Elsevier.
Müller-Staub, M., Rappold, E. (2017). Klassifikationen/Systeme –Beurteilung anhand von Studien. In M. Müller-Staub, K. Schalek, & P. König (Eds.), Pflegeklassifikationen: Anwendung in Praxis, Bildungund elektronischer Pflegedokumentation (pp. 261–305). Hogrefe.
Müller-Staub, M., Lavin, M. A., Needham, I., & van Achterberg, T. (2007). Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evaluation of ICNP, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.001
Pesut, D., & Herman, J. (1999). Clinical reasoning: The art and science of critical and creative thinking. Delmar.
Tastan, S., Linch, G. C., Keenan, G. M., Stifter, J., McKinney, D., Fahey, L., Lopez, K. D., Yao, Y., & Wilkie, D. J. (2014). Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: a systematic review. International journal of nursing studies, 51(8), 1160–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.004
Wagner, C. M., Butcher, H. K., Bulechek, G. M., Dochterman, J. M., & Wagner, Clarke, M. F. C. M. (Eds.). (2024). Nursing interventions classification (NIC) (8th ed.). Elsevier.
Wagner, C. M., Lopes, C.T., Jensen, G. A., Moreno, E. A. M., DeBoer, E., & Dunn Lopez, K. (2023). Removing the roadblocks to promoting health equity: Finding the social determinants of health addressed in nursing standardized classifications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 30(11), 1868–1877. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad098
For further information contact:
Center for Nursing Classification & Clinical Effectiveness
The University of Iowa, College of Nursing, 407 CNB
Iowa City IA 52242-1121
319-335-7051
email: [email protected]
